“We’ve got no illusions about what the Haqqanis ultimately are,” said a senior US official said. But the “war is going to end with a deal. That’s what we’re trying to make inevitable. The more parties are involved in talking, the better the deal is likely to be.”
The official declined to discuss the talks with the Haqqanis, describing them as “early and not very well defined.”
The senior US official said there had been at least one meeting over the summer between US officials and Haqqani representatives, adding that the meeting was set up by spy agency ISI.
The meeting took place as the Haqqanis were stepping up attacks in and around Kabul, but before their most high-profile strike to date, the assault on the US embassy, which began on Sept 13.
The assault made the effort to talk to the Haqqanis more difficult, but the effort to get a peace process going has not been abandoned, officials said.
The State Department would not comment directly on outreach to the Haqqanis. Spokesman Mark Toner, citing previous comments by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said: “We have a broad range of contacts across Afghanistan and the region … these contacts are preliminary in nature.”
A Pakistani official said Islamabad began facilitating contacts with the Haqqanis late last year and set up the meeting this summer in a Persian Gulf country. The Afghan government did not take part, WSJ reported.
The US would not identify the participants; the Pakistani official said the insurgents were represented by one of the brothers of the main leader of the network, Sirajuddin Haqqani.
Sirajuddin told the BBC in an interview published on Monday that “not only Pakistan, but other Islamic countries, and other non-Islamic countries, including America, contacted us and they are still doing so.” He claimed that the US had asked him to break with Taliban leader Mullah Omar and join Hamid Karzai’s government.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 6th, 2011.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Waiting eagerly for comments by Mirza, Cautious, naryana murthy, ashok, John B, etc.
All Indians ran away because they dont want to upset their new master Uncle Sam..
All Hindu RSS Terrorists have disappeared from this Forum after this News. After this, There is no argument left. These Hindu terrorists are no fiends of Muslims . Recognize these terrorist sand 50% job i done.
Might is right.
Lest we forget:
The Iran–Contra affair also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or Iran-Contra-Gate, was a political scandal in the United States that came to light in November 1986. During the Reagan administration, senior Reagan administration officials and President Reagan secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the subject of an arms embargo. Some U.S. officials also hoped that the arms sales would secure the release of hostages and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The scandal was composed of arms sales to Iran in violation of the official US policy of an arms embargo against Iran, and of using funds thus generated to arm and train the Contra militants based in Honduras as they waged a guerilla war to topple the government of Nicaragua
Wonder.......there is no one from my beloved Indian side to comment on this item.Come on be a sport...
@Aamir: You have very confidence in CIA...well GOD save Pakistan
Another acknowledgement of defeat by the Americans, they are trying to negotiate from a weak position and seeking Pakistan's help to pressure the resistance... Karzai Monmohan honeymoon is just smoke screen.. Only Pakistan has ace card in this game!
What a double game. On the one hand blame Pakistan for failures in Afghanistan and on the other negotiate with the same group. Height of duplicity and confusion. US better put your house in order, fight your own battle and do not try to make Pakistan a scapegoat. History reveals that Afghanistan has always been the grave yard of aggressor, better quit before you run like you did in Vietnam
Taliban refuses to talk and get into agreement while US forcing them to to talk peace with them ! What a scenario !!
It is double gaming THE US STYLE. No Shame, US can do anything and get away with it. Pakistan should also choose for itself an Afghan policy independent of US demands.
Aamir
How do you know that CIA is not doing the same? In this world, everything is possible.
This is not the same as supporting Haqqani Network, which ISI is doing.
they talked, they accused and now they are killing them in afghanistan.( 2 aide and commanders down) haqqanis are doomed to see the fate of obl. us will leave but with minimum possibility of coming back
In simple words, Pakistani can't have link with "terrorists" while US can. World is so unfair.
Yes CIA can have links with terrorist groups but God help you if someone else have .... the whole thing is a joke.
So, this means CIA has links with terrorist groups too. So, by their own definition, they are supporter of terrorism and destabilizing Afghanistan. :->
Now, will the US toady Indians & Indian's toady Pakistanis on this forum speak now, please?
Nothing new, please work on something new.
Where are my indian friends with their comments on this news item?
When both US and Pak have links with Haqqani's then better to talk rather than blaming each other. US must come to the solution rather than finding scapegoat.
There is some game beneath the US-PAK rift. NawazSharif was right at the APC. There is something fishy.
Hahahahaha
US could not fight them and thus it is finding ways tobring them to talks
lol Hypocrites