Editorial

BJP promises

In its annual report, Amnesty International has pointed out Indian government’s failure to uphold personal freedoms

Editorial February 26, 2016

Indian PM, Narendra Modi. PHOTO: AFP

When the BJP government in India swept into power in 2014, it made a lot of big promises. Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed huge popularity thanks in part to his savvy use of social media. He seemed exactly like the kind of prime minister a modern and vibrant India needed. Charismatic enough to be liked by the public, having enough political acumen to hold his own against top international leaders and with enough power to usher in fast-paced economic growth in his country. Cut to two years later and the good days Mr Modi promised have failed to materialise; at least as far as civil liberties are concerned. In its annual report released on February 24, Amnesty International has pointed out the Indian government’s failure to uphold personal freedoms. It has spoken critically of the government’s support for intolerance through both speech and action. NGOs critical of the Indian government have seen restrictions imposed on their funding, individuals have been kept in prison without any charges or trial and there is growing minorities- and caste-based discrimination.

Meanwhile, the Indian government terms criticism of its actions attempts to take attention away from its cornerstone policy of rapid economic growth. Mr Modi has said that he is the prime minister for the whole of India, not just of people belonging to a particular religion or caste. However, as protesters marched through Delhi, decrying the government’s decision to arrest a student leader on sedition charges, his assertion did not seem to hold true. The sedition charges are viewed as yet another attempt to censor free speech and curb the right of individuals to question government policies and actions. Amnesty International has noted in its report that while the Indian government does not appear willing to take measures to uphold civil liberties, the people of India have different ideas. There is widespread criticism from various segments of society against intolerance. If India is to become the pluralistic society it wishes to be, its government needs to pay attention to the voice of the people for whom the good days still seem a distant dream.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 27^th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (5)

Secular Hindu | 8 years ago | Reply BJP in run up to Lok Sabha eelctions had raised pitch on tall promises and inadequacies of earlier government. expectations were raised to sky by making assurances like return of black money, increase in GDp growth, higher investments, better governance , opening of various sectors etc. Infact on the most of these fronts track record of state BJP governments was questionable like BJP blindly opposed reforms like GST, Insurance , Land acquisition etc. when in Opposition. Also on Nuclear deal with USA BJP was main architect of Opposition initiating no-confidence motion against Congress government.Even on economic development front, so-called Gujarat model which was boasted about by BJP and Modi, is now found to be faulty and full of holes in actual data.Modi now appears to have become victim of right wing cultural ideology of sangh parivar, rather than implementing pro-development promises made during elections.GDP , Exports, Indian currency appears to be faltering. price is under control more becoz of able RBI governor and low crude prices, rather than any well designed Fiscal policies of Modi government.Modi government appears to be talent deficit in Ministry and also outside advisors like sangh parivar.let us hope Modi is able to shed the miller stone in the form of sangh parivar and concentrate on making promises come true.

Shabbir Ahmed | 8 years ago | Reply Does Amnesty International carries out any research of it's own or just picks news from some biased news paper. This report can't be any farther from the truth. In India there seems to be excess freedom, people are not even scared to carry out anti national protests in the heart of capital of India. The government is handling the situation very delicately to say the least. National security can not be compromised and citizens can't be put to risk. In US there is Patriot Act, which enables security agencies to put any citizen in prison for years just on the basis of suspicion and without any concrete evidence. Notwithstanding this law being little harsh, countries like US and India which are facing evil of terrorism, need these laws.