Share this article
Print this page
The writer is contributing editor, The Friday Times (mehreen.malik@tribune.com.pk)
The impending clash of the judiciary with the government could lead to a systemic collapse. The struggle against militancy is showing little sign of singleminded commitment on the part of the government and no signs of end. And if these battles aren’t enough, Pakistan is now preoccupied with another one: against Facebook, YouTube and over 400 other sites.
There is no doubt that the content the PTA has tried to block is objectionable and government action may have helped ward off violence on the streets. But do the courts and the government really understand how to negotiate a world that exists beyond the streets, online where non-violent protests against a juvenile web campaign are possible? How does the decision to do away with 25 per cent of internet traffic reflect on their understanding, or lack thereof, of the social and cultural changes brought about by new technologies? Do they realise that what they are curtailing not just the responsibility but also the opportunity of Pakistanis to engage with this issue; to come together with Muslims around the world, on Facebook itself, to express their indignation and to take the opportunity to appraise the world of the positive significance of the Prophet (pbuh)?
This is the reality of an instant, online world: that protests against Facebook take place on Facebook itself; that one needs access to Facebook in order to protest its transgressions; that while banning Facebook appeases Muslims around the world, it also implicitly allows for the violent reactions of extremists instead of pushing them to calibrate their responses. The concept of free speech can be protected and combatted only with more free speech, not less.
The courts don’t understand these paradoxes. For once, they’ve taken swift action and want to be patted on the back for that. But if there’s anything we’ve learnt from this issue, it is that through a certain kind of framing – by the media, political leaders or protesters – certain issues are designated as ‘crises’, as problems that need immediate attention. And as much as one wouldn’t expect it from Pakistani governments or courts, swift action is taken. When we really want to get things done, they get done.
So this is for the courts, the political parties, the leaders and the citizens who have never taken seriously the reform of the law; who have failed to educate themselves and others on the values of pluralism; who have resisted focusing political attention and economic resources on educating women; and who have taken too long to begin fighting extremism on multiple fronts. This is a call to all those who think things can’t get done in Pakistan; to all those who are, or aspire to be, some part of the fight for human rights, freedom of speech and rule of law in this country; to all those who take seriously the fact that Pakistan is not Iran, or China. At least some part of this battle can be fought through organised communication online, a more viable option than violence or silence.
Facebook has emerged unscathed, as it has from numerous user protests in its six-year history. But if anyone is in a more precarious situation now than before this drama began, it’s Pakistan. The Facebook ban is not the answer.
Published in the Express Tribune, May 27th, 2010.
More in Opinion
Understanding Faisal Shahzad
Ms. Mehreen Malik has raised a very sensitive issue that needs to be discussed with an unbiased and positive attitude. She is right in suggesting that ‘at least some part of this battle can be fought through organised communication online, a more viable option than violence or silence’.
In my humble opinion, we have failed, in the past, in resolving similar problems due to non-existence of effective and influential think tanks.
Prophet Muhammad (sall-Allah-o-alaih-e-wassallam)set a number of examples for us to follow in dealing with certain sensitive issues with strategic planning and rational thinking.
Simply banning and blocking websites is certainly not a permanent resolution of such challenges that Muslim Ummah is facing these days.
I suggest that senior media gurus of the whole Islamic world should gather to establish an independent think tank to watch, discuss and settle burning issues that cause tremors in the hearts and minds of Muslims and finally explode like volcanic eruptions.
I appreciate Ms. Mehreen’s courage to initiate this debate which should not be ignored and evaded. I am sanguine that religious scholars, intellectuals, jurists and socio-political analysts should come forward to participate in this debate and express their views without an intention of scoring valueless points.Recommend
The ban was the only way one could claim victory over a foreign private enterprise. Any, non-confrontational effort on taking on the blasphemers in an open rational debate would have been construed as appeasement. The ban not only expressed our rage; according to some even managed to seriously dent the revenue stream of Facebook itself (allegedly). The ban was necessary as it appeased those who were protesting on the street and would have resorted to violence and destroying public property. This ban was not for Facebook, but for our own consumption.Recommend
I repeat:
The main question here is why is it that an Osama Bin Laden fan page with barely 1,000 members formed on 25th March was deleted on 17 April this year when this group or event of whatever that had a far too much controversy playing in news media globally gets to go into the realm of Freedom of Speech?
Facebook is very different from YouTube or Flickr in this regard as those two have shown instant responses in removing certain offensive videos and pictures as soon as reported whilst Facebook has terms of use but enforces them ONLY WHEN IT CHOOSES.
We’re just throwing a little tantrum here at not being heard.
Secondly people here just need a reason to get violent – for no reason despite McDonalds’ Golden Arches being a real symbol of America – we decide to torch KFC everytime.
So the banning it was a good thing because it shows people of Pakistan that yes we are insignificant and we don’t matter enough to be listened to but yes we did at the state level do our utmost to defend the dignity of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) and banned Facebook albeit for a while. This little inconvenience to us was enough to get it noticed on a global level.
People don’t take to torching the streets because they feel okay – these buggers might not be cutting back on prices and giving us ‘bijli’ etc. yet the courts and the government agencies took some stern action where it came to dignity of RasulAllah (S.A.W).
I think something should be looked at in terms of ground realities and the reality is that if the ban hadn’t taken place we would have had a real set of riots and quite a few casualties.Recommend
What People seem to forget is that the ban serves no purpose. This will only allow more people to mock at Islam.
The Islamic card don’t work , perhaps the ruling in Islam regarding such provocation (i mentioned this ruling before but my comment was moderated) is nearly impossible to implement even if one considers boycotting as the ‘least’ thing he could do. Islamic rulings are perfect , anyone who enjoins his thoughts to it only leads to more mockery (as in this case).
When was the Last time a Lahore High Court decision was implemented within hours of its judgement? Clearly the government seeks its own interest in every matter , i can challenge anyone on any forum to prove if the facebook ban is in the name of Islam or if one can prove me that Islam asks one to boycott any nation. Muslims have fought wars but never have they boycotted the goods of that nation – the trade went on.
Had Islam been the reason , then Facebook should have been banned earlier on the basis of spreading ‘fahasha’ (Obscenity). The very notion of Boycott itself is a western thought , hypocrisy is that one calls this an Islamic boycott and the Mullahs jump in.
Why not ban Google? Porns? the internet?
I wish somehow i can also create a chain of email informing the ‘Ummah’ regarding these mislead policies which makes mockery of Islam. I did not expect such fatwas coming from respected personalities.
Yes ban facebook forever, ban porns and heavily censor the internet if it is really for Islam on the basis of Obscenity.Recommend
A clash between two important state pillars even in any developed country would lead to a vacuum, let alone a country like Pakistan. We must not create circumstances which lead to such a catastrophe. Democracy has to survive and survive for good.Recommend