Meanwhile, Daniel Feldman, special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, was seen frequently interacting with the leadership of the two countries both in Washington and in the respective capitals. And General Raheel Sharif, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, paid a two-week long extended visit to the US last year in November where he met his counterpart, the Centcom chief, as well as top officials of the state and defence departments, including Secretary of State John Kerry. The following month, Washington hosted the 23rd US-Pakistan Defence Consultative Group meeting. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had met Kerry twice, once in New York in September and next in London early December 2014. He met him for a third time in Islamabad on January 12. President Barack Obama had a telephonic conference with Nawaz Sharif on November 22, 2014. And between September and December 2014, a number of visits were undertaken by the top civil and military leadership of Pakistan and Afghanistan to each other’s capitals that seem to have served to enhance and deepen mutual understanding of one another’s problems and the measure of mutual cooperation needed in the areas of politics, military and intelligence, to overcome them.
As a result of all these efforts on the part of Pakistan, the Coalition Support Fund facility, which had expired at the end of last year, was restored by the US Congress with the condition that Pakistan cannot receive more than a billion dollars in a year. The facility expires at the end of fiscal year 2015. Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorised for Pakistan during the year, $300 million “shall not be eligible for the waiver unless the US secretary of defence certifies to the congressional defence committee that Pakistan has undertaken military operations in North Waziristan that have contributed to significantly disrupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani network”. The secretary will also be required to certify that Pakistan has taken steps that have demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that the NWA does not return to being a safe haven for the Haqqani network.
The US has also promised to release $532 million of assistance some time later this year, but not from the assistance earmarked under the expired Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act, passed in 2009. This Act had required the US administration to certify that Pakistan was “cooperating with the United States in counter-terrorism efforts against the Haqqani network, the Quetta Shura Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, al Qaeda, and other domestic and foreign terrorist organisations”. No funds were released from this facility since 2013.
When unable to issue a certification, the administration uses a national interest waiver to provide assistance. So for the release of the new assistance of $532 million, the US will use a national interest waiver. Such a waiver implies that it is in the US national interest to provide financial assistance to a country, which may not meet all the requirements for receiving US assistance. And in September last, the US also agreed to sell 160 mine resistance ambush protected vehicles, essential for the NWA military campaign, to Pakistan at a total cost of $198 million. Implementation of the proposed sale will require approximately two US government and 24 contractors’ representatives in Pakistan for 18 months to perform inspection and de-processing of vehicles upon delivery.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 14th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Sexton Blake:
"@observer: Dear observer, Good comment. Obviously at 80 years of age I still have something to learn."
We have seen this movie of turning a new leaf before. Didn't Musharraf tell the world after 9/11 that Pakistan had changed its Afghan policy and was in full cooperation with the war on terror? We all know the double-games he played keeping the "good" Taliban healthy and alive and even hiding top terrorists such as Osama bin Laden right next to his army compound in Pakistan.
The moral is: a leopard will never change its spots.
@ Observer
Afghans know Pakistan will be up to its old tricks sooner or later, they are not fooled by this so called paradigm shift. Ashraf Ghani and some Afghans are giving Pakistan the benefit of the doubt, albeit very cautiously.
Afghanistan is not the country it was in the 80s, 90s and noughties where a jihadi mindset was manufactured, which was exploited and manipulated by Pakistan at the expense of Afghans and Afghanistan.
The new generation of Afghan leaders are educated worldly technocrats that know how to negotiate and maneuver their way regionally and globally. Ashraf Ghani is probably the most educated head of state in South and Central Asia and he leads from the front. Let's hope that Pakistan and Afghanistan sincerely cooperate in ridding themselves of the menace of terrorism and bury the hatchet for the benefit of their people and the wider region.
@observer: Dear observer, Good comment. Obviously at 80 years of age I still have something to learn.
@Sexton Blake:
"So far nobody is making an educated guess as to why the change in policy."
The "change" in the Afghan policy is a mirage. It is a subterfuge to extract a few more billions of dollars from the US and other donor suckers by pretending to show them that Pakistan had turned a new leaf on its Afghan policy. Once the coast is clear, the age-old great Afghanistan strategic depth policy will be pushed into full gear.
So far nobody is making an educated guess as to why the change in policy. Obviously, leadership is failing. I will not go into revelation end times (apocalypse theory). However, perhaps we really need leadership at a world level if only we could find the right person or persons? Unfortunately, Britain tried it and failed, the US have tried it and failed miserably, the EU are tinkering with it but are a disaster, the UN is not worth a mention. I wonder who else will try it and what the future holds? A rough appraisal indicates the future does not look good.
Nothing to be proud of...
A rentier state... and the ruling cliques benefit...
The question is who has shifted in foreign policy. The readers can arrive at their own conclusion.
No opinion or conclusion found in the article. Just a plain sheet of facts ! Drab !
It is simple. US gives money, Pakistan is happy. US stops funding Pakistan, US is anti Pakistan. Never has Pakistan thought of funding its development plans or helping IDPs or helping its flood victims. So it is always about money. US is doing disservice to Pakistan by providing easy funds. Pakistan does not try to widen the tax net or generate income that is sufficient for her needs. It is like a drug addict, keep hoping to get US funds for it needs. What happened to Shahbaz Sharief's pronouncements that he will stop all aid from US.