MQM amends constitution, won't seek Altaf's endorsement over decisions

Omits relevant clauses from party's constitution; adds four members in Rabita Committee


Zubair Ashraf/news Desk September 01, 2016
Express News screen grab of MQM leader Farooq Sattar

KARACHI: Days after Farooq Sattar announced a complete disconnect with the Muttahida Qaumi Movement chief, the party has amended its constitution, and will no longer seek guidance from Altaf Hussain over its decisions.

“The Rabita Committee has decided to omit Article 9B from MQM’s constitution, which stated the Rabita Committee will require Altaf Hussain's guidance and consultation for its decisions,” Sattar told reporters after a party's consultative meeting in Karachi on Thursday.

Will not accept 'minus Altaf' formula, asserts Wasay Jalil

The decision was taken after Altaf’s August 22 anti-Pakistan speech, which was followed by a Sindh-wide crackdown against the MQM. Scores of party leaders, workers were detained while a number of its offices were subsequently sealed and demolished.

Sattar also announced the inclusion of four leaders into the Rabita Committee.

“Sardar Ahmad, Khalid Maqbool, Khuwaja Sohail Mansoor, and Rauf Siddiqui have been included in the Committee,” he said.

The senior leader said the party was now independent, both from any pressure from inside the country or from the decisions made from London, and was taking its decisions freely.







 



COMMENTS (3)

Iftikhar Ahmed Chaudhry | 8 years ago | Reply This is all symbolic and cosmetic attempt to befool Pakistani people. MQM & Rabta committee can never disassociate themselve from their supremo utill and unless he dies. The minus one is a new kind of hypocrisy.
MJ | 8 years ago | Reply If this is not just symbolic and an attempt to alleviate the pressure, then we really need to listen to Farooq Sattar's plea for providing him with beefed up security.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ