The Rs44 billion bus rapid transit system that will connect Islamabad with Rawalpindi is being opposed by environmentalists not because they are against mass transit, but because they feel that this mega project is wasteful; they argue that the green belts of Islamabad, which give the city its unique character, should be conserved and that existing roads (particularly the wide 9th Avenue and Jinnah Avenue) can accommodate any bus service that will run between the twin cities. “We are not trying to stop mass transit,” explains activist Bilal Haq, who is a member of the newly formed group, Islamabad Green. “We just want it modified to suit the character of the city… once the damage is done it is irreversible; we want to look after the city’s green belts.”
Dr Dushka Hussain and Christina Afridi, the other members of the group, point out that the Metro bus project was pushed through very fast without any discussion. “What’s the hurry?” they ask. Clearly this is a pet project of the ruling PML-N government and after launching the Metro bus in Lahore in record time, they are keen to have it up and running in the twin cities. Both are grand projects that give them great visibility — but are they the best use of government money? Lahore-based architect Imrana Tiwana does not think so. “These projects reflect the psyche of a nation; its distribution of budgets.” She points out that 70 per cent of the entire Punjab budget has gone towards the Metro bus in Lahore (for just one link from Ferozepur Road to Shahdara town). “For that much money we could have bought 3,000 buses for all of Punjab (30 districts of Punjab have no public transport).”
On top of it, no EIAs were done and there was no accountability for the project. In Lahore, one of the most polluted cities in Asia, 80 per cent of the residents don’t have clean drinking water; there are no treatment plants and are no footpaths; only six per cent of the residents own cars, the rest have to walk or use buses to get around, and out of a total of 500 buses in Lahore, 300 are not working.
The ‘Lahore Bachao Tehreek’ which was founded by Imrana and others in Lahore, did win a small victory in 2011; the Supreme Court declared the Lahore Canal green belts to be a public trust, park areas that were the heritage of the people. Is it too late to save the green belts of Islamabad? Perhaps for 9th Avenue, but the rest of Islamabad can still be preserved if its residents can convince the Supreme Court to protect the city’s greenery from further ‘development’.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 7th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Zain: Agreed. Haters will always hate. Such projects are purely designed for the middle working and poor class, and so the elite class driving their imported cars will always object to this. They don't understand how much a person has to suffer just to get into and out of a speeding bus driven by an illiterate driver. All the people who object to this project should for once travel in rush hour in lahore metrobus and then take a ride in any Karachi's public transport (Old buses, Minibuses, qingqis with people packed up to roof like animals) and then tell me which system is more civilized, respectable & modern to have?? Metrobus or old system?
Environmental agenda has been 'elite capture' in Pakistan. Unfortunately, there is no one who objected building wide roads in Islamabad, Faizabad and Zero point interchanges (after cutting trees) b/c everyone own a car and would love to drive (and also emit carbon) on wide roads. Metro Bus is for people, certainly its design can be improved but this project should not be objected.
First of all there is still lack of clarity about: a) The Metro Bus(there is no such thing as a metro bus, Metro is referred to a train service in the world), in Islamabad will run on elevated tracks or on ground with the fencing around it b) seems like the Rawalpindi section will all have elevated tracks as there is no space for an additional lanes for the BRTS.
It is a very expensive project if you take into account the 40 billion price tag. All was needed is a decent normal public transport system with neat and clean buses, could have started with an investment of 2 billion rupees. Rest of the amount can be utilized for public transport system in a dozen cities. Totally wrong priorities.
This is all very well said, though it would not stink with hypocrisy when the very same people are silent when the Navy is making illegal golf courses in national parks, Monal go's up and is called "development" or Isb club mows down trees for golf course, but that is okay.
What a farcical piece. Grass on the sections reserved for road expansion and transit right of way in the original and revised masterplan of the city, when used for the purpose it was intended for, is not a 'environmental catstrophy'. These are reserved and planned rights of way. Grassy knoll cut down for a transit line (bus now, LRT or more on it later) is an environmental disaster? Grass is not 'Green belts'. Heck, CDA has promised re-plantation of the tree uprooted and is digging them rightly with their roots for this purpose. Some of those trees don't even deserve replantation since they are bad for the environment due to their massive water thirst (unsuitable in the area) and high pollen counts. Replacement with better trees is appropriate.
When the 7th Ave, the 9th ave, the Jinnah ave, the zero point interchanges, the IJP Road extensions and Expressways were expanded, the noise level was at least 100dB lower. Why? Because they benefit the car driving elite (and it's elite, b/c <5% households own cars). Why is there noise only when money is spent it's for public transport uses? Why is infrastructure spending bad when it's for public transit but good when it's for the unlimited lane boulevards to DHAs, associated suburban towns and such? Every week, month, year the roads to suburbia have to be expanded to add more car ferrying capacity.
Public transit through right-of-way is efficient and environmentally friendly. It's convenient, it's appropriate. The only people who dislike it are the ones who'd rather see the money being spent to build even more flyovers for them to not to get into visible sight of the poor and working class, who'd benefit from public transit expenditure.