![the writer is an assistant professor of public policy at the university of maryland and a non resident fellow at the brookings institution she tweets madihaafzal the writer is an assistant professor of public policy at the university of maryland and a non resident fellow at the brookings institution she tweets madihaafzal](https://i.tribune.com.pk/media/images/612452-MadihaAfzalNewagain-1380732060/612452-MadihaAfzalNewagain-1380732060.jpg)
Overall, the two Pakistan Studies textbooks for Classes 9 and 10 for 2013-14, which follow the new curriculum, present a marked improvement over the corresponding one for Sindh (which I reviewed in my op-ed on September 1). Each chapter has much more substance, detailing actual historical events rather than the repetitive, sometimes nonsensical, statements in the old Sindh textbook. That there is a full chapter on Pakistan’s place in the world is in itself an improvement.
But biases and errors remain. The view of history presented here remains one-sided, with India and Hindus consistently presented as conspiratorial and deceitful — both before the creation of Pakistan and after independence (resulting in, among other things, the break-up of Pakistan in 1971). The word ‘conspiracy’, overwhelmingly used with reference to India, is an all too frequent refrain. Pakistan and its leaders are, no surprise, always selfless, sincere and honest. As in the Sindh textbook, Bangladesh’s creation is stated to be the work of a “secret arrangement of big powers”. No wonder that Pakistanis are the world’s foremost conspiracy theorists.
Mentions of terrorism in this textbook are sparing. “Pakistan supported America in Afghan war but as a consequence Pakistan itself is facing terrorism”, and the sentence that began this op-ed, are the two mentions of terrorism. The book does not at all impart a sense of the depth of the terrorism problem Pakistan is facing today. That is a mistake. On Pakistan’s relationship with America, we hear of the “two-face” characters of America and the Europeans post-1965. Since September 11, the book states that “America has given loan of billions of dollars to Pakistan. However, it has never given aid for any big project of long-lasting economic and defence benefits to Pakistan.” No doubt USAID, and the US military and Congress would be aggrieved to hear this statement.
There is an effort to detail Pakistan’s relationship with a number of other countries, but as a series of facts — with dates of visits from one head of state to the other and regional conferences held in various capitals — which does not convey the true essence of these relationships. In a broader sense, much of the context is lost when students are not taught World History.
I recognise that it wouldn’t be realistic for textbooks (anywhere in the world) to be completely free of bias. These new Punjab textbooks use the word ‘enemy’ a lot less, and the word ‘evil’, not at all, relative to the old Sindh textbooks. But given where the country is today — when we are not sure ‘whose war’ it is that has seen 6,000 of our own citizens killed at the hands of other Pakistanis, when a Christian church massacre becomes a conspiracy to derail peace talks with a stakeholder who is a bloodthirsty animal showing no desire for peace — and given that the root of these very problems can be traced to what we have been taught, there is room for improvement.
The good news is that there is hope that such improvements can be made. In addition to the curriculum reform, the new competitive process for textbook writing by private publishers (based on the National Textbook and Learning Materials Policy of 2007) and the multi-step iterative process through which these submissions are reviewed, revised and the best of the best selected as the official textbook, are positive steps. Further iterations and suggestions for improving these new textbooks are welcomed by the new Punjab Curriculum Authority, as well as by the new publishers, who at the end of the textbooks, ask us to call in with suggestions and corrections. It is time that we — academics, parents, teachers and students — use these channels to voice our concerns.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 3rd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Enterprising students can go online. Age of textbook domination has passed.
@vasan : Firstly let me correct you that I always read the articles and secondly yes I have commented on your one line comment, exactly as I understood it.
America has given loan of billions of dollars to Pakistan. However, it has never given aid for any big project of long-lasting economic and defense benefits to Pakistan.
can you name any one plz????
Parvez : Pl read the full article instead of comments hence forth. The title I have mentioned is just a summary of the first paragraph of this article and similar article in the newspapers of your own country and nothing else. I have reproduced the same as you have the habit of reading only comments. ET mods : This reply is a simple rebuttal for the message addressed to me. I hope you post this. “Pakistan is playing a very effective role against terrorism and extremism in the world.” This is one of “Pakistan’s contributions towards peace-keeping in the world”, a direct quote from the new Punjab Class 10 Pakistan Studies textbook, in a chapter on Pakistan in world affairs. This statement would be greeted with incredulity in the rest of the world. It is just one example of a distorted sense of the world, and of our place in the world, that is conveyed in our textbooks.
@vasan : How petty can one get ?.........one must give credit to your system of indoctrination.
Pl change the title. "Creating an imaginary world thru indoctrinated Text books"
@Californian Desi "No doubt every new Muslim from Pakistan in Bay are look upon Hindus with disgust on their face." Hey dude: I am from the Bay Area and South Bay to be precise. I agree with your sentiment but reject the above notion.
I have many Muslim Indian/Pakistani friends and we are all just desis amongst ourselves. We we say desi we mean Indian and not Hindus, Sikhs, Muslim or xx.
ET: A good article and well balanced write up by the author. ..Another desi
This is the real world image that you don't need books for. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2441948/Three-pedestrians-knocked-speeding-driver-wanted-kill-revenge-attack.html#comments
As long as state is controlled by religion and does not function independently of any religious interference, there will be more or less the same test even in new curriculum. My sister in law from Pakistan got me her textbook for my humor (god bless her). What is surprising is that the text book actually mentioned that all the wars barring 1971 were won by Pakistan. And there is absolutely no mention of General Tika's adventure in whats now called Bangladesh. No doubt every new Muslim from Pakistan in Bay are look upon Hindus with disgust on their face. They judge even before knowing us. Such is the power of Zia's doctrine. Systematically brainwash the mass by introducing spiteful chapters against a country whom Pakistan loves to hate the most.
So what went wrong over past couple of decades ? Why the mushrooming of madrassas and basic generation without literacy ?
@author:
It seems that new books are just like Naya Pakistan promised in the last election campaign - more of the same old same old. Unless a drastic approach is taken, Pakistan will continue to suffer from extremism. Like they say - A mind is a terrible thing to waste.