Time to overhaul the PCB
The chairman controls virtually everything with the consent of the BoG, which approves every move of the boss.
The writer is head of the sports section at News One and hosts the show “Sports One”. He tweets @twitter.com/mak_asif
The day Zaka Ashraf, the former chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), orchestrated the elections to get himself elected for four years, apprehensions started to creep in and the reason was pretty straightforward: first he hand-picked the Board of Governors (BoG) by leaving out cricket nurseries like Karachi and Lahore, then he got elected.
Ashraf introduced Larkana and Dera Murad Jamali to the BoG at the expense of Karachi and Lahore and the reason was fairly obvious — he wanted to secure votes. As expected, a flurry of court petitions paved the way for an intervention from the court, which somehow put PCB activities in jeopardy.
In this scenario, it is quite clear where the blame should lie — the cricket board.
To understand the issue, one needs to look at the structure of the PCB, which indeed has a duly approved constitution. However, this very constitution, which has also been challenged in the Sindh High Court, does lead to a lot of questions over its democratic nature.
The chairman controls virtually everything with the consent of the BoG, which approves every move of the boss (chairman) and thus, the practice is called duly democratic.
The chairman features in the BoG as well as in all other important matters. Right from the financial affairs to the team selection matters, the authority of the PCB chairman is evident everywhere.
Enough has already been said on the matter and it’s time to move towards a tangible solution, which could be acquired by either studying the glorious era of Pakistan cricket — in terms of on-field performances — or by analysing the set-up of other relatively successful cricket boards around the world.
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is administratively considered as one of the strongest cricket set-ups where even the board’s head could be forced to step down if a situation calls for it. In India, zonal heads take over as the BCCI chief, on rotation basis for a period of three years.
Why can’t the PCB take every component of this system on board to ensure democracy in both letter and in spirit?
Since the regions and associations which produce and nurture cricketers at the grassroots level, are the basic components of the Pakistan cricket setup, their services should be duly recognised and, apart from constituting a hand-picked BoG, a sole body should be shaped with representation of all the regional associations and departments and all major decisions should be put before them and decided on the basis of majority votes.
As per my understanding, regional bodies are more democratic as they hold regular elections to choose officials — a practice that is not common in the PCB.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 28th, 2013.
Ashraf introduced Larkana and Dera Murad Jamali to the BoG at the expense of Karachi and Lahore and the reason was fairly obvious — he wanted to secure votes. As expected, a flurry of court petitions paved the way for an intervention from the court, which somehow put PCB activities in jeopardy.
In this scenario, it is quite clear where the blame should lie — the cricket board.
To understand the issue, one needs to look at the structure of the PCB, which indeed has a duly approved constitution. However, this very constitution, which has also been challenged in the Sindh High Court, does lead to a lot of questions over its democratic nature.
The chairman controls virtually everything with the consent of the BoG, which approves every move of the boss (chairman) and thus, the practice is called duly democratic.
The chairman features in the BoG as well as in all other important matters. Right from the financial affairs to the team selection matters, the authority of the PCB chairman is evident everywhere.
Enough has already been said on the matter and it’s time to move towards a tangible solution, which could be acquired by either studying the glorious era of Pakistan cricket — in terms of on-field performances — or by analysing the set-up of other relatively successful cricket boards around the world.
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is administratively considered as one of the strongest cricket set-ups where even the board’s head could be forced to step down if a situation calls for it. In India, zonal heads take over as the BCCI chief, on rotation basis for a period of three years.
Why can’t the PCB take every component of this system on board to ensure democracy in both letter and in spirit?
Since the regions and associations which produce and nurture cricketers at the grassroots level, are the basic components of the Pakistan cricket setup, their services should be duly recognised and, apart from constituting a hand-picked BoG, a sole body should be shaped with representation of all the regional associations and departments and all major decisions should be put before them and decided on the basis of majority votes.
As per my understanding, regional bodies are more democratic as they hold regular elections to choose officials — a practice that is not common in the PCB.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 28th, 2013.