Pakistan, US to revive Afghan peace efforts

Dobbins met army chief Gen Raheel Sharif to discuss defence cooperation between the two countries.


Our Correspondent April 25, 2014
During the meeting with the PM, James Dobbins said that Islamabad and Washington had ‘convergences’ on the issue of Afghanistan, a source said. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and the United States would push for reviving the stalled reconciliation process in Afghanistan once a new government is put in place in the war-torn country, an official said on Friday.

The issue came under discussion during a series of meetings between the US special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, James Dobbins, and top Pakistani officials.

Before concluding his two-day trip on Friday, Dobbins met with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and army chief General Raheel Sharif. A day earlier he had met with Prime Minister’s Adviser on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz and Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan.

According to officials, the discussions focused on evolving a strategy to revive the stalled peace process in Afghanistan. Washington is keen on striking some kind of a deal with the Taliban and other Afghan insurgents before the US-led forces withdraw by end of this year.

Officials added that both sides would seek an early meeting of the trilateral group, comprising senior officials from Pakistan, Afghanistan and the US, to discuss the reconciliation efforts.

During the meeting with the PM, President Obama’s point-man for the region said that Islamabad and Washington had ‘convergences’ on the issue of Afghanistan, a source said.

According to the official statement, both sides discussed matters of mutual interests, regional security situation, US drawdown and reconciliation process in Afghanistan.

Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and US Ambassador Richard Olson also attended the meeting.

Separately, Dobbins met army chief Gen Raheel Sharif to discuss defence cooperation between the two countries as well as the current regional security situation.

Sources said the issue of transfer of some of the leftover military equipment of the US forces stationed in Afghanistan to Pakistani army also came under discussion.

Pakistan is particularly interested in the US army’s mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles, which Pentagon officials say will have limited strategic value as US forces withdraw from Afghanistan.

But with Pakistan’s military expected to be battling Taliban insurgents for years, the MRAPs could help them slow their high casualty rate – more than 20,000 dead or injured troops since 2001.

According to a statement issued by the US Embassy, Dobbins appreciated the opportunity to meet with the Pakistani leadership.

He reaffirmed the US commitment to enhancing its relations with Pakistan, discussed opportunities for bilateral coordination to promote regional stability, and explored ways for the US and Pakistan may forge a stronger partnership by working together to achieve common objectives, the statement said.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 26th, 2014.

COMMENTS (2)

Sexton Blake | 9 years ago | Reply

Perhaps I have it wrong? I thought the US had determinedly refused to negotiate with the Taliban for the last 13 years. In fact just the reverse. It is a little late to try and patch-up the situation now. That is of course unless the Taliban, and other Afghan insurgents, are extremely low functioning. Of course, this is a typical US ploy. Create mayhem, then pretend to be the good guys, and feign shock, horror when the other side does not buy a ludicrous proposal.

Genius | 9 years ago | Reply

There will be NO peace. Not until people become Muslims in large numbers. One is a Muslim only and only when among other virtues upholding of justice is in his/her everyday habits. Peace can be achieved only by making the practise of justice a vey common habit. There simply is no other way.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ