Saudi mission

Assertion from Saudi foreign minister that he was merely on ‘friendly visit’ to Pakistan does not carry much weight.


Editorial January 08, 2014
Saudi foreign minister Saud alFaisal shakes hands with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in Islamabad. PHOTO: PID

Many laughed alongside visiting Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud alFaisal when he dismissed a suggestion that he was visiting the country to help secure a ‘safe passage’ for former dictator General (retd) Pervez Musharraf, who the court has been told is suffering from, at least, nine medical conditions. But the laughter we heard from across the country was not a friendly, joining in with light-hearted cheer. Instead, it consisted more of sniggering and scoffing disbelief. The Saudi track record, as far as meddling in Pakistan’s affairs is, after all, a well-established one, and rumours have for some time now been doing the rounds that an exit plan for General (retd) Musharraf was being finalised. Some reports say he may be aboard a plane for Riyadh within days, perhaps before travelling still further away from home, where he faces treason charges carrying a possible death sentence.

 photo Interventionin_zps3fbde45a.jpg

The assertion from the Saudi foreign minister that he was merely on a ‘friendly visit’ to the country does not carry much weight under the circumstances. The advice to Islamabad regarding not ‘destabilising’ matters adds to this perception. Intervention in our internal matters from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not new and hence Prince Saud’s statement needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. The cries of sovereignty and related matters we hear when Washington is referred to do not seem to go up. There are different rules for different countries. A Saudi rescue of General (retd) Musharraf would be ironic. Just around 14 years ago, the Saudis had whisked away, from the prison cell where he had been placed by General (retd) Musharraf, a certain man named Mian Nawaz Sharif. Mr Sharif’s government continues to insist there will be no deal.

But deep down, we know the power the Saudis wield, and the fact that the final call may well lie with them, even if this means a trial that could bring up many key issues and establish important precedents in a country ruled by the military for most of its 66 years may never reach a conclusion. For us, as a nation, this is bad news.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (4)

lkhan | 10 years ago | Reply

The success during the transition stage of democracy in Pakistan must, in order to strengthen its institutions, bring the judiciary and in this case Musharraf to task. There is no justification for the judiciary to back coup d'tats, and take overs of government under flimsy excuses by the military. Until there is serious questioning/trials of some, the establishment will not change its ways; vested interests will continue to flourish, including the interference of Saudi Arabia/other third parties in internal matters of Pakistan. The gravest being all the rotten madrassahs in the country financed by the Saudis that spread evil amongst disgruntled or poverty stricken, unemployed youth. Rather than try dialogue with hardened criminals as some politicians demand, it is time the law be applied harshly against those responsible for killing innocent lives, and destruction of resources. Unless we have a by and large honest judiciary as in the past, this will not take place. Our police officers are being killed off like flies, it is time for Pakistanis to demand change that will benefit the nation as a whole. No interference in its internal politics, politicians ought to take note of the country's voters' demands. The top of the list is being fed up with terrorism and killings, youth unemployment, corruption.. perhaps not in this order...

wizarat | 10 years ago | Reply

Normally Saudis do not come by themselves, they act as messenger of the mighty (not Almighty) Let us see what they have decided for a man they would want silenced; as he has a lot of info and speaks forcefully about Pakistan.He loves Pakistan and I have in the last 60 or so years have not heard anyone else defend Pakistan so forcefully on the world stage. The last one was Liaquat Ali Khan and we all know what happened to him.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ