Sentences passed: Teammates to inmates

Indignant judge in no mood for leniency; Amir and Butt to appeal.


Agencies November 04, 2011

LONDON:


Last night, the Pakistan cricket team went to bed wondering how to take the remaining eight Sri Lankan wickets on a flat pitch in Sharjah.


Miles away, Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir lay awake behind bars in London, wondering where it had all gone wrong.

Judge Jeremy Cooke sentenced Butt to 30 months, Asif one year, and their corrupt agent Mazhar Majeed two years and eight months for spot-fixing during the August 2010 Lord’s Test match. Amir was sentenced to six months in a young offenders’ institute.

Amir and Majeed’s guilty pleas, the court heard, had reduced their sentences; the players’ bans from the ICC were also taken into account.

Justice Cooke punctuated his judgment with cutting condemnation, reacting with indignation to the damage they had inflicted on the sport and rebuking them severely for their “greed”.

“These offences, regardless of pleas, are so serious that only a sentence of imprisonment will suffice,” the judge said. The sentences will almost certainly be reduced to half the terms, following good behaviour.

Amir and Butt intend to appeal.

Butt was told to pay £30,937, Amir £9,389, and Asif £8,120 towards the prosecution costs, money which is already in police hands. Majeed was ordered to pay £56,554 within six months.

Majeed collected his suitcase as he was led from the dock, while Asif nodded to a friend in the public gallery before disappearing down to the cells. Butt looked aghast; Amir sunken, a painful contrast to his customary sprightliness on the cricket pitch.

Judge without sympathy

Justice Cooke said the players were motivated solely by personal gain, despite the fortunes they could earn legitimately, and said he hoped the sentences would deter other cricketers and agents from following their “hugely detrimental” example.

The judge also condemned the “insidious effect” of their actions on the sport of cricket itself, “the very name of which used to be associated with fair dealing.” Any surprising event in a cricket match will now be suspect to suspicion, he added.

Justice Cooke reserved his most caustic attack for Butt, who he called the “orchestrator” of fixing within the Pakistan team. He said that given his “leadership status”, he was “more culpable than either of your two bowlers.” The judge also partially blamed Butt for luring Amir, “an 18-year-old from a poverty-stricken village background”, into the scandal.

In an unsettling comment for world cricket, the judge said Majeed, Butt and Amir had clearly discussed fixing outside the sting, terming the case “the tip of the iceberg.” Referring specifically to Asif, he said: “There’s no evidence on your part of prior fixing but it’s hard to see that this could have been an isolated incident.”

Amir tight-lipped as family weeps

I have a lot to say about Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif, but my legal team has stopped me from doing so,” Mohammad Amir told a private TV channel in an interview recorded prior to the sentencing. Amir added that he will disclose more information “when the time is right.”

At her home in Changa Bangial, near Islamabad, Amir’s mother Nasim Akhtar wept on hearing the sentence. “My son is innocent and he did the no-ball at the asking of the captain,” she said.

“He should not have been sentenced after his confession. We were under the impression that he would be released after the imposition of a fine,” said Amir’s brother, 26-year-old Mohammad Ijaz.

Reactions: from the emotional to the bizarre

In Lahore, Butt’s sisters spoke to reporters to defend their brother and claimed he had been made a scapegoat for a wider conspiracy. “The punishment is unfair, it is shocking. Our brother is innocent,” said Khadija outside the family home.

Such fortitude – or delusion – might perhaps be expected from family members. From high-ranking government officials, it is somewhat surprising. Following the news, Interior Minister Rehman Malik vowed that the government will defend the players if they are found innocent, seemingly blind to the guilty verdicts in both the ICC and criminal court hearings.

Talking to the media outside parliament, Malik said that the government will see if the charges against the players are true or if there is a conspiracy against them.

Later, following a meeting with British High Commissioner to Pakistan Adam Thomson, Malik said that a team of the Federal Investigation Agency accompanied by solicitors will go to London to help and assist the three sentenced cricketers.

“The FIA team will see the cases of the cricketers and examine if they could be helped in any way,” said the interior minister.

In his meeting with the high commissioner, the minister requested him to provide the Pakistan government with details of the cases.

(Read: An expected sentencing)

Published in The Express Tribune, November 4th, 2011. 

COMMENTS (37)

lady Gaga | 12 years ago | Reply

Excellent british justice - the CJ of pakistan should take note of how real justice takes place. it does not matter who you are or what your status or religion - if you break the law you pay the price. Why cant our justice system do the same.

Khan | 12 years ago | Reply

Kamran Akmal:- Pakistan vs Australia January 2010. Kamran Akmal dropped three catches and missed an easy run-out of Michael Hussey who was on 33. Hussey went on to score 134 not out and Australia won the match .. I wonder how much was he paid for throwing a full match ... must have earn between 50 lac to 2 crore within 5 days? Wahaz Riaz:- The footage clearly showed him taking Mazhar Majeed's jacket full of £10,000 inside its pocket.. and then showing it to these guys .. Sure, no one gives a jacket full of money to any one without any reason let alone having such a huge amount. Why was Wahab Riaz left out of investigation. Ijaz Butt PCB Chairman:- Mr Butt defended these cheats and never bothered to investigate any one involved in these cases and was never able to catch any one despite clear signs of corruption. Later even went to blame ECB without any proof just to apologize later on. For his age and experience one would expect a chairman to be mature enough to know speak without proof but either he with them in it or was too naive for the position. Wajid Shamsul Hasan A person representing on such high post in a major world country and with such experience one would again expect these people to be sensible, mature, practical and educated enough to know black from white. Honorable high commissioner over stepped his responsibility as high commissioner and got involved in cricket controversy .. just like Mr Butt defended these corrupt players and without any proof said they were framed and are innocent thus bringing more shame to us. If our Interior ministers and Diplomats are of this caliber what else can we expect from our leaders. No one bothered to ask him why he spoke that way without any solid proof, just to defame Pakistan further. Rehman Malik:- The FIA team will see the cases of the cricketers and examine if they could be helped in any way,” said the interior minister. Do I need to say more? Instead of sending a team to see the evidence and punish those player involved in bringing disgrace to this country he is helping them? If you help are murder you are involved equally if you shelter a thief or criminal in the eyes of Law you have committed a crime too. Dr sahib should know that he will not be on this position for rest of his life and one day he will be held responsible for what ever these people are doing to this nation and country. Wasim Akram:- A legend indeed but just wondering if one no ball in a test match gets you 10 lac how much you get for a one day match doing dozen no balls ? He was very famous for giving away extras in matches and had played many huge matches ... Must be billionaire by now. Sure he was not an ameture player to be giving away so many extras and not able to address the problem in 20 years long career .. He wasn't a horse to control his run up but a professional player.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ