Women’s Tennis Association: Simon says it’s time for change

Chief executive considers introducing super tie-breakers, no-ad scoring in singles matches


Afp October 02, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

WUHAN: Women’s tennis boss Steve Simon said he’s considering introducing super tie-breakers and no-ad scoring for singles matches in a radical move to shorten them and make them more TV-friendly.

The much-criticised season schedule is also in the crosshairs with plans to split the calendar into “premium” events and “pathway” tournaments and reduce the load on players, Simon told AFP.

“To think that we don’t need to adjust our format so we can play matches that are 60 to 90 minutes in length as opposed to three hours, I think is very short-sighted,” he said.

Halep knocked dizzy at Wuhan Open

The WTA chief executive said he was mulling replacing third sets with super tie-breakers, already used in non-grand slam doubles, when matches are locked at one set each.

Doubles matches on the WTA and the men’s ATP circuit also use no-ad scoring, which means when a game is at 40-40 it is decided by the next point rather than playing ‘deuce’ and ‘advantage’.

Simon acknowledged that a shake-up in the scoring system is likely to ruffle feathers in a sport where traditions and origins are often held dear.

Konta inches closer to world’s top ten

The scoring changes took a long time to be accepted in doubles and still remain unpopular amongst some players who have to switch to the old format at Grand Slams.

But the new rules also create shorter matches that are more predictable in length, making them easier for broadcasters and TV audiences.

“Our future audience, they’re not looking to watch three hours of anything,” said Simon, adding that he was committed to “fundamental change”.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2016.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ