Speaking to Peoples Daily Online, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani is reported to have stated that army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief Lt Gen Ahmad Shuja Pasha had not been given approval by the ‘competent authorities’ – in other words the government – before submitting their responses in the Memogate case.
Read together with his referral to remarks made by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry that an act from a government functionary made without a prior nod from the government was unconstitutional, the premier was implying that Kayani and Pasha’s replies to the Supreme Court were illegal, given they did not have clearance.
The prime minister had earlier expressed similar concerns on the same issue when the matter was before the Supreme Court, only to retract them later saying he was mistaken. But now Kayani and Pasha seem willing to appear before and give statements to the court-mandated judicial commission, too.
When pressed by the interviewer, Gilani emphasised that the pair had not taken permission from the defence ministry or the defence minister before submitting their rejoinders.
Gilani also stated that in the two issues which had recently rocked the political and military establishment – the Nato border attacks and Memogate – the civilian and military leadership of Pakistan had considered the matter collectively and taken quick, decisive action. The resignation of Husain Haqqani was also accepted by both civilian and military leaders, Gilani said.
The PM went on to say that the parliamentary committee on national security was dealing with the two issues.
Gilani also expressed his view that it was only after the two issues were taken up by the committee that the Supreme Court took suo motu action on Memogate.
It may be recalled that Kayani is on an official visit to China – a trip during which he has met the Chinese premier. The meeting has raised a number of eyebrows.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 10th, 2012.
COMMENTS (48)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1719745858-0/BeFunky-collage-(1)1719745858-0-165x106.webp "article")
1730893259-0/Untitled-design-(48)1730893259-0-270x192.webp "sindh igp vows to control street crime in karachi")
1730888832-0/Untitled-design-(47)1730888832-0-270x192.webp "mohammad asif becomes world snooker champion for third time")
1730886375-0/Untitled-design-(46)1730886375-0-270x192.webp "pm shehbaz inaugurates model village for flood hit gb residents")
Why cannot this man the PM take a solid stand against corruption and misgovernance also???
The politicians should follow the Constitution and officials should follow the Rules of Business.
Gillani sahab, isn't contempt of court illegal too?
@BruteForce: You talked of US Generals too. If the US Gens have nt bn so strong to say, their politicians hv nt been as corrupt and inapt as ours! Further, US President or Executive can never dare to belittle the Judiciary! Do not try to equate two unequal entities.
@betterwords: I think you need to first understand the structure of Pakistan's Higher Defence Organization and then comment!
@MarkH: Thanks a lot for your advice! We were just missing it.
@R S JOHAR: Look, who's talking!
@Paki-Australian: First come to Pakistan and then talk. Your talk is way off the mark!
@BruteForce: For your raised query you first need to understand the politico-military hierarchical system and chain of command in PLA. Further, where does it happen that an elected PM criticizes one of his most important and respected institutions openly and without any remorse! If he is so helpless why did he not adopt this vociferous attitude earlier? Why did he wait for an allegation that too of treason on him or his Govt to become suddenly candid and venomous? PPP wants to embraced "shahadat" once more to clinch another term in future. They are trying hard to achieve the the Shaheed status either at the hands of Judiciary or unnecessary implicating Armed Forces this time-a political shahadat this time, for a chnage! This politics of "Shahadat" has been their acme since Bhutto. Sometimes it has been a real shahadat but mostly a staged- one. But this time, they have seem to cross all standards of decency and want this status badly even at the cost of our national pride and honour!
@Babloo: What if the entity asking for its approval the accused itself? How bizarre would it be if an accused murderer asks a witness who incidentally is his subordinate to seek murderer's approval before appearing in the court!
@Sindhvoice:
There is no conspiracy against the PPP. Apparently and for a change perhaps, PPP bulwarks are the alleged conspirators this time! Further, the memo matter pertains to alleged treachery and while Judiciary has a lead if Armed Forces are one of the 'fareeqs' to the issue why should the Govt become so touchy? What a good idea is it to impart a conspiracy tinge to anything and everything which holds PPP accountable!
@bruteforce: don't disagree with what you said but just being a devil's advocate - how many times have the representatives and congressmen tried to sell their own country through loot khasoot and everything in between?
@Babloo: PM has to proof is creditability by discarding Haqqani from his house who has created breach in our troika as desired by the USA.Please try to understand how our people are in talash of their rise at any cost.
@Hafeez: it is the creditability of the COAS who has repeatedly ensured the PM and President that army stand behind you,PM is just talking ,our President said once that he will visit CHINA after every three months where is that promise,People like Haqqani and co has hijacked in the name of America who is squeezing everything of this country.Sun rise from East but we are looking west for the last 63 years.Something is very seriously wrong with all of us.
@BruteForce: Are you forgetting how many times American generals have met Zardari and Gillani?
Besides the oft' changing statements of the PM, he had no business to admonish his countries' own military top brass in an interview with the Chinese Newspaper. Well, if he truly felt what he had said he should have taken action against them, instead. The SC judgment today on the NRO case is a clear "writing on the wall". Civillian supremacy is important, but more important is that they (Government) must first put their act togeather. Until then, our Establishment has to and will continue to make sure that our National Interests are safeguarded, at all cost.
No they did not do anything illegal. The SC named them in the order to file a reply so they have to comply or be held in contempt, the SC order did not go to the chief and the ISI via the PM's office. However, the Chief and Pasha submitted their replies thorugh AG's office - so what is illegal. AG is the govt. rep. or is he illegal?
I may agree that their replies should be routed thru govt channels. But do u all agree that govt would send them to SC in court in time and without making any change. If the govt is so "innocent", should they debate on legality of commission or on their defence on memogate. Enough is enough - corruption aur incompetency (N) se chutkara kab milay ga.
What PM is saying is that for submitting replies, any government official, should obtain consent of immediate supervising authority. A government clerk should obtain consent of the department head clerk, a soldier should obtain consent of his commanding officer when responding to matters concerning official business. In case of Kayani , the immediate supervising authority is Gilani, whose consent Mr Kayani should have obtained.
So the PM is saying that army should only tell the truth with his permission. In that case, the constitution should be re-written to close loop holes in law so it cannot be manipulated.
Most irresponsible statement by any PM of any country against his own COAS.
Justice above all! PM saab they were asked by the courts! higher authority than you!
Foregoing the backtracking shots... If you guys really want a democracy then you should be supporting the PM right now. The day they submit to the civilians is going to be brought on by confrontation such as this if they don't want to of their own accord. Though the civilian government will fail miserably in the end if you don't back them up. It may even be now or never with the stakes raising. If you don't want the democracy, well, just keep doing what you're doing. Your choice. It also means no Imran Khan.
SO now he wakes up!!!
PM cant pack them, they are bigger than him, esp when court is also standing with them.
Its appropriate time for the Pak PM to sack the erring military top brass and set a precedence for Pakistan future rulers as well as the military.
@Hafeez Yes and Chinese will trust and have faith in our honest rulers!!
I may not side with PPP, but I side with a constitutionally elected PM of a sovereign state. He represents the people and now genuinely stands to reign in the out of control Army & ISI.
Remember people, politicians represent the people, not army generals. Why should we pay with our sweat & blood for army expenses when all the armed forces want is dominance and the resources to maintain a lifestyle.
People of PK must side with democracy, not the estaishment.
Lest we forget the fruits of Martial law eras of the past!
In any sane country the act of Pasha going to US and meeting this business man will be considered as treason and Pasha would be sacked and prosecuted. Only in pakistan it is happening otherway.
YAY to the Pakistanis standing up for democracy and democratic processes, may the force be with you.
Most of the comments make joke of the statement. On one side we talk about strengthing the democracy and at the same time mimic in sub-standard way on the statements or claims of any leader; ruling or opposition. Its a shame.
@Hafiz Shah Ali: Read again. He did say permission from the PM, but the competent authrities. Which can be different in any individual case.
This is heading for a clash. On other hand he is right.
Mr. PM why don't you fire or resign if your subordinates have file their response without consulting you. This is not true Mr. PM. When two parties (boss & subordinate) is in dispute on a issue, even the subordinate is given the free chance to be heard and defend hi/her position. Please don't play games and don't involve innocent people of Pakistan to shed blood on the streets only for your & PPP's rule. Act in the best interest of Pakistan & its people, this is what we voted for and expect from you.
I hope Supreme court takes notice of this glaring unconstitutional step by the ISI and Army chiefs. And by the way why is our army chief meeting Chinese premiere. It is not his job, it's our PM or President job to do so.
Authority??Sound soo absurd
No they were not ... unless you have something to hide and it seems much clearer with each passing day that this government is NOT telling the truth!!! What information did he not want passed to the SC?
The PM now wants dictatorial powers himself!
"It may be recalled that Kayani is on an official visit to China – a trip during which he has met the Chinese premier. The meeting has raised a number of eyebrows."
What Country's Army Chief meets heads of other states? I don't remember the Indian Army chief ever meeting any premier of any other Country!!
You cannot meet them unless you consider yourself the head of state!
Not true. Rules of business do not prohibit this.
Is it being suggested that every time a Commissioner of Income Tax, a SHO,a collector Custon files a reply in court of law where they are party in official case,they have to get approval from PM?. This is just not the case. PM is on a war path against all institutions of the State just to remain in power and this is just not right or moral or correct.
Bye bye pop goverment
You will soon know who is the real competent authority.
I can't wait to read the comments to this story: 1. "Better for us if we ignore him"; 2. "PM speaks and then thinks"; and the classic comment 3. "PM will claim tomorrow that he has been taken out of context".
Mr Gilani is right. Mr Kayani and Mr Pasha, report to civilian authority as elected by the people of Pakistan and should direct all replies in consultation and with approval of Mr Gilani.
Asking the establishment to go by the book, "approval of the relevant competent authority” sounds very “bizarre”! All are equal but some are more equal than others....
PM takes stand and shows his authority and power he possesses and all pro democracy people welcomes his stand but unfortunately he backtracks very next day. PPP used to be fearless and it faced worst dictators, Jiyalas faced prisons, terror, courts and much more but they never bow down before Military dictatorships. PPP used to be party of principles and pro-people.But today, people from all provinces esp Baluchistan and Sindh who had big expectations from PPP are also unhappy due to poor performance of PPP government. Anyways despite PPP's failure to bring better change in the lives of common man, people are not ready to allow any one to dislodge PPP through some conspiracy or hidden plan. If PPP does not deliver, It is sole right of people of Pakistan to reject PPP or Elect PPP in next Election, it is not the business of any powerful institution to get involved in such affairs.
Without question the Memogate is becoming consistently fascinating.