Iran freeing al Qaeda men to fight in Af-Pak: Report

The Times report says Iranian authorities are giving covert support to militants as they fight against Nato troops.

Afp December 24, 2010

LONDON: Iran has released a string of top al Qaeda militants from detention so they can rebuild the terrorist organisation on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, The Times reported Friday.

Citing Pakistani and Middle Eastern officials speaking anonymously, The Times said Iranian authorities were giving covert support to the militants as they fight against Nato troops.

"In many cases they are being facilitated by Iranian Revolutionary Guards," The Times quoted a senior Pakistani intelligence official as saying.

The Times said those released include Saif al Adel, a high-ranking Egyptian al Qaeda member on the FBI's most wanted list for alleged involvement in the deadly 1998 bombings of US embassiess in East Africa. They also include Suleiman Abu Ghaith, a Kuwaiti accused of being al Qaeda's official spokesman at the time of the Septmeber 11, 2001 attacks, and Abu Khayr al Masri, a key aide to al Qaeda deputy leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri.

Three members of the family of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden were also among those freed, the officials were quoted by the Times as saying. Several top al Qaeda leaders fled to Iran when the US invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 and Iran is suspected of keeping them under house arrest as a strategic asset against the United States.

The Times quoted Pakistani officials as saying that Al-Adel had been named al Qaeda's chief of operations for Afghanistan and Pakistan. In July, Bin Laden's son Omar said that 20 members of the al Qaeda chief's family were stranded in Iran as Tehran was refusing to discuss their fate with Saudi Arabia. However a Kuwaiti newspaper reported in November that a number of leading al Qaeda members, including Abu Ghaith, had moved from Iran to Yemen.


Faisal | 11 years ago | Reply Muslim brotherhood??
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read