India and Pakistan have, in recent times, not been so blessed, and hence, the yardstick of expectations has fallen dramatically. Now, we as a people, applaud when heads of government meet with a ‘at least they are meeting’ sigh of relief. Because we know, on both sides of the border, that our leaders are capable of stalling talks on one pretext or another and find it easier to line up our respective armies across the Line of Control (LoC) in the ‘eyeball-to-eyeball’ confrontations we are so notorious for.
The Manmohan Singh-Nawaz Sharif meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly at New York was one such non-event. While we peace lovers tried to hail the meeting as a ‘movement forward’, our applause was feeble at best as there was little hope that relations between the two nations would finally turn the corner. The point here is not what was said off the record. After all, public perceptions are fed by ‘on-the-record’ briefings that determine the public mood and the opposition response. The Indian briefings made it clear that ‘terrorism’ remained the key issue and while the talks were cordial, the atmospherics certainly were not. On the Pakistan side, of course, a journalist (we have similar scribes in India) queered the pitch by quoting the Pakistan prime minister as being almost defamatory in his remarks about Dr Singh, a claim that was denied. The denial was not really believed, at least in New Delhi, with the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, citing the rumour in one of his public rallies, as if it was indeed a fact. It fed into the current BJP propaganda within India. It is for Pakistan to determine whether the journalist’s claim was mischievous or genuine, with both carrying their own significance.
The damage thus has been done and the Indian premier, at least, has given up hope of visiting Pakistan in his last weeks before the general elections. The New York meeting was expected to open avenues, but given the semantics and the resultant perceptions, it has closed the tiny window of opportunity that both sides had worked to open. Given the domestic pressure, Dr Singh is unlikely to visit Pakistan, with his 10 years in office unable to break new ground with the neighbour, despite some iffy backchannel efforts.
In a totally unproductive meeting, the one positive that emerged was the seeming commitment of both prime ministers to restore the ceasefire along the LoC and ensure that peace returned rapidly. Unfortunately, even before Dr Singh had landed in New Delhi, the peace at the LoC was further shattered with both armies engaged in a confrontation that negated their political leaders’ efforts to restore the ceasefire and has instead, restored an uneasy status quo that keeps the LoC volatile and violent. There are extremists on both sides who have been waging a war against peace ever since Partition. Their stand is understandable as it feeds into their ideologies of divisiveness and hatred without which they might as well wind up shop. However, one can just not comprehend why elected governments are unable to muster the courage to defy the extremists and counter them with peace that is really the most deadly weapon against warmongers. Terrorism has to be countered with full force and this has not been done for decades. But given the change of mood amongst the people in Pakistan and the fact that the Frankenstein’s monster has turned, this could have been turned into a calibrated strategy by the political class of both countries, whereby terrorism itself could have been uprooted once and for all. But this could have been done only through a commitment to peace, not a commitment to war as there is great truth in the old adage that violence begets violence.
Meanwhile, taxpayers in both India and Pakistan should accept the New York meet of their prime ministers as yet another failed cheque, paid for but unable to deliver. Perhaps, another time, another place. Until then, we can continue to wallow in hatred and misery, and drag South Asia down with us as well.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 5th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Author: There are extremists on both sides who have been waging a war against peace ever since Partition.........
Nothing much has changed in Pakistan.
Mian Sharif invited Vajpayee when he was Prime Minister before. Right after Vajpayee's visit, Vajpayee was stabbed in the back when Pakistan played Kargil.
Mian Sharif is talking about peace a lot now and Pakistan is playing Kargil again on LOC.
Army and ISI still control Pakistan. Peace between India and Pakistan means Army and ISI will no longer be considered important for survival of Pakistan and will be sidelined.
Pakistan survives on wars and terrorism.
Pakistani army and ISI will do everything to make Pakistanis feel that "only they can keep Pakistan safe".
Many Mullahs make millions in the name of Islam. Some probably make money to hurt Shias and Ahmadis.
Pakistanis are brainwashed with all kind of conspiracy theories, blaming everything happening in Pakistan on India, US and Israel.
Pakistanis may soon be playing Taliban in Afghanistan after US withdraws. This time Afghanistan may hit back with non-State actors
What did you expect Ms. Seema Mustafa. I thought people like you said talk is better than no talk independent of the outcome. While majority in India said it makes sense to talk especially at Prime minister level ONLY when the atmosphere is conducive enough Maybe people like yourself would have been happier if Dr. Singh said the following: 1) We are reviving the Cricket series with Pakistan 2) Claims Prime Minister Sharif as a man of peace, and goes on to say India-pakistan talks should not be held hostage to events like Mumbai massacre, soldiers beheading as these are done by people who are anti-talks.
Unfortunately most of us still believe Pakistani establishment still has control over the rogue elements targeting India and unless some positive movement happens in this regard, India has no need to have fruitless talks.
@shailesh
Either it is the muslimness or the need to get their article published in Pakistani press that makes them conflate issues. I find in most of the muslim journalists or columnists from India writing in the same vein.
Dear Sir, Madam Seem Mustafa would be far more comfortable in Islamic Pakistan and I feel that should relocate from Hindu India to Islamic Pakistan and also encourage other Muslims in India to leave for Pakistan where hopefully they will be first class citizens and not be under Kafir influence. thank you sirji
Peace only come out from barrel of gun. Another 1971 will bring long lasting peace in Pakistan. Wait until then. Singh We will get our Nankana Sahib back.
If only moderators would allow all comments, this lady may some day know how to think straight!
Your Muslimness is not allowing to see what is happening. The terrorists and Pakistani soldiers are coming from Pakistan. You are mixing both the armies. But who is doing what you do not want to tell. Another point, when you see there are people on both the side of extremist. May be true, but any occasion when Indians are crossing LOC into Pakistan ?? I never heard it even from Pakistan media. Therefore intelligent, so-called liberal and secular writers should write this also.
Seema Mustafa could have been a great asset to Pakistan. It's just too bad that she did not pack up her bags and go to Pakistan in 1947. Bad for India that is.
Are you claiming that all the leaders of India and Pakistan were pygmies and faltu ? We should make you the PM of the country of your choice, since your talent is being wasted. India and Pakistan are on different trajectories with different priorities, if you would care to open blinkered eyes. Any individual would like to make friends with those who share similar beliefs and could help them get ahead. At some point in time when the people of the two countries have similar goals, I am sure they will be friends. Till then the two countries would be better off solving the multiple problems that bedevil them and offering a better livelihood to their people.
http://www.firstpost.com/india/army-foils-another-infiltration-bid-in-jk-four-more-terrorists-killed-1154429.html
A small scale war has broken out between India and Pakistan since last 11 days.
Kindly explain the reason Ms Seema ji..
South Asia! What is the connection between India and Pakistan except geography? Nepal is also facing severe problems of governance for more than a decade now but nobody says India will also go down with Nepal. Ms Mustafa is giving expression not to her fears but to her deepest desires that if her Pakistan is to sink then India must, too. Muslim journalists like her from India cause the greatest harm to the participation of Indian Muslims in the evolving and developing India.
maybe Pakistan, not India. Why drag Indian into the pervasive pessimism in Pakistan? Indians and India is very optimistic and positive. Inspite of our problems some progress has been made in reduction of poverty and corruption. New industry is employing millions. Our young are seeking jobs, not jihad. Please don't eqate us with your negative thinking!!
Not south asia. Only pakistan will go down. Not india.
You were whining before the meeting that they should meet. Now that they have met you are whining the meeting was not productive.
Indian PM visited Pakistan and had a "productive" meeting in 1999. What do you think happened.