Gandhi told these students the reality — that there was a lack of supply of institutions in India. He did not say it specifically, but this was a failure of civil society as much as that of the state. Such things needed money. Where would it come from in a poor nation? This is what he said. The students were unconvinced, and as is the case with most educated Indians, they tend to ascribe all problems of India to the government.
Another speech he made a few weeks ago in Jaipur was ridiculed. I watched a video of it later and learnt something I didn’t know. That the biggest problem labourers faced was health care. They worked two days and recuperated every third day, spending money on medicine, washing away all chance of saving. Their whole lives were spent in this fashion.
Gandhi struck me as being a thoughtful and nuanced observer and this is a view seconded by Amartya Sen. The Nobel Prize-winning economist was Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, which Gandhi attended, and where he impressed Sen.
Gandhi has not been able to similarly make an impression on Indian politics. He is seen as either a laughing stock, if one is to go by social media, or, even if one is sympathetic to him, a dull speaker who can motivate neither gatherings of industrialists nor those of students. Some of this opinion we can chalk down to those who are in to knife him. There exists an enormous and efficient internet propaganda machine that is monitored by Narendra Modi’s office and funded by corporates. I have written about this before and will return to it again as I gather evidence.
Other things we can attribute to the way in which Gandhi expresses himself. An example is his using the words “escape velocity of Jupiter” to describe the difficulties Dalits faced in making progress. Personally, I did not find this eccentric but for some reason, it was made fun of.
However, it is inescapably true that much of the responsibility lies with Gandhi himself. He could deliver his message, even if it is granular and more subtle than Modi’s, with more conviction if not more ability. The dispassionate view of the state of India, which I believe he holds and much of it rightly so, is that of an academic or an observer. But that is not his lot. He has chosen to participate in the game of politics and must play by its rules.
A few months ago, came the report that the Congress office-bearers in an Uttar Pradesh district had been reprimanded. They had not bothered to attend one of the party meetings that Gandhi had specifically come to their district for. It isn’t hard to see why they didn’t come. They don’t get his message because he doesn’t speak in the way other leaders do. Congressmen who pine for Priyanka’s entry into politics do so because they need a slice of the Gandhi charisma. It seems to be missing, for whatever reason, from Rahul’s arsenal. Even for those who think of him as being well meaning and earnest, there is a hole and that is a lack of passion. Even Sonia, with her broken Hindi and scripted speeches delivers something that her son is unable to.
When one is as famous and as good looking as Rahul Gandhi, charisma is a function of deployment. The media and the crowds are already there. They need to be excited by his words. This is the most ancient craft of politics, and the Greeks and the Romans were schooled in how to do it (there still exists a work by Quintilian, The institutes of oratory, on this subject). Rahul Gandhi would do well to consult it.
To listen to Rahul is to be told that we are sunk as a nation. That may be true, but it is for the politician to say what the road leading out is.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 17th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@author
Take Gandhi out of Rahul's name and lets judge his achievements. Are there any any? He is not a good orator but can that be countered with his administrative or political skills? Can the man really justify his (almost decided) priministerial candidature and position in CWC with anything except that he was fortunate enough to be born in a certain family? If him or anyone else in this world can rebuttal my question i will go ahead and vote for him in next election. But i believe that is never going to happen, exactly the reason why he and the oldest and grandest party of India are now the butt of all jokes. And unfrotunately it is not even funny
Dipak@Lala Gee:
Yes, you are correct. Three alternative are available are available in non-governing corrupt country currently ruled by the UPA government:
Narendra Modi Narendra Modi Narendra ModiI will accept any one of these alternatives.
@Lala Gee:
Lala Gee, you are that third alternative!!
Dipak@C. Nandkishore:
Indian Express is Congress newspaper. What else they can say when Congress knows that they are done in India, they can print any lies to let Congress feel good.
Dipak@Saad:
Assume that Rahul, his parents and dadi were uneducated. But what they did for country that counts. First dadi stole money. Then daddy stole money on Bofors. Then the maid made $15-20 billion dollars in Additional corruption. The maid also installed a "yes madam" Prime Minister who did what the maid wanted. Non-governance with open corruption. Now, there is no Congress leader in the country. We do not want India to turn to Pakistan. Congress has used Muslim card for 66 years and look at their condition except in Gujarat. Modi is absolutely needed. And don't worry about Aakar. He can write in May edition of the Tribune. "I WAS WRONG THE SECOND TIME. MODI is PM OD INDIA".
India seriously needs a third alternative. Both the Congress and the BJP are worthless in one way or the other.
I saw Rahul Gandhi sitting in wankhede watching the last match of Sachin. It was a stark contrast. There was Sachin who has done all that could be done in cricket and now retiring at the age of 39, and then there was Rahul who has not done anything worth mentioning in his entire life at the age or 44. At least he should get married now and have some family to take care of, or even that may be a big responsibility for our "young" stalwart.
@Saad: Let me quote woody Allen of Harvard ..What is so great about Harvard.They had a guy like Kissinger on their faculty!"
What you actually did was, you gave BJP a high-five and you pushed Congress's head under water........but then I suppose you've called it like it is.
@Saad: Grass on the other side always looks greener!!!!
this is really pathetic now. Rahul may have some average understanding of the issues but looking at his age(he is 40+ not a young kid) he should have shown some difference in providing the solutions and action plan, you cannot blame anybody if they think Rahul is undeserving of being a politician or a leader. Here congress is trying to project him as future PM which is ridiculous.
@ Nandkishore, Another of Modi or his teams mistakes which they keep on doing almost on a weekly basis.
However I would rather have compulsive liar who will atleast work and provide some governance and amenities than govt that sits on hits haunches twiddling thumbs. Just the gulf of good work between govt of congress ruled states and BJP is proof enough(UP is exception). I agree i am talking more about the middle and northern India. Congress in last 5 years especially has done nothing to deserve another chance.
Apart from being good looking and famous, one needs some accomplishments. Rahul neither has any legislative accomplishments not any executive accomplishments. All he has is the ovarian lottery which he won.
@Dipak:
he got kicked out of St Stephens - Delhi - too and then he produced some obscure certificate in "shooting" to get through in sports quota. Not to speak of pressure on the privately-run Stephens management.
@Dipak: There are lots of Cambridge and Harvard PhDs who are totally clueless about the realities of life. Harvard and Cambridge dont make a man.
Rahul Gandhi is a better leader than any Pakistani.
Latest Modi news: Modi and his followers have propagated that Modi has been invited to address the annual Republican convention In Washington DC on Nov 19.. The Republic Party has now issued a statement that it never invited Modi. Moreover the the Republican Party seal has been illegally used on the invitation cards and the names and photos of prominent senators were illegally and fraudulently printed. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/republican-party-denies-inviting-narendra-modi-to-address-leaders/1195704/3 Better a poor orator than a compulsive liar.
A Brilliant piece. What Indian media and bourgeoisie wants to listen from Politicians is not the reality but their own cooked up version of reality. Modi is better at that, Rahul is not.
Where did Aakar find Rahul had education in Cabridge? They are all uneducated but claim that they went to Cambridge or Harvard etc. etc. First Rajiv Gandhi was uneducated reject in England. Then Sonia who never studied but claimed that she went to Cambridge as if you think she went to Cambidge University. She actually was a maid who had gone to England to learn to speak English. Rahul went to Harvard only to be rejected because he does have any brain. Mr. Sen has no choice but to praise the family, otherwise he would be thrown out. For the record also note that Indira Gandhi was also a reject first from Tagore's Shanti Niketan for paying no attention to studies and making out with her German teacher and then being rejected from a college in England. Aakar, I thought you had a brain but I turned out wrong.
Noted you have managed to slip in caste and Modi as usual. You need to get a life. Is it coincidence you refer to Rahul as Gandhi? He doesn't impress not because of poor oratory, but he hasn't done anything serious. Is it beneath him to learn some administration doing some thing productive for the country as a central minister before wanting to be PM?
Sad, that sycophancy in Congress is stifling the rise of brilliant leaders like Chidambaram and Anthony. It already stopped another - Mukherjee from becoming PM. All India's loss. We're stuck with Rahul Baba; and another few decades of Nehruvian Leftist policies that did us in the first place....