SBP-IBA survey: Economic pessimism creeps back in

Consumers’ perceptions over current, expected conditions record single largest drop since January 2012


Kazim Alam September 29, 2014

KARACHI:


Loud pronouncements against the government from opposition leaders encamped outside parliament for a month seem to have finally induced some economic pessimism in Pakistan.


Consumers’ perceptions about current and expected economic conditions have recorded the single largest drop since January 2012, according to the Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) released on Monday. It is jointly conducted by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the Institute of Business Administration (IBA) after every two months.



The consumer confidence survey revealed CCI decreased to 133.81 points in September from 142.26 in July. The decline of 8.45 points is the single largest drop that CCI has recorded over any two consecutive editions of the survey since its inception in January 2012.

CCI is made up of expected economic conditions (EEC) index – which measures households’ expectations of economic conditions in the next six months – and the current economic conditions (CEC) index that captures households’ current economic conditions relative to the last six months.

It should be noted that the central bank’s latest monetary policy statement released on September 20 mentioned the ‘deterioration’ in the SBP-IBA consumer confidence survey as one of the reasons for keeping the policy rate flat at 10%.

Both sub-indices of CCI registered a substantial decline in September. The CEC and EEC shed 10.37 and 6.76 points, respectively, between July and September, the survey shows.

However, it revealed that relative to the preceding edition, households are now expecting a slight decrease in inflationary pressures over the next six months.

The average Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation in 2013-14 remained 8.6%. The average CPI inflation during July and August was recorded at 7.4%. According to the SBP, the current outlook of around 8% average CPI inflation for 2014-15 may change adversely if electricity subsidies are cut and the Gas Infrastructure Development Cess is levied.

The survey also revealed that 21.27% of more than 1,800 surveyed households were ‘positive’ about their ‘income a year later’ as opposed to 18.58% in July. The response of 33.74% households was negative when asked about buying durable items in the next six months compared to 30.04% in July.

The percentage of households expressing interest in buying a car in the next six months has also decreased notably in September over July.



About 5.2% households surveyed in September were ‘positive’ on the question of unemployment as opposed to 5.86% in July, meaning they expected the level of joblessness in the country over the next six months would slightly increase.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 30th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (3)

Bablu | 9 years ago | Reply

Who is responsible for this? The answer is not difficult

ishrat salim | 9 years ago | Reply

@ET Reader:

Sadly, do not agree...this dharna has been peaceful till today. The containers placed by force ( although SC has ordered to remove it ), belongs to business community for export & import & many of them had been filled with orders. These were forcefully taken away by the LEAs & placed as obstacles. This is no ordinary loss in terms of business, economy & future orders, which our govt does not realize. One is appalled by the attitude of the businessmen whose containers are taken away by LEAs & yet they do not approach the court...hence, IK / TuQ are not responsible for the loss, but we all are collectively responsible. Had model town incident not taken place & IK demand to open only 4 constituencies for vote verification was accepted in the beginning by the NS govt, these 2 dharnas was avoidable. So, who is responsible ?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ