“The government suggested that Qatar Gas should take part in a tender floated by Pakistan State Oil (PSO) for LNG import but Doha refused and showed interest in striking a state-to-state deal without getting involved in any tender,” an official aware of the developments said.
The last date for submitting bids under the PSO tender was June 30, which was extended to July 15 on the demand of participating companies, which required some time to prepare bid documents.
According to officials, the tender has got an encouraging response from interested players, in sharp contrast to bids sought by the previous government, when only two domestic companies filed documents because of cancellation of tenders several times earlier.
In the current PSO tender, big energy giants have expressed interest and submitted bids including Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum and Mitsubishi. Officials term this a good omen for Pakistan’s energy needs as these companies have LNG supplies available with them.
The last tender floated by the previous government was struck down by the Supreme Court as only two domestic companies took part in the process.
According to officials, Pakistan is seeking to set a benchmark LNG price through bidding, following which it will try to weigh different options for a direct government-to-government deal. For the time being, talks for finalising an agreement with Qatar have stalled until the time bids are accepted.
The government is working on three proposals for LNG import. These include securing supplies through bids, a contract on a government-to-government basis with countries like Qatar and imports on the basis of spot purchases.
At present, all attention is focused on the bidding process as the government has drawn criticism from inside the country on reports that it will agree on LNG import from Qatar at a higher price.
Through the tender, the government will be able to fix a benchmark price for negotiating a deal with Qatar and other countries.
Meanwhile, officials said, a meeting was held at the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources to review the progress on setting up an LNG terminal by the successful bidder Elengy Terminal Pakistan Limited (ETPL).
ETPL has hired China Harbour Engineering Company as its engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor.
In the meeting, an ETPL representative said they would start dredging the water channel very soon. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is likely to conduct the groundbreaking of the terminal in the first week of next month.
First LNG shipment is expected to arrive in the first quarter of next year. The country plans to import 200 mmcfd in the initial phase, which will be increased to 400 mmcfd later.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 23rd, 2014.
Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Qatar wants a long terms deal of 5 to 10 years of consistent supply and wants to lock in prices currently between $18 to $10 per mcf.The issue is LNG supplies are increasing and prices are gradually slowing and will retreat to the range of $13 in the next 2 years and then this deal with Qatar will not make sense.Tender is a good way to proceed. Another decent way would be to sign off take agreements with new LNG producers who want guaranteed buyers so they have assurance of constructing new LNG projects such as those in Canada,US and PNG.But for these there cant be government to government contracts,PSO,PPL or PGDC have to ultimately get involved which is actually the way our energy security strategy should be
Qatar has already given a letter of their rate to Khakan Abbasi. Consider it as their bid. Moreover, Qatar has clearly told us that they do not control gas business; its done by private companies?? When you disclose price and do re-tender, its discourages bidders.
I have a suggestion, shut down all Urea plants (Engro 1/2, FJFC, FFC1/2/3, Pak American, Fatima, Pak Arab, DH = total 10 plants consuming not less than 1000 MMSCFD) and divert the gas to other industry (CNG is not an industry) and import urea.
Question: Will importing LNG at $ 15/MMBTU (i.e. 4 times the well head gas price) feasible vs importing urea or vice-verse?
@Vir Kaul
Time lines are shorter as what is being put up is Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU). The FSRU is being provided by Excelerate Energy who probably are already in possession of the FSRU that will be sailed and then moored in Pakistan.
It is a very positive development but as usual ET choses a headline which conveys negativity. @Virkaul ETPL has committed to this timeline and there is no reason to doubt it. @bahaha I wish you understood the article before commenting. The bids will establish a basis for negotiations with Qatar. If Qatar wants the contract it will have to eventually outbid shell BP and Mitsubishi
ET: Such reports should be filed by correspondents who are conversant with projects of this nature. The last paragraph says that the first shipment of LNG supply is expected in the first quarter of 2015 meaning that ETPL will be able to receive gas in 6-8 months from now, which is ridiculous. An LNG project will take a least 6-8 months to complete engineering, procure a minimum of 12-14 months to procure equipment and another 12 months for construction of unloading, storage (with refrigeration facility) and regasification facility before piped gas in connected to the existing pipe line system (if is adequate for the capacity). The above timeline may not be sequential but can have an overlap. Still, the project takes 3 years at least, not 6-8 months.
Qatar wants to bribe and corrupt our rulers with cash so that they can fix the selling price of LNG and hit our pocketbooks. What else can you expect from unelected Kings and dictators funded by USA/UK
The article doesn't really make any logic. Contents very inconsistent and seems self-contradicting, at times. Could have chosen a better/proper heading, reflecting the information presented in main article.