Scuffle between attaché, Pak ambassador forces Nawaz to intervene

PM asks commercial attaché, Pak ambassador to return to Pakistan after learning the two are not on talking terms.


Web Desk March 05, 2014
PM asks commercial attaché, Pak ambassador to return to Pakistan after learning the two are not on talking terms. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: The prime minister was forced to ask commercial attaché Aisha Makhdum and Pakistani ambassador Sajjad Kamran to return to Pakistan after arguments between the two had escalated to a point that it was affecting the image of Pakistan, Express News reported on Wednesday.

After receiving reports that Makhdum and Kamran were arguing with each other, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif sent his Political Secretary Dr Asif Kirmani to Sweden to make an inquiry.

Kirmani reported back to the prime minister that the two were not on talking terms and Nawaz was forced to ask them to return to Pakistan, where a more detailed inquiry will be made.

COMMENTS (14)

Mudathir Shah | 10 years ago | Reply

@Kizilbash: And I agree to your and Aka's position on the Commercial Counselors/Attaches who get the posting mostly due to political connections nevertheless, some are really talented and can deliver. In this case, the Commercial Counselor did have a lot of political clout, that is the reason, she was posted. And secondly, after the clash, it should have the Commercial Counselor, who should have been recalled. Recalling the Ambassador was the worst thing, the Prime Minister could do. The guy was about to retire in a few months in any case. But if you and Aka think like this for everyone, then its a generalization.

Mudathir Shah | 10 years ago | Reply

@Kizilbash: I have more experience than you of experiencing the embassies, knowing the people in these embassies and those people who complain about the embassies, even if you yourself are in Sweden. Surely you have a little experience but that is only one side of the story. And surely what you have said does make a sense but that is also only one side. What Aka said, is just a sweeping generalization. And I did not know that you both were given the authority to declare what's right and what's wrong. And the truth is bitter for you and Aka as well. Surely you will ask the same question about me. I will refer you to the first line of my reply. It is enough to make anyone realize what I am saying. If you or Aka are put behind the window, then the second day, the mob would be chanting slogans against you and Aka. Have you ever realized what is the criterion for pleasing the people. Those very people, who don't even dare to say any word, go like a sheep with correct documents, make a queue and wait for there turn and pay whatever the fee , only if the guy is a white guy. These very people, go to the Embassies with a presumption and prejudice, their documents are wrong and if they are told to wait or correct their documents or deposit a penny in the Government kitty, they get a heart attack and start harassing the embassies's staff. And these are the people, who bribe and harass the embassies in order to make their own profits and political career. They destroy the system for their own benefit but it works the other way as well.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ