Sikh repression

Today, Washington DC is hosting the next phase of the Khalistan Referendum being organised by Sikhs for Justice. Thousands are expected to participate, sending a message that New Delhi's efforts to silence the diaspora have failed. For the global Sikh community, the ballot remains the answer to Indian aggression.

No UN member state has criminalised these exercises as it is protected under Article 1 of the UN Charter. Democracies too have defended them as legitimate political expression, rejecting India's efforts to brand them as terrorism. New Delhi's response has been increasingly heavy-handed. In June 2023, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared "credible links" of Indian involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Soon after, activist Avtar Singh Khanda died under suspicious circumstances in the UK. In the US, prosecutors charged RAW operatives in a foiled plot to assassinate Gurpatwant Singh Pannun. Similar networks were uncovered in other countries, where Indian operatives spied on and intimidated Sikh activists.

India has also pressed for extraditions of referendum leaders, but Western courts have rejected these attempts, citing insufficient evidence and political motivation. Efforts to block referendum content on digital platforms have equally failed, with Google, YouTube and X refusing Indian demands. Instead, the diaspora has leveraged these spaces to mobilise voters. Meanwhile, the opening of a Sikh embassy in Canada has provided the movement with new diplomatic momentum. Driven by a global community of over 25 million, the Khalistan cause has grown into a broad-based diaspora campaign. Many activists now argue that India's tactics mirror colonial patterns of control over minorities, while its branding of dissent as terrorism reflects a slide towards authoritarianism.

By resorting to covert operations and censorship, India risks further isolation. Democracies that once sought closer ties with New Delhi now find themselves compelled to expose its activities and protect political freedoms on their soil.