
But if you think this is the case because Zuckerberg is the boss of the social media network, you’re wrong. The real reason is not vanity or a glitch in the system. Instead it is a feature that kicks in when a lot of people try to block a profile.
Facebook sets up safety check for Paris friends
Mashable, in 2010, discovered this when they asked Facebook why they get this message:

“[This error] is generated when a person has been blocked a certain large number of times,” a Facebook spokesperson told Mashable. “In very rare instances, a viral campaign will develop instructing lots of people to all wrongly block the same person.”
Facebook tests vanishing messages
The spokesperson explained that the purpose of the feature is to protect the experience of the person targeted by such campaigns.
This would mean that Zuckerberg is constantly the target of a viral campaign, an proposition. However, the Mashable piece also notes that blockzuck.com, a viral campaign to mass-block Zuckerberg was the first to bring attention to the Zuckerberg's unblockable status.
Many took to Twitter after several failed attempts to block Zuckerberg:
How is this fair? Mark Zuckerberg is scared. is Facebook dying? https://t.co/3KNINGwQWQ
— Matt Willett (@M_Willett) November 11, 2015
Have you tried blocking Mark Zuckerberg on his page ? ...... #Facebook #android #app go to https://t.co/NrXa2OIzfS
— Andre Abouzzaty (@andrebuklaw) November 5, 2015
Don't even think of blocking #MarkZukerberg on #Facebook. I tried: https://t.co/lQQjhVmjAS pic.twitter.com/GiItg46IR2
— Chung Kai Lim (@ChungKaiLim) November 6, 2015
I think #facebook has dug up lots of problems by blocking #Tsu links.
— Sachin S. Kar (@SachinSKar) November 7, 2015
It proves how paranoid #MarkZuckerberg is with even slight competition
Try blocking mark Zuckerberg you won't be able to its funny trick try it.
— Adeel Abbas🇵🇰 (@im_adeel) November 8, 2015
This article originally appeared on Mashable
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ