Apologise, PM tells NATO

PM Gilani says govt will go beyond “diplomatic condemnation” and use “other options” if cross-border strikes continue.


Zia Khan October 02, 2010

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani on Friday demanded an apology from the Nato forces stationed in Afghanistan for repeated violations of Pakistan’s airspace by their helicopters and said that his government will go beyond “diplomatic condemnation” and use “other options” if cross-border strikes continued.

“If Pakistan’s integrity is attacked again, there are other ways and options…and we will consider them,” Gilani told lawmakers in the National Assembly on Friday. However, he did not say what other “non-diplomatic options” could be.

Meanwhile, the authorities stopped trucks carrying fuel and military hardware for Nato troops in Afghanistan for a second consecutive day on Thursday.

Nato helicopter gunships on Thursday violated Pakistan’s airspace and targeted a security checkpoint in the Kurram tribal region, killing three paramilitary Frontier Corps soldiers. It was the fourth cross-border air strike by Nato forces in as many days.

Gilani sought either an explanation or compensation from Nato for the pre-dawn attack in Kurram Agency. “We have cooperation in the war on terror…it doesn’t mean we have sold out our sovereignty and integrity,” the premier added.

“When we (Pakistan and Nato) have intelligence cooperation, they  (international forces) must share with us any information and we, our forces, will take the action. They should not carry out attacks themselves,” Gilani said, repeating his government’s stated position on the issue.

The prime minister was responding to a point of order by an opposition lawmaker who advised the government not to compromise on such things. “How long we will continue to tolerate such things…Just ask them (Americans), enough is enough,” Lt-Gen (Retd) Abdul Qadir Baloch of the PML-N said.

Nab ordinance

Earlier Premier Gilani told the lower house of parliament that he was not aware of any ordinance President Asif Zardari had issued secretly to transfer the powers of the chief of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to the law minister.

Gilani, however, appeared to be “uneasy” when a lawmaker raised the issue during the brief proceedings for the day.

He told the house that the government has sought more time from the Supreme Court for the appointment of a new NAB chairman because two of its nominees were rejected by the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly, whose consultation is mandatory under the 18th constitutional amendment.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2010.

COMMENTS (20)

Ben | 13 years ago | Reply The drone attacks have become a way of life (or death?) not only for civilians but now also for military men in Pakistan. And these attacks not only target militants’ hideouts, these also rocket Pakistan's military posts. The military which is sacrificing so that Toms, Dicks and Harries and their offspring in the land of milk and honey remain safe, is now target of the fury of all these Toms, Dicks and Harries. And still they ask; "why Pakistanis hate us in spite of our aid?" It is apparent that the American public is largely unaware of the easy-going attitude of American establishment which causes death and destruction elsewhere. But those who know do not like it. The question, however, remains; will the establishment of the US care unless the people of Pakistan practically demonstrate how much they dislike foreign elements threatening their security, and these foreign element include not only Arab, Uzbek and African fighters, these also include Americans of the Black-water variety and those sitting in Washington DC ordering drone attacks. The war in Afghanistan is almost over and so is American hegemony in this unipolar world. Someone somewhere is writing a New world Order yet again. Read more at:link text
Mohammed Abbasi | 13 years ago | Reply lol
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ