

The way the country’s blasphemy laws have been used has long been a cause for concern among civil rights bodies both national and international, and it is reported that some European countries have pressed for changes to the law. Currently, there are 14 people condemned to death for blasphemy and another 19 serving life sentences. The notorious case of Aasia Bibi, a woman found guilty of blasphemy after an altercation between women in a village, continues to raise deep concerns, and the burning to death of a Christian couple falsely accused of desecrating the Holy Quran caused outrage, both at home and abroad. The crux to the adjustments in the law makes it necessary to establish mens rea (bad intention) behind an act to establish that a crime has been committed. There have been cases where the blasphemy laws have been invoked that involved property disputes, personal enmities and religious or sectarian animosity. Bringing mens rea within the ambit of Section 295-C of the Constitution will hopefully allow for the pursuit of malicious or frivolous allegations, and the prosecution of those making them. We welcome these developments, and hope that they presage a wider review of the way blasphemy laws have been misused over the years.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 28th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ