Remove the white part of the national flag if you cannot give minorities justice, a Hindu resident of Gracey Lines said regretfully.
Named after the second Commander in Chief of the Pakistan Army General Douglas Gracey, the area is located in Block 4 of Chaklala Cantonment Board (CCB). Almost 50 families including Hindus, Christians, and Sikhs and Muslims reside the area, many of which have been here since the 1930s. Most of the people are daily wagers and live hand-to-mouth. The average daily income of the residents is between Rs7,000 and Rs9,000.
There is also a Hindu temple in the area called Maharishi Valmik Swamiji”, which was built in 1935.
The Pakistan Army is trying to confiscate land from the residents of Gracey Lines for the construction of a housing and education complex.
In December 2013, 70 kanals were allotted to the Frontier Works Organisation (FWO), an engineering branch of the army, for construction of FWO housing and Education Complex. Residents of the area have been issued with eviction notices, which also apply to the temple and a Hindu graveyard.
FWO have already started construction on the graveyard area. Incidentally, under the demarcation of the Rawalpindi Military Estate Office (MEO) in 1933, 4.2 kanals were allocated for the graveyard, only 1.5 kanals of which are available to the community. The rest has already been built over.
Residents of the area are worried by the situation but they were also afraid to share too many details because they have been asked by “some army officials” to stop sharing details with the media.
Nadim Sunil, a Hindu resident of the area, told The Express Tribune, “We had a choice at the time of partition whether to go India or to live in Pakistan. Our forefathers willingly decided to stay in Pakistan. “Their fears were erased by Quaid-e-Azam, who promised that the rights of minorities would be protected at any cost,” he said.
“We believe in the words of the Quaid,” he said, quoting Jinnah’s address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan on August 11, 1947, “You will find that in course of time, Hindus would cease to be Hindus, and Muslims would cease to be Muslims,” which was in explanation of an earlier statement, “We are starting in the days where there is no discrimination, no distinction between one community and another, no discrimination between one caste or creed and another. We are starting with this fundamental principle — that we are all citizens, and equal citizens, of one state.” But many in the area felt less than equal. “Did we commit some mistake that we were being treated in such a manner,” Sunil asked.
We have been offered Rs2 million by the military as compensation for the demolition of the temple, he said. “Would you accept any amount to allow the demolition of your only place of worship?,” he asked, his eyes beginning to well up. “We are ready to vacate our houses but we should be given space to live near the temple,” he said.
Deadline deal
He said that the eviction notification was issued on December 12, 2013, but they were only informed on August 5, 2014, less than two weeks before the deadline. “The army had our water connections cut and we are forced to drink unclean water now,” he said.
He then showed a copy of a renewable lease agreement under which the land was given to the community for 100 years. “After only 82 years they are asking us to vacate the land,” he said.
“We even shifted our funeral pyre to Attock so that it would not disturb Muslims living nearby. When we have never disturbed anyone, why are we being asked to vacate our houses,” he asked.
Victor John, another local resident, said Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims and Christians have been living here for the last 82 years without any ill-will towards each other. “It would be a cruel act to expel them from the locality,” he said.
“We are mistreated at every platform in this country despite the fact that we are equal Pakistanis,” he added.
Khurram Shehzad, a Christian who had converted from Hinduism, from the locality told The Express Tribune that they often felt that belonging to a minority group is a stigma.
“We are denied real work and are forced to do odd jobs,” he added. He said that they set up Sudhar Young Hindu Welfare Society (SYHWS) to challenge the decision in court, they could not afford the costs. That is when minorities MNA Isphanyar Bhandara, himself a Rawalpindi resident, stepped in to arrange a lawyer and cover the legal fees.
“The FWO has even constructed toilets over our graveyard,” he said.
He said they have written to every relevant military office and also the Punjab chief Minister, “but no one bothered to give us a response”.
Jagdesh Bhatti, patron-in-chief of SYHWS, told The Express Tribune that there are two temples within the same building and pointed to a picture of a Hindu god with the inscription “Saiva Karae Somraj Sohantra Akaash Raj Sohantra”, and said that we consider this place a separate temple because we had no other place available to construct a separate temple. He said that Army Public School (APS), next to the temple, stretches across 15 to 20 kanals while the temple is a mere 10 to 12 marlas. He hoped that the affected people would be allowed to resettle around the temple if their houses must be razed.
The office of the Inter Services Public Relations director general directed The Express Tribune to contact Colonel Shafique for comment on the issue, but the colonel did not respond to multiple phone calls.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 13th, 2014.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@vinsin: Wish people like Ambedkar and Patel had more say than Nehru at the time of independence.
@Sahil: You didn't get it. Indian Muslims will not move to Pakistan as their aim is to Islamize India. Pakistan will also not accept it as it has nothing to gain. Ambedkar asked for complete partition continuously for 10 yrs.
Perhaps it is a good idea to do one more population swap. Both India and Pakistan should open its doors to exchange citizens in equal numbers. This way minorities of India and Pakistan will have opportunity to make their choice and not suffer for the mistakes made by their forefathers at the time of partition. However this time the swap must be done in civilized manner with both the countries committing to peace and offering employment to the new citizens.
@Kancha Ilaiah: When did I said hindus are not better off? Prove it that I belong to RSS and what I said is RSS propaganda? You should also prove that why hindus went down from 22% to 1% in Paksitan. I am a minority from India.
@Kancha Ilaiah: Only a person like you can make this claim without reading the statistics over the decades to show the shirking space for minorities.
@LandOfImpurity: To add to what you have said, Have you seen at any time. the hindus or sikhs or christians being associated with any spy or terrorist or secessionist, or jihadist or demanding their religious laws to become the law of their land, or complaining to other countries and calling for help from their persons belonging to their religion in other countries, etc. etc. ???????????
For a community (Hindus, Christians & Sikhs) which has faced so much discrimination - razing down places of worship, forced conversions of their women, kidnapping and outright murder of their men - it baffles me to this day their continued survival in the so called 'land of the pure".
The whole basis under which the country came into existence seems to be a joke if it cannot even take care of its most vulnerable minority ! Rank hypocrisy at its finest.
they have sent notices to every person living at that particular area either hindu sikh or muslim so why giving it a sectarian look where my grandmother in that area comprises of muslims they evacuated as well so there is no question about minority and majority
Reminds one of what happened to the Native American Indians.
@Kancha Ilaiah:
Really? You guys are given reservations and cash for just attending classes- apart from job reservations and so on so forth for your kith and kin. Does Pakistan give any of this benefits to minorities?
@Kancha Ilaiah: If true then why are pakistani Sikhs,Hindus,ahmedis,Christians lining to indian embassy to to be taken as refugees and not the other way round for indians Muslims in your country? Forget indian Muslims, aprox 1700 pakistani apply every year to india to get indian citizenship and 3400 for refugee status. Go check the records and then explain why is it so.
@Kancha Ilaiah:
Indian minorities like the rich Sikhs? Rich jains? Rich Christians? Rich Zorostrians?
Oh you mean like the poor Muslims.
Ahh, well Muslims are not minority. With 15% of population they are still worse off than 1% Christians? Less than 1% Zorostrians? 2% Sikhs? 1% jains?
Then you know who is a burden on the country's economy.
You know who are being lazy and sucking up all the resources.
You know who is adding little to no value to Indian economy.
And their daily average income is between Rs 7000 to Rs 9000. Did you not read that. Thats about 210000 a month.
@Kancha Ilaiah: How can you say that? Pakistan's constitution does not give equal rights to non-muslims. Indian constitution does not discriminate on the basis of religion. In india only one mosque is disputed by hindus and see how much upheaval it has caused whereas destroying temples in Pakistan is a usual news. When you say "us indian minorities" then you must know that indian govt. encourages a minority community to increase their population and this minority community has roots in west asia and not india. So pls dont spread lies.
@vinsin: hindus in Pakistan are a billion times better off than us indian minorities, so stop spreading your RSS propaganda here.
Well Jinnah asked SIndhi Hindus to leave for India, and refused to offer protection to Hindus in case Jaisalmer and Jodhpurs joins Pakistan. Jinnah didn't do anything to stop the genocide of Punjabi Hindus who were 22% of Punjab in 1941. Jinnah also believed that atleast 86.6% of Indian Muslims will move to Pakistan. Better take the responsibility of your decision than blaming Jinnah. You could have moved after Jinnah death or objective resolution. It was purely your decision to stay back, you can blame Nehru and Liaquat for ill timed Delhi pact but not Jinnah. Jinnah wanted open border and stated clearly.