Reconstruction for economic democracy — I

This part of the article indicates some of the immediate policy initiatives required after the floods.


Dr Akmal Hussain October 05, 2010

Consider the scale of the destruction resulting from the great flood: over 20 million people affected, homes destroyed, livelihoods lost, canals, barrages, water courses, tube wells and electricity stations damaged, roads and bridges wiped out. My own rough estimate of the reconstruction cost is about $18 billion.

The scale of the required reconstruction effort, while it presents a formidable challenge, also provides a great opportunity. The opportunity is to undertake the structural reforms necessary to place Pakistan’s economy on a new path of sustained and equitable growth. Such a growth process, if achieved, could give a stake in the economy to all of the people rather than a small elite and thereby lay the basis of what in my recent work I have called economic democracy. In this part of the article, I will indicate some of the immediate policy initiatives required, and in the second part, an outline of strategy to achieve economic democracy will be articulated.

For short-term policy imperatives, four immediate economic policy measures may be considered in the context of the reconstruction effort:

1. If the winter (rabi) crop is to be planted and a serious food deficit next summer is averted, immediate measures must be undertaken to provide farmers in the flood affected areas, good quality seed, fertiliser and pesticides together with timely provision of tube well water to enable the planting of wheat in the month ahead.

2. It is time now to consider shifting away from the IMF approach of economic contraction to a new policy of economic stimulation that aims to revive economic growth. Pakistan’s GDP growth has declined sharply to two per cent this year and the per capita income growth has become negative. Not only has this sharply increased poverty and unemployment, it will also result in a slowdown in the growth of government revenues. The former will place further stresses on the fragile democratic structure and the latter will increase the budget deficit. The earlier attempts to cut down the budget deficit (6.3 per cent of GDP this year) through expenditure reduction have failed, and in the years ahead the only viable policy of controlling the budget deficit is by increasing revenues through accelerated GDP growth. Infrastructure projects in the flood affected areas provide an opportunity of doing so.

3. Just before the flood, the food insecure population had been estimated at about 77 per cent, it may now have reached over 85 per cent. There is clearly an urgent need to provide food security to the people of Pakistan in general and in the flood-affected areas of the country in particular, where food insecurity is most intense. In this context the coverage of the social protection measures needs to be enlarged, and the identity and locations of the flood-affected population quickly established so that ATM cards under the Benazir Income Support Programme can be issued as soon as possible.

4. At the same time an employment guarantee scheme in the form of a cash for work programme ought to be launched in the flood-affected areas in the first instance, followed by the rest of the country.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 6th, 2010.

COMMENTS (2)

Meekal Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply Akmal, Great to read you here. I like your employment guarantee scheme. When I said reconstruction offers an 'opportunity' many commented here that I was a dreamer. I am not aware of any spending reduction efforts by the government that have 'failed' unless you mean cutting development spending. That is the wrong thing to do. I have said before, development spending should not be the slack variable in the system because you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Cut current spending and bring defense spending under some semblance of control. A 75% salary increase and an additional Rs 100 billion on top of their earlier allocation suggests to me that they are on the way to sinking the entire economy. If you must cut, then do it selectively and not across-the-board. Keep on-going projects especially in high-priority sectors and those that are externally financed and bring them swiftly to completion. The Planning Commission knows how to do this. We all want a resumption of growth and if we do it right I foresee the potential of a V-shaped recovery in GDP growth accompanied by declining inflation in the period ahead. But this will only happen if the macroeconomic picture is kept credibly tight, IMF or no IMF. Macroeconomic stability is pro-growth and pro-poor. Any 'stimulus' unless well calibrated and fully-financed will only lead to a renewed burst of inflation. That would be catastrophic. As you well know Pakistan has never experienced sustained double-digit inflation and we have no social protection for the poor. I don't know how well the Benazir sceme is working. You will. To me its too politically-tainted even if the idea is good. The provinces, flush with funds they don't know what to do with, need to drasticaly pare back their current as well as development expenditures because their development programs far exceed their administrative and technical capacity to spend. This is no time to throw money at grandiose, half-baked badly-prepared schemes. While they are at it, they need to raise revenue and stop relying on hand-outs, cash development loans and over-drafts at the central bank. I don't share your optimism on the tax revenue side. Whether the economy is growing by 2% or 8%, we can't seem to break out of the 10% tax-to-GDP rut. There is no cyclicality in tax revenues. This means the problem is structural and we all know that. May be the RGST will turn out to be the magic bullet. I don't know. I could go on but enough said.
Syed Nadir El-Edroos | 13 years ago | Reply The ideas you and others have presented all offer some direction to our masters. However, when economic pragmatism, politics and the need for our nations elite to maintain their position vis a vis power dynamics suggests that any policy that is adopted will do little to bring about grassroot level change. Sad but true.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ