PHOTO: AFP
Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) President and International Cricket Council (ICC) Chairman Shashank Manohar on Thursday criticised the imbalance of power in the ICC, saying the cricket body's revamp amounted to 'bullying' by the Big Three.
Cricket's global governing body approved wide-ranging changes last year, effectively placing the Big Three in charge of the game, while promising more revenues for everyone. The revamp entitled the three powerful nations to permanent seats in the executive committee while former Indian cricket board (BCCI) president Narayanaswami Srinivasan took over as the ICC chairman.
"I don't agree with the three major countries bullying the ICC," said Manohar.
"That's my personal view, because as I have always said, an institution is bigger than individuals. You cannot guarantee which individual will occupy the top position in either of these countries," he added.
Where are the people who supported Big Three for India series, asks Aamir Sohail
“And, the ICC constitution, as it stands today, says that in all the major committees of the ICC, these three countries will be automatically there. So all the financial and commercial aspects and the executive committee will be controlled by the representatives of these three countries, which according to me is wrong."
Manohar said there are several faults in the ICC which he hopes to rectify during his term as the governing body's chairman, which ends in June 2016.
Further, Manohar said, “You should have the best man, whether he comes from Zimbabwe, or West Indies, or even from an associate or affiliate to work on a committee, who will promote the interests of the ICC."
Manohar replaced Srinivasan as the ICC chairman earlier this month. Srinivasan was seen as the main architect behind the Big Three plan which was passed by the ICC board last February.
India must reward Pakistan for supporting ‘Big Three’: PCB
In an interview with ESPN Cric Info in 2014, Srinivasan had said it was wrong to see the revamp as a takeover of the ICC by the BCCI, ECB and CA. "If I had to sum it up, I will say the proposal gives financial stability to nations who play cricket," Srinivasan had said.
However, the current ICC chief opposed the revenue-sharing formula. "I don't agree with the revenue-sharing formula, because it's nice to say that India (BCCI) will get 22% of the total revenue of the ICC, but you cannot make the poor poorer and the rich richer, only because you have the clout. The ICC runs cricket throughout the world."
"Secondly there is another angle to it which nobody has thought of. India generates money because the other countries come and play in India. If you do not have a fierce competition, the broadcasters are not going to pay you and the sponsors are not going to sponsor your events.
Manohar went on to say, “So whatever you generate through bilateral series is because there are good teams playing against you. If all teams are of the standards of the low placed ninth and tenth team and India is a good side, who is going to pay you; what interest would be left with the spectators to watch a game, if it's a one-sided game always. So if you reduce their corpus, their development is going to be hampered and ICC has to think from that point of view."
India's attitude changed after inclusion in Big Three: Javed Miandad
The BCCI president also expressed dissatisfaction at the possibility of conflict of interest because of dual roles held by officials at the ICC and at their home board. "According to me there is a conflict now at the ICC level, which I have to sort out,” said Manohar.
“Under the present ICC constitution, the chairmanship is offered to the representative of the BCCI. Under the ICC constitution, after the annual conference, there is going to be an election and the person who is elected the chairman will continue only till the time he continues to be the representative of his country."
"So tomorrow here could be a scenario, wherein 'A' person is elected the chairman and after 10 days he is removed by his board, 'B' would take over as the chairman, and after four months that person is removed, 'C' would take over as chairman. When people vote, they vote for an individual; they don't vote for a member board.
“It's the competence of a person to lead the ICC is important, and keeping that in mind, people vote for him. According to me that clause is also a bad clause.”
Manohar also believes that holding two offices will lead an individual to bias attitude towards decision making, as the individual will be more careful about protecting the domestic interest, than protect the interest of the game at the Global level.
"When I am at the ICC as a BCCI representative, it's my paramount duty to protect the interests of the BCCI; then how can I protect the interests of the ICC, sitting as its chairman?” ask Manohar.
“If there is a conflict between the interest of the BCCI and the ICC, I will have to protect the interest of the BCCI. Then I am failing in my duty, sitting there as chairman of the ICC and not protecting its interests.
"So according to me there are many flaws in the ICC constitution, which was amended, because earlier the president's post was occupied by a person who had nothing to do with any board.
“The first requirement was he had to resign from his home board from all positions; with the result that he was not attending the ICC meetings as a representative of a member board. David Morgan, [Sharad] Pawar, Alan Issac, they resigned from their offices to sit as ICC presidents. This is a unique situation which has been created because of the amendment which creates, according to me, a direct conflict."
Manohar, who is a lawyer by profession, said that he already discussed these issues with ECB president Giles, who agreed with him.
"I have spoken about these issues to Giles Clarke (ECB) and he agreed with me."
When asked if he would propose other ICC board members to revise their decision regarding the Big Three revamp which was taken last year, the ICC chairman said he was speaking in his individual capacity and that he does not know what the future holds.
"I don't agree with that in principle. I am talking about myself. I don't know what will happen in the future." concluded Manohar.
The article originally appeared on ESPN Cric Info.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ