The PDP fought the elections with a clear stand on preserving Kashmir’s special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution and withdrawal of an act, which gives exceptional powers to the Indian Army to carry out operations in the state. Both these demands are anathema to the BJP. It undertook one of the most strenuous election campaigns in the occupied state with a well-thought-out strategy and is now pointing out that it bagged the highest number of votes of 23 per cent, closely followed by the PDP with 22.7 per cent of the votes. The BJP’s election campaign was a closely supervised one headed by its President Amit Shah, known for his astuteness and organisational abilities. He had the assistance of the Sangh Parivar and the RSS, especially in the Hindu-dominated constituencies. He deployed all organisational resources to mobilise party workers and the electorate, especially in the Jammu region, which represents nearly 65 per cent of the Hindu population. His efforts bore results as the region registered an over 70 per cent turnout. Strenuous efforts were made to bring back the Kashmiri pandits in the valley as registered voters, who were forced to leave their homes with the outbreak of insurgency in 1989. A special package was announced offering them government jobs, along with the construction of residential apartments for them in Srinagar. Services of RSS workers were used for mobilisation and relocation of the pandits. As a result, over 100,000 voters were registered in the valley. It was clear that the BJP was treating this election as a make or break one, with the BJP president making his intention of having a Hindu chief minister for a predominantly Muslim state clear, as well as eyeing an absolute majority and the role of a dominant player in state politics for his party.
The strategy, however, suffered from an inherent flaw as it overlooked Kashmir’s complex political dynamics. While development had been the avowed plank on which the BJP contested, it was by and large subsumed by the wave of Hindutva, which an average Muslim voter in the valley could distinctly perceive. While the Hindutva mantra could work in other states like Jharkand and Maharashtra, it could not find much bearing in Kashmir. Despite the tall claims of polling the highest number of votes by the BJP, the composition of this tally offers an interesting analysis. The BJP, while sweeping in the Jammu region, could not secure a single seat in the Buddhist-dominated Ladakh region and also in the valley which is dominated by an over 90 per cent Muslim population. It could muster just two per cent of the total votes cast in the valley. It fielded 31 Muslim candidates throughout the state while only one could make it to the assembly. In its bid to get its Kashmir operation started, the BJP has further communalised the political divide in the state. While hectic efforts were afoot by various stakeholders to form the government, voices came up from the Jammu region for the state’s break-up into two separate states. This idea is not of recent origin, but the BJP’s politics fuelled by ultra-right elements has precipitated it. It had been latent and was in hibernation.
The Kashmir-centric PDP’s stance on Article 370 and on the act that gives special powers to the armed forces is in opposition to that of the BJP. The former wishes to see the process of political dialogue to be carried forward with alienated elements as well as with Pakistan. The BJP also realises that despite political posturing, doing away with the special status will not be a simple task. Despite the division in the votes of state-based regional parties, they are all firmly united on the non-negotiable status of Article 370.
The PDP, despite its avowed stand on the basic issues confronting the Kashmiri mind, may not be averse to a coalition arrangement with the BJP in the future. It may be an interesting experience for both if this ever happens. It may well help the PDP to cast a sobering influence on the BJP’s agenda, and help it understand the sensitivities of local politics.
While the present Indian government misses no opportunity in pointing finger towards Pakistan for anything that goes wrong in Kashmir, its current role has been far from desirable in keeping the Line of Control (LoC) boiling hot for so many months. In the latest bout of LoC violations, many Pakistani civilians and soldiers lost their lives. This is akin to tacitly helping the cause of the Taliban against whom the Pakistan Army is engaged on the western front. The BJP is certainly ignoring the bigger picture here.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 13th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@anwar shahid: Explain on what grounds/ principals India was divided. Indian didn't adopt double standards anywhere. Pakistan did, on one side creating homeland for subcontinent muslims and then signing liaquat nehru pact. You can go to UN and file case against India for Junagarh and Hyderabad. Pakistan's stamps did indeed showed both Kashmir and Junagarh as a disputed territory for many years, why did you stop doing that? Junagarh was handed over to India by the then CM of Junagarh. Pakistan has never filed a case.
Jinnah never demanded Kashmir. It was India who demanded plebiscite and its case is still in UN. How Pakistani live with the fact that majority Indian Muslim never moved to Pakistan? Pakistan got more that 25% of land for 15% of population. Why don't you give land back to India? Pakistani are the one who got huge resources per capita than rest of the people of subcontinent. It was not India but Pakistan who attacked Kashmir. Indian non-muslims are supposed to get 75% of land, when they will get their land?
Which history are you talking about when it is available for everyone to read on internet?
@vinsin: It will be easier for Indians to understand the Kashmir issue if they study history honestly and try to learn on what grounds/ principals India was divided and how the cunning politicians of India adopted double standards.They grabbed the states of Hyderabad and Junagarh on one hand while on the other tried to gulp Kashmir...but when they saw the valley going out of their hands they approached UN for a ceasefire promising a plebe cite on the issue.However when they gained the advantage of ceasefire they turned their back shamelessly..As a matter of fact .It is not Kashmir but this treacherous approach which is the problem...I wonder if the Indians have as yet gained the courage to face the facts...!
@Assad: What exactly do you want India to do? Sardar Patel offered Kashmir valley to Pakistan for east Pakistan but Pakistan refused. Also the decision is from UN ceasefire, both sides cannot do much.
Ginn.
If valley is a tiny strip of the size of an Indian district then why are you clinging! You have deployed over seven division Army for over two decades , what for . Do you expect some oil wealth worth exploring and oiling your war machine . Like West Bank is a thorn in the heart of Israel so is the valley as for India is concerned .
Kashmir rejects India--why ??? and that the Government-of India- mean there is a dare evil in-front of most of the Kashmirs. Because Already Kashmir divide to Pakistan & china-- And Pakistan sold Akasi-chin to china-, I mean to say that it is true that China is the sake holder of Kashmir -- Here - BJP-- is a very new infant child of here-- my respected friends-- see that old Kashmir political parties against BJP & union of India--why ? Pakistan & china is not interested BJP-CM post in J&K---,here one question raised so many time-- Why Smt.Indria not added POK--to india on that 1971-- Indo-pak war--because China is a stake holder of the kasmir
Move on. Another lame Kashmir related article. The so called Kashmir valley is a small insignificant strip of land of area 800 sq km, which is smaller than the size of a typical district of an Indian state. Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Shia Muslims, Ismailis, Gujjars form majority of the population. A normal Kashmiri wants peace and properity. Why would he risk his bright future for nations like Pakistan, ISIS Daesh, Talibun stans etc. The author doesn't get it.
@Naeem Khan: Ah here comes another person who believes in hearsay and no factual statistics. Stay strong in your false sense of victimhood.
"....In its bid to get its Kashmir operation started, the BJP has further communicated the political divide in the state. While hectic efforts were afoot by various stakeholders to form the government, voices came up from the Jammu region for the state’s break-up into two separate states. This idea is not of recent origin, but the BJP’s politics fuelled by ultra-right elements has precipitated it. It had been latent and was in hibernation "The author has wisely pointed out towards a latent idea which might emerge as a new dimension of the solution of the Kashmir issue which remains unresolved because of the short sighted approach of Indian leadership lacking magnanimity.......It sounds something like emergence of another Pakistan within Kashmir not much to the liking of the Indians..
For Kashmir, we want nothing except peace. Interestingly, Modi government sets itself on those channels which relate to the Western neighborhood. The problem is the hostility and aggression which this governmental party symbolizes since its very initials. It is a known fact that BJP is more inclined towards aggression and its war inclination instinct is an open but silent truth.
author deliberately forgot to mention losses of lives of indian soldiers and civilians by pakistan shelling and firing
Ban Ki Mon Guiding India to be a peaceful nation must also advise them to honour the people of Kashmiri and settle it down peacefully. Kashmir is an international issue and is recognized as such by the United Nations. The United States needs to recognize this and act accordingly. Not only will an initiative along these lines establish its credibility in the Third World, but it will also strengthen the United Nations."Ultimately, these strategies will not work if India refuses to accord priority to improving relations with Pakistan". This sums up the entire article.
Indian readers have a condescending attitude about Pakistani op ed commenting on India ; that they lack some basic understanding and need to see events as how the Indians see the events .This one upmanship is denying the stalk ground reality . The author has placed the facts now for the readers to see that BJP's antics and strategy has deeply communalised the Indian politics and some MPs from Jammu are now publicly airing the view of division of the state which by default , if happens , will again be on communal lines . Ajit Shah is on record expressing his wish to see a Hindu Chief Minister of the state . The Governors rule will certainly facilitate his task .Abolition of Article 370 in the name of investment is bunkum. No Kashmiri will wish to stop that's such investment nor there is hurdle to that . The commentator needs to glean through the Indian constitution . All it is required is to route such grandiose plans through the state legislature . The intent to revoke Article 370 ,is different more in line with the ideals of Hindutva .,and that is to change the demography of the state . Well the people of Kashmir , especially from the valley had been and will resist such moves. to the hilt . It has a history of defiance and that goes back to 1930s.
@Rahul: Well said rahul..your views are spot on.atleast now many pakistanis will understand and stop spreading lies on kashmir..
Author: The imposition of governor rule by the centre signifies that the central government of the BJP will now have far greater leverage to dictate terms and extract a favourable outcome despite the party lacking a clear majority in the state.
What do you expect Delhi to do, after care taker chief minister Omar resigned?
So we are back to business. Finding reasons arguments and excuses to put forth the view that Kashmir rejects India and that the Government there is evil. This must provide a lot of succour to the troubled souls. Should one not wake up? Recognize that a fair free elestion was held? That people of Jammu and Kashmir defied the diktats of the separatists? That one side's obsession need not be another side's concern at all? That wishful thinking is not a substitute to reality? That people on the other side of Kashmir are not necessarily worse off? How long can one be India-centric?
The Indian Trolls are having hay day. The fact still remains that Kashmir is not integral part of India but a disputed area which is recognized the world over in the United Nation. Commitments were made by the Indian Prime Minister in the United Nation to have free plebiscite in the region and let the inhabitants of Kashmir decide their own future. BJP could never change the outcome because people just don't like to be subjugated for years and years. My question to these Troll is why are you guys so afraid to have international free press to go there and report their findings to the world. Let the people tell them about the atrocities which has been committed by the Indian security forces mainly the Army in the last ten years, it has been reported by the people there that more than 100,000 Kashmiris has been killed and hundreds of their women folks raped by the Indian Army. Personally I would like to see a free plebiscite in both sides of Kashmir and let the people of this unfortunate area decide their own fate, they may decide not to be part of India or Pakistan but a free democratic State in the world community. But that so called democratic India will not allow that to happen.
Article 370 is an anchronism. Why should a state of India have a separate status. kashmir depends on Indian government for financial and security support so why should it have a separate status. Would Pakistan Government allow KP Provinc to have a separate status? I do not think so then why should Indian government? Furthermore Pakistan should stop concerned with kashmir and India and manage its affairs to provide its citizens security sorely needed.
Politics is not about religion but about ideas. Governor's rule doesn't mean bjp rule but congress rule as the current president is from congress not bjp. Bjp will play a significant role in deciding next president maybe then bjp can have more control over j&k. Article 370 just create Pakistan inside India which never made any sense. Indian president always had the right to remove the article 370 any time he wants. Pakistan abolish its special status to kashmiri long time back and many Pakistani have married kashmiri but expect India not to do the same.
The analysis that PDP Vs BJP vote split was on the basis of religious bias is wrong. One cannot expect any further thinking from PAK perspective. However, the counter discussion that the vote split was on the issue of article 370 is correct and it speaks for itself that political issue is on important constitutional matter affecting J&K and not the religious bigotry.
Article 370 has been an impediment for outside private investments into J&K. It was a political protective measure that out lived its role. Given the dynamics of changing economic and political landscape, the article 370 issue is well understood by J&K ruling elites and the past CM had indicated as such on various occasions. It will be circumvented through legislative process in J&K, since constitutional amendment is a procrastinated process(PAK is an exception).
Coalition of PDP and BJP is a given scenario once the power brokers agree on the ego. All other religious analysis is nonsensical except for ego satisfaction. Why can't PAK analysis think that the local voters elected their local candidates that they are comfortable with at this juncture. After all voters change their allegiance in every election cycle in every country.
The voter turnout itself speaks volume that the policies of GoI in J&K have been working very well.
Loc is kept hot only by one side? The author will do well to open his mind up a little to other possibilities as all journalists should do.
This article lacks an understanding of the Indian political system. BJP represents right wing Hindus. PDP represents right wing Muslims. Jammu is a Hindu majority area where BJP handily won. Kashmir is a Muslim majority area where PDP handily won. If the ruling party loses (NC in this case), the government continues as caretaker until a new government can be installed. The Election Commission carefully monitors what politicians can promise and say at the time of elections and can reprimand them if it chooses. PDP believes Army should be withdrawn from day-to-day law and order responsibilities in Kashmir, BJP does not believe the Police is up to the challenge yet. BJP wants article 370 withdrawn, PDP does not agree. BJP thinks J&K should have a Hindu chief minister since it has always had a Muslim chief minister, PDP wants Mufti to be chief minister. Since the 2 parties could not come to an understanding, governors rule has been imposed. The parties can go on negotiating for even up to 6 months. If there is still no agreement on a government, the governor can recommend fresh elections. Everything that happens in the world is not necessarily a conspiracy against Muslims/Islam/Pakistan.
Clearly the author has not heard a single speech that Modi made in J&K,. If Hindutva was such a powerful rallying cause, how is it that the BJP never won this many seats before - two elections back they had only two seats in J&K, while Jammu had the same number of Hindus. Pakistanis need to stop looking at India through glasses colored by religion, and they will see it is much more complex and dynamic than they imagine.