The writer is the editor and translator of Why I write: Essays by Saadat Hasan Manto, published by Westland in 2014. He is Executive Director of Amnesty International India. The views expressed here are his own.
aakar.patel@tribune.com.pk
Now we are being told that Kanhaiya’s voice cannot be heard in the tapes. He should not have been accused of sedition for this reason, should not have been arrested and jailed, and it was a criminal offense for lawyers to have attacked him in court. He is owed an apology by the PM and Smriti Irani who tweeted and made strong statements on the JNU matter.
When he was released, Kanhaiya made a speech which many thought was brilliant. I was one of them and I wrote that the BJP should not finger him further because he was dangerous for them. He has a silver tongue and can effectively counter the pompous bombast of the PM in a way leaders like Rahul Gandhi are unable to. After he was out of jail I visited Kanhaiya and the meeting validated what was obvious in his speech. Since his release, the BJP’s students wing has ignored him and the party also has stayed away from engaging him, wisely denying him media attention. The leaking of the news that there is no evidence against him is probably to seal this and move on.
The question is: why are students so willing to get into trouble when it is clear that their actions are detested by media and the general population and they face violence? The reason is that there is no other forum today in India for resistance to an essentially majoritarian and thuggish ideology. The BJP and its Hindutva groups are pushing the hard nationalism agenda. They do not tolerate an opinion on anthem, flag, Kashmir, Maoism or minority rights that is at variance with their own. The Congress believes that there is not much electoral benefit in standing for individual rights, free speech and civil liberties. The courts have also decided that the mood is in favour of greater nationalism and recent judgments, such as the one forcing all Indians to listen to and stand for the national anthem before a movie, indicate this. The media of course is a business and must bow to popular opinion. To some extent newspapers can allow dissenting opinions on their edit and op-ed pages but for television this is not really possible. The news channels have to stand with the majority if they want to keep their ratings high. The only forum for resistance and dissent has become the university. And this is where brave young women and men like Kanhaiya, Umar Khalid, Gurmeher and Shehla Rashid are standing up against Hindutva. They are saying nothing wrong. What is wrong in opening a dialogue with Kashmiris and what is wrong in accepting that we are mistreating our adivasis and dalits? It is the truth.
I was speaking to the former chief election commissioner MS Gill (who brought in the electronic voting machine, making India’s electoral process one of the world’s best) about this issue and I asked him what makes a great university. He has been to Cambridge and he said that it was allowing free thinking. This is the right that our brave students have been demanding. They demanded this last year, and were abused and thrashed at the time, though now the Modi government’s police force quietly leaks the news that the man they demonised most did nothing illegal.
As another round of violence and hatred against ‘anti-nationals’ begins, all of us, whether or not we agree with their views, should support and defend them.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 6th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ