I refer here to the heart-rending piece in Dawn (Nov. 13’13) “Tragedy of the Bheels” by my friend and one-time editor, the gentle Zubeida Mustafa. Zubeida writes movingly about the desecration of the grave of Bhoro Bheel, a famous folk singer of Badin after he was buried, which is the custom and the culture of Hindus who live in Sindh, and where Hindus and Muslims are buried in the same graveyards.
I have known about the Bheels for years now, my late friend Major Khurshid Ahmad Khan, 12th Cavalry, in later years after he resigned from the Army, known as Khurshid Qaimkhani, and an academic and prolific writer in Urdu, having written tomes on these gentle and hard-working people who live as close to Mother Earth as possible.
Khrusch, as he was known to his friends, had a few acres of land just outside Tando Allahyar which also had a mango orchard on it. On his small piece of farm, he had given a section of it to the Bheels who worked his land but also worked elsewhere. His own little autak was among the village and many were the nights that we sat on the rooftop in the cool breezes of the Sindhi night hearing Bheels sing their sad songs.
It saddened me no end then, to read Zubeida recount the difficulties the Bheels are facing, what with militant religion slowly creeping (well, galloping actually) southwards into the land of Sufis and Saints revered by Muslims and Hindus alike. In Sindh, there was barely any difference between Muslims and Hindus, many of the Hindu forms of greeting taken on by Muslims too, such as joining the hands in greeting. I have seen on many occasions Hindus sit by the grave of Sufi Saint Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, hands joined in reverence for hours on end during his ‘Urs’. And when I asked, I was told that Hindus visit the tomb like any Muslim, all year round.
Indeed, the saddest part of the piece I refer to is that for millennia graveyards for Muslims and Hindus were the same, both communities burying their dead in the same area, perhaps separated by a line, by their own religious rites and customs. It is the advent of the hard-right militant Mullah into Sindh, the most secular part of Pakistan, as was Balochistan, where Muslim and Hindu lived in harmony and peace, and mutual respect, that signals great danger for the State of Pakistan.
Let us here recall those great words of the Quaid-e-Azam: In an address to the Constituent Assembly on August 11, 1947, Jinnah told about the future of Pakistan as a secular state. He told this in the following words:
You may belong to any religion caste or creed — that has nothing to do with the business of the state. “In due course of time, Hindus will cease to be Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the state”.
And look at what we have done to his vision of Islam: twisted it beyond recognition of even the time that I was growing up in the early fifties. Because it is Muharram, I must once more remind my readers that we were not allowed to play the radio, and when TV arrived, the TV during Muharram. We are here talking about respect for another’s creed or religion and I cannot help but narrate the case of Maya the one very aged Hindu lady left behind in the village of Wah after Partition. A widow with no children, she was given a house in the village by my grandmother and had an allowance of a certain amount of food-grain, clothes and other such.
One day, I got to playing a prank on old Maya Amma, told by servants that she would not allow a Muslim to touch her pail of water as she carried it from the spring-fed little river that flowed on the edge of the village. I hid behind a corner in the path and suddenly jumped out and touched her pail. Maya Amma threw it to the ground and marched straight off to my grandmother to report my mischief.
In the event I got, as we say in the vernacular, two tight slaps and was told in the most severe fashion that worse would follow if I ever did that again. Maya Amma got two brand-new pails in the bargain. This little story is in no way meant to suggest that the divide between Hindus and Muslims extended across the communities: there were vast numbers of Hindu families which were friendly to mine before Partition and I often heard my mother recount the great days our family had spent with Uncle Dev Ram and Aunty Chopra and so on. I can only hope that we Pakistanis can get back what we have lost: tolerance, respect, and love for our minorities.
Which will not happen unless we first win this existential fight we have going on between tolerance and the worst revolt we have had in our lifetimes, made worse by so-called responsible people obfuscating matters and sowing even more confusion than there is now.
Which brings me straight to the JI’s statement that the ISPR should have referred the matter to the Defence Ministry. I can assure Mr Baloch that if any political party anywhere in the world had said what the Jamaat Amir had said, the armed forces would have reacted, e.g., the Pentagon would have, in one of their daily briefings!
Incidentally, I agree with the ‘formulation’ that the PM visited the Martyr’s Memorial at GHQ to pay respect to those who fell in our defence.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 15th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (43)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Proven time and again that the likes of gp65 and observer come to these pages for only one purpose. Faraz Talat articulated it well enough some time back.
@Lala Gee:
and totally ignoring the speech he made in the legislative. So, what is the difference between you (Hindu Mullah) and the Muslim Mullah?
I see 2 issues here,
(i) ignoring the speech he made in the legislative
(ii) what is the difference between you (Hindu Mullah) and the Muslim Mullah?
I will try and address both in the same reply. Now, tell me who,
A. Passed the Objectives Resolution making non-Muslims lesser citizens?
B. Passed the 2nd Amendment?
C. Blasphemy Laws?
D. Hudood Ordinance.
E. Articles 41(2) and 91(3)
Is it Hindu Mullahs (whatever that may be), or ........
PS- Also think of self exploding Martyrs, please.
@Lala Gee:
No wonder then that despite your 66+ years of machinations, Kashmiris still don’t want to live in the Indian union.
Well, it took East Pakistanis just 24 years.
If it has taken 66 years and counting, probably they do not want to become Pakistan.
Chill.
it is only the poor hygienic conditions of the local Christians which creates reluctance in many to accept that food be prepared/served by them as Islam stresses much on cleanliness. Exactly the excuse high-caste hindus had used to legitimize against the low-castes.Looks like muslims are no different.and accusing them of blasphemy is icing on the cake.
@Hella: Stop furthering lies. There is no such concept against Christians in Islam. Islam even allows intermarriage with Christians and Jews. We are not forbidden to eat food made by any Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Atheist, etc. as long as there is no pork or alcohol in it, and the meat was slaughtered properly as per Islamic rite.
Your statements prove that Indian Hindus still have many misconceptions about Islam and Muslims based on lies and propaganda. Try to educate yourself, you have more than 200 million Indian Muslims in your country. Learn from them.
@LalaGee " it is only the poor hygienic conditions of the local Christians which creates reluctance in many to accept that food be prepared/served by them". Well if you want to believe your own fairy tales, who am I to stop you. By the way when do you plan to start work on changing Pakistan's discriminatory constitution and laws.
@observer:
"Of course, we totally agree with the Qaid-e-Azam. It is his people who are proving him wrong by sticking around in the wrong Nation."
It won't take too long that they too would also start believing in the Quaid, unless of course you mend your ways. Or else be ready for couple of more partitions. No wonder then that despite your 66+ years of machinations, Kashmiris still don't want to live in the Indian union.
@Hella:
"Reminds one of all those, pure Muslims, who refused to take water from Christian Asia bibi, because they felt it was polluted by her touch."
I am amazed at the ease with which Indians presents lies as truth and twist facts to suit their purpose, and that too without any hint of shame. Unlike the Hindus beliefs/practices of looking down upon people based on their cast and religion (one wonders how the Maya Amma would have reacted if the pail was touched by the Emperor Akbar or the Sufi Khawaja Moeen-ud-Din Chisti instead of the author), it is only the poor hygienic conditions of the local Christians which creates reluctance in many to accept that food be prepared/served by them as Islam stresses much on cleanliness. This absolutely has nothing to do with the religion of the person or Christianity. Islam even allows inter-marriage with Christians.
@Lala Gee:
Apparently it seems that you, and the others clicking the recommend, do agree with what the Qauid said (or prove it wrong by treating your Muslim population fairly and equally, and stop their frequent genocides)
Of course, we totally agree with the Qaid-e-Azam. It is his people who are proving him wrong by sticking around in the wrong Nation.
With all due respect, i don't agree with the title first. Second we are falling prey to the conspiracies of our enemies. The illiterate people are exploited by a handful of 'for sale' parties and we continue to suffer as usual. In general the public has no such serious sectarian issues that could lead to killing each other. We must not forget there are several powers including neighbours who would like to keep us bleeding.
Pakistan is paying for all the evil deeds of its Politicians ,Army and Bureaucracy .Nothing surprising here the pain inflicted on Bengali ,Baluchi Pathan ,Mirzai Ahmadi and Hindu Sikh and The Common Man had to come back and haunt us ...just mend your ways "live and let live "and all will be ok .
Let us here recall those great words of the Quaid-e-Azam: In an address to the Constituent Assembly on August 11, 1947, Jinnah told about the future of Pakistan as a secular state. He told this in the following words: You may belong to any religion caste or creed — that has nothing to do with the business of the state. “In due course of time, Hindus will cease to be Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the state”.
My father passed away. Myself likely to follow the same fate. It is now above six decades. Each repeat these quotations of the father of the nation. But when the Messiah will come to implement it in letter and spirit? Do you know Mr KS?
@Abu salaam - "Observer … Another fundamentalist who just does not get it"
Typical Muslim response... personal attack ... Call someone a Islamophobe, kafir, murtad when running out of argument to refute the opponent's point.
I think this debate should continue in a civilized manner on television.Partly it is the fault of the intellectuals & liberals that we easily let the space be taken over by people who had a pseudo religious agenda.The idea of tolerance and pluralism is not just shed from a magic wand.It takes years of education by parents and mentors.The debate about Quaid e Azam should not overshadow the current state of injustoces to the minorities.The alarming reflection is that they are now thinking of applying for international refugee syatus.We must bring about dignity back to Pakistan in the comity of nations not ad a muslim nation but as a peaceful civilized nation.
@observer: Observer ... Another fundamentalist who just does not get it.
Great post mr shafi. Accurate interpretation of jinnah.
Hindus should increase their birthrate so that they don't face the same in India.
@Hella: When you are not tolerant you will always find a minority maybe the Sunni will be the last minority or maybe ones own brother
@Author and observer, Jinnah's Pakistan ceased to exist in 1971. All his speeches are now pointless.
@csmann, If Bheels have been displaced by Aryans, how come they are still found in Pakistan.
I find this a very dishonest article from Kamran Shafi. While he has correctly highlighted Jamaat e Islami's role in creating intolerance and extremism in the country he has conveniently overlooked Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's contribution in this respect. Mr. Bhutto was responsible for the Ahmedis to be declared a minority, declaring Friday a holiday, and multitudes of provisions that drove the country to the extreme right under pressure from the so-called religious parties. Mr. Bhutto is also responsible for choosing Ziaul Huq, bypassing senior military generals, to head the Pakistani Army. The havoc that decision wrought is known to everyone. Mr. Shafi served as the press secretary to Benazir Bhutto and he could not have been oblivious to PPP's historical contribution in this regard.
dear Sir, you are one of the rare , few sensible persons left in your great country- May your breed multiply by God"s grace- maybe the sufis can help to re-unite our countries of SAARC. Ini india sufis are doing very well to spread peace and harmony- ajmer sharif is just one good example- there are 1000"s of sufi shrines in india- - so also pakistan should learn to accept the teachings of the Qadiri sufi saints- and they will have more peace and prosperity.
@csmann: "Bheels are the aboriginal people of the subcontinent, living in the land since antiquity ,till Aryans displaced them." As you have brought entire subcontinent into picture , let me inform you that Bheels have been given special constitutional protection and provisions under SC/ST acts of India.....In terai areas of Nepal also they have never faced any such discrimination. Why are they facing discrimination only in the land of Pure (which itself has a sizeable population of Aryans!!!!).....................................
We are all humans first after that we are Hindus or Muslims. I believe that a person should be known according to his deeds rather than in whch way he offers prayers to almighty. For subcontinent infact it was a right decision to divide the nation as the hatred among this two religions is very easy to be misused. Indeed I would say that the partition was not completed properly, they should have transferred all hindus to India and all Muslims to Pakistan. I am not saying this out of any hatred but from a practical viewpoint. Today we see in India all political parties taking advantage of the in built hatred towards each other and the could be said for Pakistan.
Sir, I have been an admirer of your work for a long time. MANY thanks for highlighting plight of Hindus in this article. I am a Brit Hindu of Gujarati origin. My Mum went to Ajmer to Khawaji's Durgah to lay Chaddar after my wedding as a sign of "Thank you" to Almighty. I was taught by my Gran to pass under the Tajiya (as we call it) on Muharram as wish of future well being and of course no celebrations on day of Moharram. So I know what you mean in terms of tolarance taught at home.
However, as I grew up, saw the world, I realised the extent of eradication of Hindus in post seperation Pakistan against Hindus and Muslims living in relative harmony just across the border in India. One major reason being Indian education system sanitising History pages (against religious poison from ) for Kids. Exactly opposit happened in Pakistan. So now you live in a nation where a majority is already radicalised against Hindus from Schools and so are their parent.
Unlike you and me.
I am lucky to live in India and UK.
Pakistan is lucky that people like you live in there.
Mr. Jinnah's remark is a True manifestation of the Golden Principle of Islam where minorities are treated with respect and given equal opportunities in all walks of life. But the line has to be drawn somewhere. They cannot overstep the line and step on others toes. It is called "Activism" which we see among the Minorities.
@Hella:
All ideologies, @Hella , need visible ENEMIES . Ideally , there should be external enemies, and internal ones.
Why not let all minorities live and let live. ?
Keep it simple and humane.
@aaaaa:
Brother I do not get your objection.
So far as I can see, in Jinnah's version, stretching from 1934 , i.e. his return to India as President of Muslim League, to 1947,i.e. Partition, Hindus and Muslims were two distinct nations who could not live together.Even in the much acclaimed speech on 11th August , he did not say that suddenly from that day onward they ceased to be two different nations. In fact some later events involving Kashmir showed how eager was he to get Muslims away from Hindus.
My submission is, Those who could not/ would not share a country while living, could not/ should not share a graveyard for eternity.
The vision is intact, perhaps even more in focus.
@Observer Good to see ET moderators published your comment.
@csmann What whims and hatred you are talking about!! In India we read highly sanitized version of partition in our school text books which promote Indian nationalism and downplay or don't mention actual events. MAJ's Lahore speech leaves no room for Bheels to live peacefully with his Muslim neighbors. Divisive hatred and vitriol.
After reading that speech I understood why Rafeeq Zakaria said MAJ accomplished communal hatred and strife even the worst Muslim rulers couldn't. For about 10 yrs all he was doing was whip up communal frenzy.
Moderator, let this go thru. Feel free to rebut or let others respond. Truth Wins.
@aaaaa: Abdul Gafoor Majeed Noorani, columnist of Dawn, is the right person in the wrong country and not a reference.
The root of all of Pakistan's terror begins on september 7th 1974 when a secular government interferes in the religious beliefs of a section of their population. What right does a government have to take away the fundamental rights of a peaceful community? Pakistan is on the one hand very very lucky that the Ahmadi muslims are extremely peaceful and law abiding, otherwise there would have been more chaos in this country. One may agree that the government and their Mullahs have a right to consider the ahmadi Muslims as non-Muslims but THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO FORCE THE AHMADI MUSLIMS TO BEHAVE AS NON-MUSLIMS. Until the Bhutto 1974 law is repealed, I do not see Pakistan having any moral leverage on the world scene. Why do people have to rage if munawar Hassan do not believe that their loved ones are martys? Does that mean that he gives certificates as to who is a martyr and who is not?
@observer:
from the article:
"And look at what we have done to his vision of Islam: twisted it beyond recognition of even the time that I was growing up in the early fifties."
Enough said.
Further reading.
http://www.criterion-quarterly.com/jinnah%E2%80%99s-11-august-1947-speech/
By A.G Noorani no less.
@MilesToGo, "Where would you get the minorities? Over the years minorities have disappeared." Ah, but one can create minorities, Shias, Ahmedis, Barelvis, Sufis,Ismailis etc. Feel free to add to the list.
Incidentally it would be useful to recall that Bheels are the aboriginal people of the subcontinent, living in the land since antiquity ,till Aryans displaced them.It is of the ironies of history that now they are being denied even the rights of their dead.And people like "observer" up here won't hesitate to equate Qaid-e-Azam with TTP if it suits their whimsand hatred.
Nicely written and one can understand where you are coming from. When Munawar Hassan and Fazl-u-Rehman made their mischievous political statements, I went out on a limb and said words to the effect that nothing will happen because the government is inept, the organs of the state will drag their feet and the news will quickly become yesterdays story.......to the detriment of the country. It looks like I am being proved correct.
Where would you get the minorities? Over the years minorities have disappeared.
Yes,you would definitely agree with every step this PM take,not for principles but for your search of a good Job.
A. Indeed, the saddest part of the piece I refer to is that for millennia graveyards for Muslims and Hindus were the same, both communities burying their dead in the same area
B. Let us here recall those great words of the Quaid-e-Azam:
And let us recall other great words of the same great leader,
The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, litterateurs. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.
Now if Hindus and Muslims could not/ can not live in this 'ephemeral world', How do you expect them to be together in the eternal 'hereafter'?
Please do not fret Sir. Let it be.