Plan ready: PTA to verify SIMs of Afghan refugees

About 0.2 million blocked or unverified SIMs are being verified on daily bases


Ppi April 27, 2015
About 0.2 million blocked or unverified SIMs are being verified on daily bases. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:


After the biometric verifications of SIMs, the government is planning to authenticate local SIMs used by Afghan refugees.


“SIMs of people of Afghan origin having refugee cards will be verified,” Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) Chairman Ismail Shah told a seminar. The SIMs used by Afghan refugees will be brought under biometric system on the cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Shah said in a statement. The biometric verification process of SIMs of about 1.2 million Afghan refugees may be initiated soon, the PTA chairman said.


He said by 2025, there will be need of about two billion SIMs of all mobile operators and the government is properly planning for it.


He said that after biometric verification the total number of active verified SIMs reached 108 million on April 12, however, about 0.2 million blocked or unverified SIMs were being verified on daily bases. In this way, he said the number of verified SIMs would rise with the increase in the verification process.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 27th, 2015. 

COMMENTS (3)

A Pakistani | 6 years ago | Reply @Indian Observer. Objection overruled as out of place and irrelevant. Only Pakistanis can object to it through their elected representatives. It is the Parliament that has instructed the government to ensure security of the people. Please learn to respect your neighbours by not interfering in their internal affairs.
tribal | 6 years ago | Reply @Indian Observer: Every working SIM in Pakistan is bio metrically verified. And yes, its all in the name of national security and anti-terrorism measures. Only an enemy would want it otherwise.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read