PM disqualification: Short on time, SC adjourns hearing to Thursday

In a short hearing, the bench says petitioners can approach chief justice for formation of larger bench


Hasnaat Malik September 29, 2014

ISLAMABAD: After a brief hearing, the plea to disqualify Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been adjourned by the Supreme Court (SC) to Thursday due to shortage of time.  

During the short session, the three-judge bench of the top court, headed by the SC’s senior most judge Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, on Monday observed that the petitioners may file an application to the chief justice of Pakistan regarding the constitution of a larger bench in this case.

Three petitioners are seeking the premier's disqualification under Article 62 (f) of the Constitution -- contending that the prime minister had recently given a ‘false statement’ in the National Assembly regarding the involvement of the Army chief in negotiating with the leaders of protest camps currently set up in Islamabad.

The petitioners have contended that Nawaz was also involved in matters related to the attack on the Supreme Court, as well as going abroad for ten years after signing a pardon agreement with former president Pervez Musharraf, but denied making such an agreement.

Justice Mushir Alam and Justice Dost Muhammad Khan are the other members of the bench.

Justice Mushir Alam during the brief hearing on Monday asked counsels for the applicants to come prepared on Article 68, 69 and 95 of the Constitution along with their implications on the next date of the hearing.

It is to be noted that Article 69 says that Parliament’s proceedings cannot be in question in any court of law.

The petitions, filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) chief Chaudhry Shujat Hussain, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Ishaq Khan Khakwani and one lawyer Gohar Nawaz regarding the disqualification of the prime minister.

Earlier, the Lahore High Court (LHC) on September 8 rejected Gohar Nawaz’s plea on the same matter – which he has now challenged in the apex court.

On Monday, the SC observed that as one member of the bench is part of a larger bench being assembled at 1:00 pm, the case will be taken up on Thursday, October 2.

Gohar Nawaz, one of the applicants in this case, has requested the bench to constitute a larger bench for hearing the matter related to the disqualification of the prime minister. For this, Gohar has been asked to file an application.

Justice Jawwad S Khawaja told him that he may file an application to the CJP because it is his prerogative to form a larger bench in any matter.

He also asked the counsels for petitioners to get the transcript of the prime minister’s August 29 speech in question from the Parliament Secretariat in view of Article 19-A of the Constitution, rather than relying on print media reports.

Background

PTI and PML-Q had earlier moved a petition in the apex court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif under Article 62-F of the Constitution.

The PML-Q chief stated that Nawaz, himself, had demanded the resignation of former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani in the past.

Khakwani submitted the petition against Nawaz on September 2 through his counsel advocate, Irfan Qadir, citing his reason as the controversial statement made on the floor of the House regarding the role of army in the political crisis.

Monday was the first hearing of the case. On Friday, Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk had heard the PTI leader’s appeal against the registrar office’s objections in his chamber. Advocate Qadir appeared before the chief justice, and contended that the registrar has no power to decide whether the petition is maintainable or not.

After hearing the arguments, the CJ on Friday set aside the registrar office's objections and fixed the case for preliminary hearing.

COMMENTS (15)

Rizwan | 9 years ago | Reply It is humbly suggested that whole nation should approached the Supreme Court of Pakistan regarding the disqualification of False PM on giving the False statement in the National Assembly. It is most appropriate time to get red of this evil. Supreme Court should come out from doctrine of necessarily now and give clear verdict against mandate thieves.
H Chaudhry | 9 years ago | Reply

@Amanullah Khan You answered your question, "Time-pass Case". There is a sensitivity around topic so Court is entertaining but there is just no legal basis. Actually, just taking this case is opening up court to millions of false lawsuits, where one thinks other lied in Parliament. It will not go any where not because Court belongs to N but there is just not legal basis/

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ