Shell Pakistan says to pay fine for Bahawalpur tanker fire that killed 217

OGRA had held the company responsible for one of the worst accidents in the country's history


Reuters July 11, 2017
OGRA had held Shell Pakistan responsible for the worst accidents in the country's history. PHOTO: EXPRESS

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell on Tuesday agreed to pay a fine of about 257 million rupees ($2.4 million) in compensation for the tanker explosion on the outskirts of Bahawalpur that killed more than 200 people last month.

The fiery blast on June 25 was one of the worst accidents in the country's history. A tanker carrying fuel rolled over in Punjab and villagers rushed to collect leaking fuel.

Something then set off a fireball.

The regulator, the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA), held Shell Pakistan responsible for the accident in which 217 people died and 61 were injured.

The company said the tanker was owned by a contractor it hired to transport its fuel.

Vehari police book four for stealing fuel as another oil tanker flips over

Shell Pakistan Ltd (SPL) said it would pay the fine to "comply with the regulator’s directive".

In a statement, Shell Pakistan added: "However, we do so while reserving the right to contest the fine."

The energy regulator ordered Shell Pakistan to pay a fine of 10 million rupees ($95,000).

In addition, it ordered the company to pay one million rupees ($9,400) in compensation to the families of each of those killed and half a million ($4,700) for each person injured.

Shell Pakistan said it did not accept liability but it did "clearly recognise that this was a tragedy that has deeply affected the community" as the holy month of Ramazan ended.

COMMENTS (8)

Irfan | 6 years ago | Reply We are the worst opportunists in the history of mankind.
Electric | 6 years ago | Reply The amount is like a peanut for Shell Pakistan.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ