Pakistani passport still among worst in the world: report

In 2014, Pakistan was ranked at 92, along with Somalia


Web Desk October 15, 2015
PHOTO: FILE

The Pakistani passport this month dropped 14 places in the global travel ranking making it one of the worst passports to travel with, a report revealed.

The Visa Restrictions Index 2015, prepared by Henley & Partners, ranked Pakistan at 106th, making it one of four of the worst passports in the world.

With Pakistan's passport among the least desirable, Somalia, Iraq and Afghanistan followed closely behind at 107, 108 and 109 respectively. Meanwhile, the report places India at 87 and Bangladesh at 98.

Read: Pakistani passport remains among worst to travel with: Visa Restriction Index

The Henley & Partners Visa Restrictions Index is a global ranking of countries according to the travel freedom that their citizens enjoy. he index is produced in cooperation with the International Air Transport Association (IATA), which maintains the world’s largest database of travel information, and is published annually. The amount of nationalities evaluated is 199.

In 2014, Pakistan was ranked at 92, sharing the spot with Somalia, with citizens of both countries enjoying visa-free access to only 32 destinations around the world.

Read: Pakistani passport third worst for international travel

The report further revealed that the world's most powerful passports were now issued in the UK and Germany, with Finland, Sweden and the US all dropping to second place.

Compiled with excerpts from Arabian Business

COMMENTS (46)

Rahul | 9 years ago | Reply If in 2014 Pakistani citizens could travel to 32 countries and in two 2015 it could travel to only 31 countries then which country has revoked it VOA facility to Pakistan?
khalid | 9 years ago | Reply There ara huge number of pakistanis living abroad using afghan passports...specialy from kpk pakistan...
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ