All these measures are important and noteworthy. The ongoing Operation Zarb-e-Azb is here to stay and perhaps, is likely to be extended to other areas. But the central question is, whether these tactical moves are sufficient to tackle the hydra-headed Frankenstein’s monsters that Pakistan’s flawed national security policy has created, sustained and nurtured, sometimes with outside support and on occasions totally on its own. There is a name for this Frankenstein’s monster and it is known as jihad — a narrow, self-seeking interpretation of an otherwise lofty and ethereal religious concept. The struggle embedded in jihad — according to most scholars and not semi-literate clerics — is self-improvement. Instead, this has turned into a spectator sport where private militias carry out state objectives in the region and within the land of the pure.
This trajectory is an old one. It did not happen overnight nor was it a ploy of the Unites States and other powers to get Pakistan into a royal mess. In 1948, ‘jihadis’ from the tribal regions started with the battle of Kashmir that continues to date. Conventional wars or private ‘jihad’ efforts have brought neither glory to Pakistan nor relief for the Kashmiris, most of whom are sick of India and Pakistan treating their land and rights as national fiefs.
The trend set in 1948 continued under various forms and guises until the Afghan war of the 1980s and the ascension of a conservative general allowed for re-engineering of the state and society. Some of us grew up in that decade and witnessed first-hand how the idea of militia-led (with state sponsorship) “jihad” turned into national pride, an educational instrument and a central tenet of popular discourse. Pick up a newspaper column, a defence or security review and the central idea is that Pakistan had defeated a world power, i.e., the Soviet Union through jihad. This delusional victory has completely ignored the plight of Afghans inside and outside Pakistan, the famed heroin and Kalashnikov culture and private militias that have to be kept busy lest they consume their creator.
Concurrently, the rise of sectarian militias in Punjab and elsewhere bolstered the ‘jihad’ industry in the 1980s. Researchers have noted that the then-military regime allowed for these militias to rise and strengthen as community networks. Today, they are the veritable core of ‘jihadi’ infrastructure from Bahawalpur to Lahore and from Karachi to Quetta.
It does not matter which group or sub-group adheres to what, spares whom and kills whom: they all preach, practise and breed violence in the name of religion and sects. There was an opportunity in the 1990s under the quasi civilian regimes to do something, but they also caved in either to survive in power (the late Benazir Bhutto) or under plain fear of being attacked (the Sharif brothers).
The global war on terror complicated matters further. In view of the US invasion of neighbouring Afghanistan, Pakistan’s establishment viewed this infrastructure as an asset and when General (retd) Pervez Musharraf tried to take half-hearted measures, he also faced assassination attempts. This was also the decade when domestic ‘jihad’ networks acquired global linkages through al Qaeda and now as some reports suggest, the Islamic State is inspiring them for global action.
This is not to say that Pakistan’s military establishment is not cognisant of this reality. But former army chief General (retd) Ashfaq Parvez Kayani was averse to proceed against militants for a variety of reasons. His successor has proved to be tougher and more clear-headed. And Operation Zarb-e-Azb comes as a much-needed action by the state. How far would this go is another matter and whether it would also clean up the allied sectarian networks remains to be seen.
Has Peshawar changed things? Yes, it has galvanised public opinion and there are heroic civil society movements unfolding. There seems to be greater clarity in identifying the enemy within. At the same time, at least three major voices on mainstream electronic media are raising the India bogey and claiming that India may have orchestrated this. There can be nothing more tragic than obfuscating this moment of clarity. While the spirited crowd outside the Lal Masjid demanding action against hate and violence preaching clerics is commendable, there were huge numbers at the funerals of two terrorists recently hanged. What does that signify? In part, it demonstrates that ‘jihad’ as a concept has seeped into the national mind.
Young children read the merits of this ‘jihad’ from textbooks. Heroism in Kashmir and Afghanistan is narrated on television and through the massive ‘jihadi’ publication industry. For those who don’t read or watch TV, mosque sermons are filled with prayers to decimate infidels and interpreting the national raison d’etre as ‘jihad’ against those who want to undo Pakistan and religion. This conflation is what is at the heart of the matter.
For Pakistan to emerge out of this quagmire, its leadership — parliament and the military — will have to change the direction of the country. Other than the short- to medium-term militaristic, administrative and capacity issues, there is a larger battle to be won. And that is about redefining Pakistan. Until then, Gojras, Meena Bazaars and Data Darbars will be bombed and children in Peshawar and elsewhere will remain vulnerable to ideologies of violence.
It is highly unlikely that the quality of leadership has the intellectual or the historical vision to reverse the tide. We have gone too far and this requires a decades-long struggle to reset the country’s direction. Therefore, all those expecting miracles to happen, that time has not come.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 24th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Liked the way you ended it.........pretty spot on.
Dear Sir,
Time has come for take bull by horns. We will need out of box solutions. I would suggest following steps -Let us acknowledge that real power center in the Pakistan is General Rahil Sharif. Let Pakistan select a team under general Sharif which include senior officers of defence forces and leaders of all major political parties. Similarly teams of Indian & Afghan defence forces and political leadership selected. It is in self interest of Pakistan to take lead. -Let us understand that not a single country can solve the the problem on its own. - Let them meet in Geneva or oslo. - Let each side present red lines which are not acceptable to other and brainstorm the points. The first condition is to freeze the all current problems for future except only problem of terrorism. - let them think with the open mind. I am sure a common minimum programme can be arrived for all to follow. This includes short term as well as long term solutions. - the dialogue should be carried out completely in absence of media glare. - Let us select a team of same people to review the steps taken by each country at every qurter. - All three countries are victims of major terrorism attacks and had paid the development cost of around 25 years.
@SalmanNaseer: I consider Raza Rumi as a balanced commentator. There is nothing objectionable in this piece. But there are libralsl/seculars who clearly espouse such agenda. For example one of his close pal in US is advocating that Pakistan should give Mulla Omar to Afghanistan/US. Such type of liberals nurse obvious antipathy against anything religious. They would be satisfied only when we renounce our nuclear status and openly adopt western values. They can have their dreams but the state policies cannot be made on their wishes.All the seculars have a narrative which clearly states that religion should have no business with the state.The difference is that some have the courage to say it openly.
@Cosmo: First part didn't get publish. That is history and has nothing to do with any senses.
Lets look into History, India is also responsible and the answer should come from Indian government and Indians.
After 1946 election (didn't happen in J&K), Muslim League secured 86.6% of Muslims vote on the basis of creation of Pakistan. Jinnah discussed boundary with Muslims League and Mountbatten and demanded Sindh, Punjan and Bengal (no Kashmir as that time Kashmir was seen as a liability bith in terms of security and as a non-habitable region). It was expected that at least 80-90% of Indian Muslim will move to Pakistan after its creation. Jinnah didn't respond when Mountbatten asked for Pakistan as Jinnah knew he can ask for a Pakistan but not sure whether congress will allow Indian Muslims to move to Pakistan. As history shows Jinnah was right and, Nehru and Congress start working immediately after Pakistan creation and stopped Indian Muslims to move to Pakistan. Many poor muslims were also not helped to move to Pakistan. It is very difficult to define Pakistan as only as less as 28% of Indian Muslims move to Pakistan. But who is responsible, Indian Muslims who voted, fought for and created Pakistan but never moved or Nehru and Congress who supported TNT and then start opposing it. Why Nehru became suddenly anti Pakistan just after it's creation? The final nail in the coffin is Liaquat Nehru Pact which itself is contradictory to Partition Act and TNT. India has also never tried to define Muslims in a non-muslims state. Congress doesn't care and BJP wants Hindutva. No Party claims India should be made secular.
@vinsin: Wha da duck was all that. Made no sense to me!!
@ Shabir Ahmad. It is the first time that I am reading an analysis by Mr. Rumi. I thoroughly liked it. There is little I can disagree to. Although I have known his reputation as a commentator with liberal/secular leanings, I am afraid there is nothing in this particular piece that argues for relegating religion in its entirety to a role that our society may not be prepared for. What he does posit, however, is that the narrow, jihad-based narrative must be rewritten. Please rest assured that we can reorient ourselves towards aspects of religion that stress, for instance, civic good -- and still maintain our piety.
Viren Naik You give too much credit to the generals. It is the responsibility of the politicians and the civilian government to formulate domestic and foreigner policies. It is them who should decide how the scourge of terrorism will be managed. The direction taken by the general is beyond criticism and protest. We need a political solution supported by force where needed. The generals are not equipped to do politics. The politician may appear to be incapable of dealing with serious situations but they are the only answer.
The Peshawar tragedy has indeed changed the public opinion against militancy. There are people like Raza Rumi who want to use this occasion to further their agenda of making Pakistan a liberal and secular country. There is nothing wrong with their strategy because they have a right to pursue their ideology. But to expect and ask the permanent establishment to radically change their policies to the satisfaction of the liberals is not only unrealistic but against the ground realities of the country. We may like it or not but Pakistan is country having deep religious roots and an overwhelming majority follow Islam and are proponents of its role in state affairs. How much that role should be is s matter is debate but history has shown that majority are against religious extremism. Moreover we are also witness to the repeated failures of the liberal leadership and their expediencies. So the realistic goal should be the eradication of extremism in the context of Pakistan's ground realities rather than creating an imaginary liberal and secular dispensation.
When Indian Muslims didn't move saying that Pakistan is small, Jinnah was shocked as Pakistan got 25% of Land for Indian Muslims as per population and Nehru refused to either help or force them to Pakistan, seed the enmity between both the leaders. By that time India has also failed to get all the states by 15th August, notably Junagardh, Bhopal, Hyderabad and Kashmir. Princely states bordering like Chitral etc were also waiting for the final decision of Jammu and Kashmir. Jihad was declared in Kashmir, in-spite of standstill agreement. It is hard to say whether Jinnah decision was permanent or temporary or merely to attract more Indian Muslims. From a Pakistan point of view having a Muslims majority area with India goes against the idea of Pakistan. Nehru and Congress were not ready to resolve Pakistan dilemma. Instead of blaming Indian Muslims they started blaming Pakistan Muslims. Kashmir Jihad was opposed by both East Pakistan and Maududi as for both of them Pakistan should forget about those Indian Muslims who didn't move. Pakistani people and military took the Jihad in the wrong way that Pakistan was created to destroy India or take Kashmir, rather than as a welfare state. Since India created Pakistan it should also define it. It is not in the benefit for Indian Muslims for India to have a good relation with Pakistan. India Muslims should sacrifice for Pakistan and stability of this reason.
The world has shown amazing patience in dealing with Pakistan, despite all the evidence linking sections of the government to the major terror events in South Asia and beyond. Whatever justification Pakistan may have for its wayward behavior, it will be fatal to underestimate the current repulsion for use of violence to achieve territorial or religious goals. Today global appetite for violence and conquest is very low, more so the ideologically motivated type. If Pakistan is unable to see this shift, it will be at its own peril. For years Pakistan has claimed that its tolerance for all brands of terrorists is zero, in direct contrast to its actions of providing shelter to many of them from neighboring countries. In this day and age of Communications and Technology, one can only fool oneself, not the world. Time for change, not of the cosmetic kind though.
I agree that Pakistan needs to establish its own narrative instead by the extremists. The nation as a whole should do a self analysis based on realities and sets an agenda that is secular in nature and Pakistan first. The partition vestige is holding us back and the extremists are taking advantage of us. We can stop this madness and build a new nation compatible with the founder's dream.
Plain and simple ... !! ... there is a magic wand ... !! ... living in denial will only lead to more of the same in the years to come ... !!
http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Policy-Politics/The-Gulf-Arab-foundations-of-terror-in-Pakistan
These terrorists will go to heaven by killing innocent children ,whereas the rulers of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif and Shabaz Sharif will go to heaven in metros and motorways . http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Policy-Politics/The-Gulf-Arab-foundations-of-terror-in-Pakistan
A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step. There cannot be a magic bullet to solve 70 years of rot, but at this point I will settle for any signs of a course correction!
Raza, I have this to say. There was a meaning behind General Raheel's visit to USA recently. The USA when they have a major shift to make in its Foreign Policy they start making preparations long time before they act upon these changes. Obama is coming to India as the chief guest on the Republic day and this is not a pleasure trip. The two nations are coming together and a lot of attention is given to various agreements relating to Trade and Defence. The US investors will not wholeheartedly come to India when there is Terror exported from its own client nation therefore a scenario of safety has to be created. Naren and Barack and their respective governments now firmly believe that this is definitely the win-win situation for the world at large. A lot of things are happening in the background. You must have seen that not a single Pakistani Government politician has uttered a word in anger towards India after Peshawar. This Pakistani Army General is a new batch commander promoted long after the Arm Chair days of Mush & Co. This guy has seen the true reality and what damage it has done to the morale of the nationhood. Even Afghanistan is cooperating and Modi has strongly shut up his politicians as well. The latest Kashmir Election has nothing to do with this. Pakistani Army leadership is finally convinced now that good times can be achieved for both the nations if Economic development is given a chance.. I won't say anything more because dangers are lurking everywhere and there are forces on both the sides who do not want to give peace a chance at any cost. The day it dawns in the minds of the common people of the Subcontinent that come whatever we will together fight these terror outfits and their protectors the long golden period of the dawn of age of Aquarius will begin. It is a long process may be not in my life time but will be done mark my words. Regards and God Bless Viren Naik