Indian, Pakistani troops trade fire across LoC

The two nuclear-armed rivals declared a ceasefire in 2003, to maintain peace and tranquility along the LoC


News Desk October 01, 2016
File photo of Indian army on LoC.

Pakistani and Indian troops traded fire across the Line of Control (LoC) in the Bhimber sector early Saturday, an Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) statement said.

Pakistan Army rubbishes India's claim of 'surgical strikes' along LoC

"Pakistani troops befittingly responded to Indian unprovoked firing which started at 0400 and continued till 0800 at LoC in Bhimber sector today," reads the statement.

Earlier, two Pakistan Army soldiers were killed on Thursday as Indian forces resorted to unprovoked firing along the Line of Control (LoC) in Bhimber, Kel and Lipa sectors.

According to the ISPR, exchange of fire took place in the Bhimber, Hot Spring, Kel and Lipa sectors, and lasted about six hours early on Thursday, the Pakistani military’s press wing said in a statement, adding Pakistani troops mounted a fitting response to unprovoked Indian firing.

Two Pakistani soldiers killed as India violates ceasefire along LoC

India claimed to have conducted surgical strikes along the LoC. “India’s claims of surgical strikes are baseless,” DG ISPR Asim Bajwa said in a statement. “There has been no surgical strike by India, instead there had been cross border fire initiated and conducted by India.”

The military’s media wing added, “As per rules of engagement same was strongly and befittingly responded by Pakistani troops”.

The two nuclear-armed rivals declared a ceasefire in 2003, to maintain peace and tranquility along the LoC and Working Boundary.

COMMENTS (2)

Shabbir hassan | 8 years ago | Reply We are ready to fight against terorrist agency's of indian RAW AND INDIAN ARMY. We want final war against India. To save world peace and specialy south Asia......
muhammad Husnain | 8 years ago | Reply Pakistan Zindabad:-):-)
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ