Memogate: Gilani composed in the face of rumours, opposition

Published: November 25, 2011

Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani addressing the National Assembly session. PHOTO: SANA

ISLAMABAD: The government is either doing its best to appear calm or is disturbingly confident in the face of an issue that could still engulf its incumbency.

Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani spent Thursday in a concerted effort to play down the fallout of the memogate controversy and the reported pressure from the country’s military on the issue – which included a face-off between the premier and the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly.

“If there is any threat, we will look to the people of Pakistan and not to the army,” Gilani said in response to Opposition Leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan’s allegation that the premier and President Asif Ali Zardari had been holding ‘midnight’ meetings with top military leaders to save their government. Nisar chided the government for not taking the parliament into confidence.

The premier’s demeanour towards the opposition’s moving of the Supreme Court for a probe into memogate was almost dismissive. Appearing unconcerned by the move, Gilani told the National Assembly that he would ‘soon’ constitute a committee to investigate who was involved in the sending of a controversial memo to the then chief of the US military.

The failure to give a timeframe or any concrete details two days after first announcing the probe is in marked contrast to the urgency with which the opposition is pushing the issue and the rumours regarding a rift between the civilian and military leadership.

He also assured all around him that there was no pressure from the military to act on the matter – which led to the sacking of Ambassador to US Hussain Haqqani – and that the government was acting on its own behest. He added that the civilian and military leadership was on the same page on the matter.

“I’m forming a committee for an impartial inquiry to satisfy the nation, the parliament and the opposition,” Gilani said in a speech to the National Assembly after Nisar accused the government of trying to “sweep the issue under the carpet”.

Nisar termed the resignation by Haqqani an incident of “serious consequences” and claimed he had credible information that the government moved on the matter only after a threat by both the military and intelligence chiefs.

He said Haqqani had expressed a desire to fly back to Washington but was denied permission on the orders of some ‘powerful institutions’. While Gilani denied that he moved after the military’s pressure fell on him, he did not comment on whether Haqqani had actually been stopped from travelling abroad.

“I sought a resignation from Haqqani to make sure that the inquiry into the matter is impartial,” the premier said in an apparent bid to justify the move.

Later in the National Assembly, Nisar said that the appointment of a new ambassador within hours of Haqqani’s ‘removal’ was an indication that the government considered him guilty and did not plan to restore him.

“He (Haqqani) was an ambassador and had contacts in the US. He might have not needed a link to deliver the message,” Gilani explained.

Nisar later led a boycott of members from his Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N).

Clearance for Sherry

Earlier in the day, prime minister denied reports that he had appointed MNA Sherry Rehman as Pakistan’s new ambassador in Washington only after the military cleared her name for the slot. He also said the military had not asked him to sack Haqqani.

“It was my prerogative and, of course, my decision as well,” he told journalists after addressing a ceremony.

Even before the National Assembly, the premier took great pains to stress that the government was not facing any threat – from the military or from the opposition.

Speaking to the media after addressing the concluding session of 2nd International Islamic Women Police Conference on Thursday, Gilani said that a high-level committee will soon start a probe into the memo scandal and assured that the investigation would be held in a fair manner.

(Read: Our civil-military contradictions)

Published in The Express Tribune, November 25th, 2011.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Related Videos

Reader Comments (6)

  • Pakistani
    Nov 25, 2011 - 2:03AM

    Gilani Sb…one question…aap ko awam,opposition, parliament,democracy us waqat kyun yaad ati ha jaab naukri jana wali hoti ha?

    Recommend

  • F Khan
    Nov 25, 2011 - 2:06AM

    He just bucked under army pressure and gave HH scalp without an inquiry…..now is playing to the galleries….typical multani behavior…doubly doubly.

    Recommend

  • fahim
    Nov 25, 2011 - 2:53AM

    peer sahab, questions from people are like ethopian kids asking for apple pie. you can ask question to your son how he got 10 million worth car in gift..

    Recommend

  • Cautious
    Nov 25, 2011 - 4:02AM

    stressing that the civil and military leadership were on the same page on every issue,
    If true then it’s only because the military is making them toe the line.Recommend

  • ksri
    Nov 25, 2011 - 11:48AM

    The entire memogate is turning out to be murky affair. Resignation of HH is not the end of the story. A judicial commission empowered to conduct the investigation without fear or favor is absolutely necessary. People of Pakistan deserve to know the truth.

    Recommend

  • Ahmad
    Nov 25, 2011 - 2:19PM

    “If there is any threat, we will look to the people of Pakistan and not to the army,” Gilani said ..

    With what face???

    Recommend

More in Pakistan