Sabotaged peace talks: Imran disappointed by reaction of 'divided nation'

I had hoped the nation would show a stern reaction to America: Imran


Web Desk November 11, 2013
"I was hoping the entire nation would be on same page and that we would show a stern reaction to America," Imran said. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: Speaking on the National Assembly floor, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan expressed his disappointment over the public's divided reaction in the wake of peace process' death following the drone assassination of Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud, reported Express News on Monday.

"I was hoping the entire nation, including the media and opposition, would come on to the same page and that we would show a strong reaction to America," Imran said. He accused the US government of 'droning' Pakistan's peace process when a drone strike killed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan leader Hakimullah Mehsud, hours before peace talks with political parties were to commence.

"I am disappointed," he continued, "instead of the nation coming on one page to single out the US [over the sabotage to the peace process] and tell them, and I am telling the Prime Minister that he too should have taken a stand, I have seen a divided nation. And people like us who are backing the peace process are labelled as Baitullah's supporters."

"This is perhaps the most difficult time for Pakistan," he said, "How can we move forward if talks are not moving forward?"

He emphasised the need for Pakistan to present a united front so that drone strikes are discontinued, and noted that the attacks had only served to divide Pakistanis.

Crunching Numbers

The PTI chairman also bemoaned the expenses of engaging in the war against militants, which he emphasised Pakistan should never have taken on at the behest of America.

Pakistan is spending Rs90 billion per month on war, he said, adding that the money could instead have been used on education and health.

Correction: An earlier version of the article was not clear over Imran's disappointment over public's reaction. The point has been made clearer.

COMMENTS (87)

The Failed Rebel | 11 years ago | Reply

@Hussain: No, do not kill the kids. They are from the flesh and blood of this very soil. A better approach would be a cease fire for a few years during which we can develop those radicalized areas, bring education, health-care and infrastructure development. Kindness is a good measure regardless of one's beliefs. Radicalism will be uprooted itself with these measures because the essence of radicalism is that it exploits that people who are in a vulnerable position, socially, economically, mentally, and physically. No one wants to go out and blow themselves up when they have filled bellies, stable jobs, free health-care, free education. Pakistan Zindabad!

Hussain | 11 years ago | Reply

What's wrong with IK's statement?

I am not a conservative. I am a liberal, a secular and at times an atheist. But I do not understand all this Liberal Bashing of IK. All the guy is trying to say here is that elected representatives of Pakistani People should be given the chance to decide what to do about Taliban not USA. What's wrong with that?

Answer this; When USA were clearly told by Govt. of Pakistan that Hakimullah is off limits then why did they strike him down. Can any of the IK bashers answer this? And as per Ch. Nisar USA could have struck him down millions of times in past but they chose to avail this specific oppurtunity!!! Why?

Before you label me the new Dr. Munawar Hassan; I must say that Hakimullah was an evil evil man but the issue at hand is bigger than that. Peace was simply not given a chance. And it was not GOP and Taliban who did not give it a chance. It was USA. This is what disturbs me above anything else.

I hate taliban, I say kill them all, burn them to the ground and kill their children while you are at it (as they will become the new Taliban in 15 years time). However, the decision is not mine to make. The decision lies with elected representatives of Pakistan; as they know facts and events which I am not even remotely aware off.

I have trusted them to lead me (by voting) and I shall revisit my trust in five years time based on their decision making. Meanwhile as citizen of democratic and sovereign country of Pakistan I demand that "My elected representatives" should make decisions in "My Country" not Mr. Barrack Hussain Obama.

And this is What IK is saying? I ask again What's wrong with that?

PS:

It's very strange that in "comments" in all articles Imran has the most proponents except when he speaks against USA. Hardly two comments in this thread from PTI Fans. Makes me wonder? You?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ