The long haul

The visit of Mr Kerry is positive in its albeit small outcomes


Editorial January 13, 2015
US Secretary of State John Kerry and Advisor to the PM on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz addressing a joint press conference at Foreign Office in Islamabad on Tuesday. PHOTO: PID

There was a sense of all the participants having been there, in the same position, at the press conference that concluded the visit of US Secretary of State John Kerry — many times before. Mr Kerry certainly has, and so it was as well for his predecessor Mrs Clinton along with Messrs Rice, Powell and Albright. The sentiments expressed by Mr Kerry and by Sartaj Aziz, who is adviser to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on national security and foreign affairs, were familiar restatements of long-held positions. In short, little or nothing has changed and India and Pakistan continue to gnaw at each other much as they have for decades. The India-Pakistan relationship has never recovered from the shock of the attacks on Mumbai, and the trust deficit has never in reality been narrowed despite the best efforts of Mr Kerry and his predecessors, as well it must be said the present government in Pakistan, that really does appear to be prepared to go if not the extra mile, then make a step in the right direction.



Mr Aziz, at the press conference, asked that the US as an “influential member of the international community” use its good offices to work with Pakistan. The US has consistently refused to be drawn into such a role, at least on the surface though there will have doubtless been closed-door discussions on the subject, and Mr Kerry is most unlikely to respond in the affirmative. Any American support in resolving our differences is going to be dependent on both countries doing their own legwork first, only then will America “do whatever it can to try to help in that effort”. Message received, Mr Kerry.

Acknowledging that this was “the hardest time to work”, Mr Kerry credited Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for reaching out to our neighbours in the search for peace and understanding; doubtless a reference to the much-improved relations between the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan since the departure of the unlamented Hamid Karzai. This is a period of rapid regional change. The US is pivoting Pacific-wards and will have left the Afghan debacle behind it in a couple of years’ time, but wants India to continue its support for Afghanistan — a support that runs counter to the interests of Pakistan across a number of fronts. Mr Kerry and Mr Aziz both agreed that a peaceful and stable Afghanistan was in the best interests of the region as a whole, and that there was a linkage between the stability or otherwise of both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Whilst there was nothing that was new revealed by the press conference, the visit of Mr Kerry, and the general warmth of the mood-music that has accompanied it does underscore the easing of tensions between Pakistan and the US. There is going to be an increase in intelligence and security cooperation, and the strategic dialogue looks set to continue. A relaxing of tensions aside, Mr Kerry left Pakistan in no doubt as to American perceptions saying: “The tragedy of December 16 is really a reminder of the serious risk of allowing extremists to find space, and be able to command that space and operate within it.” The implication is obvious, and the time for ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban is now past.

It is for Pakistan to fight terrorism and extremism in all its guises and whatever flag it marches under, a fight that is going to mean some radical rethinking of long-held paradigms in our security establishment. Viewed overall, the visit of Mr Kerry is positive in its albeit small outcomes. The regional churn is going to continue for years to come, and much turns on the capacity for change in India and Pakistan. Presently, Pakistan has the initiative in the peace-race and India is still adjusting to the modalities of a nationalist government that is still ‘settling in’. Mr Kerry will be back because Uncle Sam has unfinished business. overnight.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 14th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (7)

Tore | 9 years ago | Reply

@woody:

Since partition the tilt has been in Indias favour and the reason is religion.

Turkey is an alley, because Europe has always been afraid of the mighty Russian army, therefore its reassuring for European to have a large country with 90 million inhabitants as an ally. Why do you thing they are not letting Turkey in European Union and Scenhgen, but in NATO.

I am not agree with you on case of Serbia. As the war in balkan had raged for 8-9 years and muslims countries saw that western world had imposed one sided embargo in bosnians muslims, and due to that they had to suffer alot, muslims countries in 1990's from 30-40 countries had decided to send their army to Bosnina to protect Bosnian muslims. In addition to that jehadi from all over the muslim world were travelling to Bosnia to help.

USA and UK didnt like the idea that muslims countries from 30-40 countries were to send their army to European soil, maybe it reminded they about crusades. And were afraid of furter development of the situation if the army of 30-40 muslim countries settled in Europe. USA and UK saw that as security risk , therefore USA met representatives from these muslim countries and told them that USA would help bosnian muslims and they therefor would not need to send their army to the region.

If that is correct that USA's policy is not created om religion, then that is very good, but its to good to be true.

woody | 9 years ago | Reply

@Tore:

People who live in west knows that Pakistan can never be deer to West because of Islam. Because Pakistan is a muslim country and India is a non muslim country. The rest of the american policies towards India is based on this consept, but nobody in Pakistan understands this point

Maybe nobody understands your point because it doesn't make sense? . USA policy towards India or Pakistan has zero to do with religion. Turkey has always been a Muslim country but it's a close ally of the USA and a member of NATO -- hows that possible if the USA is against Muslims? USA went to war with Serbia for the sole reason of protecting Muslims. The vast majority of Muslim nations are formal allies of the USA. The list goes on and on.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ