Electoral reforms: PTI likely to table bill in NA

The party has failed to get the support of the largest opposition group, PPP.


Qamar Zaman June 01, 2014
PTI chairperson Imran Khan along with party leaders. PHOTO: INP

ISLAMABAD:


After getting a lukewarm response from the main opposition party in the Parliament over its electoral reforms project, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has started weighing its options.


Sources told The Express Tribune on Saturday that the PTI was considering various alternatives – including introducing a bill in the National Assembly for electoral reforms.

The PTI had approached the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) some two weeks ago in order to muster support and put pressure on the government over alleged rigging in the 2013 general elections.

The party is holding rallies across the country over the issue and has also demanded that members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) voluntarily step down as they had failed to hold free and fair elections in the country.

The PPP had agreed with the PTI to join hands to the extent of working on electoral reforms in the country but had fallen short of supporting its demand for resignations of ECP members.

Interestingly, only a few days before the meeting between leaders of the two parties, leader of the opposition in the National Assembly Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah had also demanded that the ECP members step down.

However, a meeting between Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and former president and PPP’s co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari helped in changing the stance of the main opposition party.

On the other hand, the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) had endorsed the PTI’s viewpoint and nominated its three members for the committee proposed by the PTI for working on electoral reforms.

The three-member team of the PTI including its Vice President Shah Mahmood Qureshi, President Javed Hashmi and General Secretary Jehangir Tareen had held meetings with leaders of both the parties on May 14 when the PPP had said it would nominate two members for the committee.

However, that did not happen. When contacted for confirmation, PTI Vice President Qureshi said the PPP had not nominated any member as yet. Sources said the PPP was perhaps shying away therefore the PTI was considering tabling a bill on the subject.

According to Qureshi, the committee proposed by the PTI was supposed to examine existing laws, to develop a course of action on the basis of the 2013 general elections and to develop national consensus on electoral reform.

The PML-Q had nominated two of its members for the committee, Senator Kamil Ali Agha and Tariq Bashir Cheema, while the PTI had nominated Dr Arif Alvi and Shafqat Mehmood.

Syed Khursheed Shah from the PPP, however, said his party would announce two members after consultation.


Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2014.

COMMENTS (47)

Misbah | 10 years ago | Reply

@gohar khan: Parliment is not at all in favour of electoral reforms. They know their performance very well and they also know the acceptence of PTI in people. They know they can never come in govt again through free and fair elections. People have rejected now their traditional politics and their outdated philosophies. Opposition is also standing with govt, so the only way to put pressure on the govt ,for electoral reforms, is to conduct " jalsas". No matter who is saying right , what is rights , this is the point of consideration. Electoral reforms are very important . Free, fair and transparent elections are the only way to sucess of Democracy in Pakistan.

Wajiha | 10 years ago | Reply Please try to have some constitutional knowledge first. PML(N) or its government has no authority to instruct Election Commission of Pakistan, which is an independent consitutional body. Imran should have staged his Dharnas in front of ECP than Dhobi Ghaat. He was protesting on behalf of dark forces but thanks God, came to his senses after learning about their agenda in London. This is the reason he has decided to table electoral reforms in NA and has prefered to stay with his sons rather than with representatives of dark forces.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ