Alerts
 
< >

Denying WikiLeaks disclosure: ‘Kayani sought US drone support only for surveillance’

Published: May 21, 2011

ISPR spokesperson says only technical intelligence sharing had been done in the past.

ISLAMABAD: 

Officials familiar with the January 22, 2008 meeting between Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani and then US CENTCOM head Admiral William J Fallen confirmed that the Pakistan Army had asked for “drone support” – but only for surveillance of the tribal areas.

Requesting anonymity the officials said without referring to the January 2008 meeting that the issue of drone support had been a frequent subject of meetings between the military brass from both Pakistan and the United States.

“There are two types of drones: one is for surveillance and the other for missile strikes,” explained a military official saying that the Pakistani military only sought the US help for reconnaissance.

The fresh US diplomatic cables leaked by secret-busting Web site Wikileaks revealed that in the Jan 22 meeting with top US military commander, Gen Kayani had asked for “continuous predator coverage” over the tribal areas.

“Referring to the situation in Waziristan,” a February 11, 2008 cable says, “Kayani asked if Fallon could assist in providing continuous Predator coverage of the conflict area.”

The Pakistan Army denied the report, saying no armed drone support had ever been sought. Clarifying the position, the military spokesperson said that in the past, there had only been sharing of technical intelligence in some areas.

“During Swat-Malakand Operation, Rah-e-Rast, in 2008-09, and South Waziristan Agency operation, Rah-e-Nijat, in 2009-10, not even outside technical support was asked for,” he added. These operations were jointly conducted by the Pakistan Army and Pakistan Air Force, the spokesperson added.

Despite strong opposition to the drones from the civil and military leadership, it is widely believed that Pakistan and the US have some kind of understanding on the use of unmanned predators to take out ‘high value targets’ associated with al Qaeda and its affiliates in the tribal belt.

Last year, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani revealed for the first time that the former military ruler General (retd) Pervez Musharraf had allowed the US drones only for surveillance.

But official sources say that the two countries have an understanding that the armed drones will be used if there is actionable intelligence on ‘high value targets.’

One such example of this cooperation was the killing of the Tehreek-e-Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud in a US drone attack of August 2009.

The key human intelligence for the Pakistan’s most wanted man’s hideout was provided by the country’s spy agencies to the US. However, the US subsequently ignored the ‘actual understanding’ and expanded the drone campaign by targeting the suspects besides the real ‘high value targets.’

The reason behind the unprecedented increase in the drone strikes in the last three years was that the CIA had established a strong network of its local operatives in the tribal areas, which provide the necessary human intelligence.

“The drones are flying from the Pakistani bases, so there is no doubt that the US is carrying out drone strikes with our permission,” commented former diplomat Rustam Shah Mehmond.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 21st, 2011.


on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (22)

  • Lobster
    May 20, 2011 - 3:58PM

    Yeah right. As if we don’t know the capabilities of Pakistani Air Force (specially the radars)Recommend

  • May 20, 2011 - 4:02PM

    I Love the timming of Amercians, Believe it or not, they are too good to change the perception of Ordinary Pakistani.Recommend

  • May 20, 2011 - 4:18PM

    ISPR: when have you actually confirmed anything?

    Everything is an army matter – we will take your money, but give you no answers

    While you are making statements what happend into the inquiry into the shooting of captured TTP videos that came out? What happend to the investigation into NLC scam?Recommend

  • Ahmed
    May 20, 2011 - 4:24PM

    Dear mentoring skill, i think you shud mentor yourself from living in denial. Do you know that drone attacks are going on in pak? & do you belive it can happen without approval of army? In parliament, it was told that they fly from shamsi base which is under UAE Govt control. Yet you live in denial. May god help you!Recommend

  • cautious
    May 20, 2011 - 4:25PM

    My money is on Wikileaks – they have a record for being spot on – can’t say the same for ISI.Recommend

  • IWriteURead
    May 20, 2011 - 4:25PM

    Once again gora trying “Divide and rule policy.”

    ISPR has rightly pointed out that the leak doesnt speak if whether missile carrying predators were requested or simple surveillance materialRecommend

  • ashok sai
    May 20, 2011 - 4:40PM

    Here comes the favorite DENIAL.Recommend

  • M.Akthar
    May 20, 2011 - 4:47PM

    Only a complete buffoon would shout foul at this truth. Its just not possible that USA can conduct drone without approval of the Army. Please dont shame yourself guys, grow up.Recommend

  • Adeel
    May 20, 2011 - 4:53PM

    wow ISPR was quick on this!!Recommend

  • Rana
    May 20, 2011 - 4:55PM

    Does any one believe ISPR ? Baton for country men and Salute for Uncle SamRecommend

  • saleem khan
    May 20, 2011 - 6:23PM

    ISPR is so quick to respond to this, HahahahaRecommend

  • Tariq
    May 20, 2011 - 6:27PM

    The leaks were made a year back, so stop blaming the US look in the mirrorRecommend

  • Lobster
    May 20, 2011 - 7:13PM

    @TightDhoti:
    good point!Recommend

  • san
    May 20, 2011 - 8:24PM

    deny deny deny…thats the only job they are good at…Recommend

  • QB
    May 20, 2011 - 8:37PM

    US and Wikileaks have completely exposed our politicians and army. They are all the same. Its good that army is having to face the reality. They can not win any war as long as they keep cheating on their own people.Recommend

  • Mirza
    May 20, 2011 - 9:26PM

    The drone attacks need targets. Who is supplying them with the lists of targets? Not the Americans by themselves. Why does the US give billions to Pakistan army? Not for the love of “Islamic Republic of Pakistan army”.

    It is obvious that the country was broken during the martial law and once again when OBL was provided a safe haven in an army base it was the rule of army dictator Mush. Recommend

  • Rana Asghar
    May 20, 2011 - 9:55PM

    ISPR Sure, we believe you! Recommend

  • Aftab Kenneth Wilson
    May 21, 2011 - 12:32AM

    Mr. ISPR should we believe you as hypnotized rabbits????Recommend

  • Aamer Khawaja
    May 21, 2011 - 2:40AM

    ISPR, trying denying that in front of Uncle samRecommend

  • May 21, 2011 - 5:19AM

    That’s a pretty drone in the picture!Recommend

  • BruteForce
    May 21, 2011 - 8:09AM

    If somebody told somebody else that you were stealing something and that somebody else confronted you would you accept it? You would deny it like there is no tomorrow!

    Why on earth would the Army shoot its own foot. Its more likely to use its Urdu media friends into believing that Wikileaks is fake, not mentioning the fact that these leaks represent internal Cables of the US Government hacked by Julian Assange, as a result of which he is being hunted down!

    A few months ago when the news came that Rahul Gandhi had said that Hindu Terror is greater threat to India than any Jihadi Terror, all Pakistan had believed Wikileaks and pointed at India and laughed, as if the opinion of one man can be considered the ultimate truth.

    Now, why everyone is speaking in opposite terms? Make up your mind. If you had accepted that Wikileaks was genuine, why do you, after it exposed you army, changed your mind? Stop being duplicitous! Recommend

  • Yaqub
    May 21, 2011 - 9:59AM

    When spies visit a foreign land and take information that is a breach of sovereignity too. How is drones for surveillance not a breach of sovereignity.Recommend

More in Pakistan