Karachi park encroachments to be removed in 30 days: CDGK

City government assures Supreme Court of operations against illegal encroachment in the city's public parks.


Express February 02, 2011

ISLAMABAD: The Karachi city district government assured the Supreme Court on Wednesday that all illegal encroachments in the city’s public parks would be removed within a month.

This was stated by the City and District Government Karachi’s (CDGK) lawyer to the court, which had ordered the city government to start an operation against illegal occupation of parks.

The lawyer told the three-member bench of the court hearing the case that the encroachments would be removed within 30 days.

In today’s hearing, Justice Khalilur Rahman Ramday said that illegally built mosques and imambargahs coud not be considered legitimate construction.

Former Karachi Nazim Niamatullah Khan was also directed by the court to cooperate with the city government in helping to remove the illegal buildings.

In the last hearing, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry had asked the city government to start the operation.

An operation against encroachers had to be called off last week after bulldozers and equipment to remove encroachments were blocked by encroachers with trucks loaded with sand and gravel by the residents of Gharibabad.

The residents and shop owners refused to budge until alternate places were allotted to them.

COMMENTS (2)

Syed | 13 years ago | Reply Subhan Allah Qadri Sahab ! I really hope your above post was sarcastic ! instead of serious one ! Its haram to pray in an illegal place!!1
Mullah Zaeef Qadri | 13 years ago | Reply Mosques built over illegal land are legal. We built a mosque called "Medina Masjid" beside Dolmen Center in Tariq Road Karachi after taking over a children's park there. Now its a big mosque. If ottomans can convert Byzantine's church into a mosque, we can build mosques on grabbed children's parks.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ