The withholding tax saga
It seems that as long as you have links with the right people in the right places, you can get away with anything
A man cycles past a closed market in Rawalpindi as traders observed a strike against government's decision to impose withholding tax. PHOTO: INP
The government offered an amnesty scheme to traders after they had announced a shutter-down strike for August 1, moving a step forward in negotiations over the saga of the withholding tax imposed on banking transactions, that had reached a standstill. The amnesty scheme would entail no scrutiny of the traders’ income tax return forms for the next three years. However, in return, traders would have to pay 25 per cent additional income tax annually for the specified time — in an attempt to compensate for the ‘no scrutiny’ guarantee the government is offering. The offer, which was rejected by traders when it was announced, also means that the withholding tax on all banking transactions valued over Rs50,000 and conducted by non-filers would stay as it is till August 31.
Even mere indications of there being a deal in the offing between the government and traders raise suspicions regarding the former’s intentions of widening the tax net. Why would the government need to negotiate when it is trying to broaden the tax net and why would it look to accommodate those who do not file income tax returns? Is the entire exercise being undertaken just to show the IMF that steps are being taken in reforming the tax structure, which would mean a green signal for the next loan tranche of the bailout programme? Are negotiations being carried out with an aim to appease those political forces which have put their weight behind the traders in a bid to shore up their chances at the next elections? The traders have proved to be a thorn in the government’s resolve to reduce tax evasion. They went on the warpath after the withholding tax levy was announced in the budget and seem to be getting away with filing their tax returns without scrutiny. This means they can declare assets to their liking and under-invoice as much as they want. It seems that in Pakistan, as long as you have links with the right people in the right places at the right time, you can get away with anything. The traders might have managed to do just that.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 2nd, 2015.
Even mere indications of there being a deal in the offing between the government and traders raise suspicions regarding the former’s intentions of widening the tax net. Why would the government need to negotiate when it is trying to broaden the tax net and why would it look to accommodate those who do not file income tax returns? Is the entire exercise being undertaken just to show the IMF that steps are being taken in reforming the tax structure, which would mean a green signal for the next loan tranche of the bailout programme? Are negotiations being carried out with an aim to appease those political forces which have put their weight behind the traders in a bid to shore up their chances at the next elections? The traders have proved to be a thorn in the government’s resolve to reduce tax evasion. They went on the warpath after the withholding tax levy was announced in the budget and seem to be getting away with filing their tax returns without scrutiny. This means they can declare assets to their liking and under-invoice as much as they want. It seems that in Pakistan, as long as you have links with the right people in the right places at the right time, you can get away with anything. The traders might have managed to do just that.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 2nd, 2015.