The occasion was the administering of the oath to the new prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, by President Asif Zardari at the Aiwan-e-Sadr. As the assembled guests, mostly yesterday’s political gladiators, were exchanging pleasantries, a happy subtext spelling discontinuity, also pervaded the chandeliers-studded hall — that unlike in the past, those who lost at the hustings were not looking to be a B team for the khaki adventurers.
Perhaps it was because of the cumulative wisdom that flowed from the decades of political blundering and suffering by the politicians and which made Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif sign the Charter of Democracy, a sign that finally the politicians were convinced of the power of constitutional democracy. There was a flashback to Pakistan’s manipulated politics, its many dimensions, martial laws, GHQ-scripted politics, guided-democracy, engineered democracy, quasi-democracy. At the swearing-in ceremony, there were many who had participated in the country’s manipulated politics: generals, judges, bureaucrats and the politicians we labelled as the B team. The indirect supporters included some of us from the media, the business community, professionals, etc. There were many of us who had in the past — to quote journalist-friend-politician Senator Mushahid Hussain — seen the “triple A” route to Islamabad: Allah, Army and America. Many of us were witness to the power of the Army and America at work within Pakistan’s political domain.
While experiencing a sense of vindication, the heavy costs of this derailment were hard to forget. They surface almost effortlessly: wars, break-up of our beloved homeland, hangings of elected leaders, violence and intolerance and sections of society immersed, courtesy mostly state policies, into sectarian and ethnic hatred. Competent management of national affairs, from the social sector to business and national security to legislation, was absent — what was present was expediency and ad-hocism. For many decades, Pakistan’s brand of statecraft has largely been non-serious, resulting in deeply damaging and distressing problems.
We have also stood witness to Pakistan’s great potential — that rested in its people, resources and strategic location — misused, under utilised and wasted. This will change, because the dynamics and the realities of Pakistan have changed, so I thought. Just then the huge door flung open and in walked the president and the PM-to-be. The same faces, same parties but now with the power of transparency and public debate — which means that those who err will be stopped in their tracks. Trashing the rule of law will be vigorously questioned, as it was in March and November 2007 and also through the last five years.
Pakistan’s turning points have been the Charter of Democracy, the 2007 movement against military rule for an independent judiciary and the peoples rejection of terrorist threats in the 2013 elections. In 2007, we recognised the importance of an independent judiciary, in the post-2008 period the Constitution was civilianised and in 2013, people rose against terrorism to vote for democracy.
My thoughts were interrupted by the tune of the national anthem, we all rose in a pledge of honour to our beloved homeland. It was a proud moment, one of collective pride. Above all, this moment belonged to the cumulative lessons that the Pakistani nation, the politicians and the institutions had learnt from our painful and volatile history.
The world must know, as we do, that Pakistan proved against all odds to be a learning nation, a wise nation. Our hardships made us suffer but our ability to reflect, to discuss and debate has made us wise, not bitter. It is also the miracle of open debate, of an independent media, that the people of Pakistan rejected the blundering ways and gravely simplistic ways of the establishment and opted for the long and tedious route of democracy to reform Pakistan.
We can now genuinely say, Pakistan is no more at the crossroads. We have chosen a path towards rule of law. Our destiny is in our collective hands.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 16th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (27)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@rajat:
Obviously you have never visited China and are relying for your information about the Chinese on the American media. The Chinese do not feel suffocated. Whether they last or not I can't say but times are good for China, it is rising and most Chinese are enjoying the ride. India's economic problems are hardly anything to do with the global recession. There are many reasons why the Indian economy is struggling including the lack of a manufacturing base, poor infrastructure, the balance of payments. and a plummeting rupee. But the primary reasons is the lack of will among India's politicians to take politically tough but economically necessary decisions and massive corruption. In other words India's semi-democracy is hindering not helping, contrary to your claims.
@frank:
chinese too have to open up their political system some day and that poses great risks for their nation. india's growth is hit by supply side constraints and global recession..so it might grow slowly for few years but india has quite free and fair elections and indian people don't feel as suffocated as the chinese. in the longer term all countries need to be pluralistic democracies with rule of law and equal rights for all citizens.
@rajat:
sorry but until recently pakistan was way ahead of bangladesh (come check out the illegal bengalis in karachi for yourself). until relatively recently per capita gdp of pakistan was higher than india's. even now we don't see the extreme poverty of india. democratic india's growth rate has fallen below 5% and its economy is in serious trouble. finally china beats the world but is a dictatorship. i'm afraid the facts flatly contradict your theory.
@frank:
india is better than bangladesh and bangladesh is better than pakistan because they have a longer tradition of democracy. democracy has to be given enough time for politics, society and economy to stabilize. it is a process that can take a decade or two. of course, the masses in any country make wrong choices but they also get a chance to correct the wrongs step by step over time.
Just 20-25 years down the road and people will be searching for something better than democracy. Countries in the west are thriving not because of democracy but because of advancement in technology, economy ,education etc. These things were also there in countries with Communism. Stop putting democracy on a pedestal. We call ourselves Muslims but still take out the GOD factor from everything. Ever since we have chosen not to have an Islamic State, like Quaid and Iqbal, wanted we are bouncing around like a pinball in a pinball machine. It will continue to be this way. One day these secular-liberal people themselves will think of a system different from Democracy.
@khan:
Why don’t you grater up few of your friends and go out in the streets and say “we are optimistic, there is no more power cuts” and see what happens.
Not saying optimism is bad thing but blind optimism is delusion. Having two elections doesn’t mean democracy has taken root, empirical evidence proves otherwise.
Burma was far more established democracy when the military stepped in, took control and took it to the dark ages which it is trying to come out from.
Look around, there are many more examples. Pakistan has significant problems to overcome including an all powerful military which dictates foreign policy. Not to mention economic, and social problems and megalomaniac attitude.
The pride of your country has been burnt to ashes in ziarat, which pride are you talking about? The country out side your air-conditioned news rooms and drawing rooms has become very difficult to live in madam.
You came to this conclusion because there were two consecutive general elections. Apparently, your world view is very myopic.
Comeback when the military is under the control of the Civilian Government. Do you have any idea who is going to be succeeding General Kayani, would he stay on the sidelines and let elected government deal with the chronic problems or would he use it as an excuse to step in.
Do you know? Does anyone?
@Nasim Zehra:
thank you for the clarification. but with all due respect the contents of your article were hardly less absurd than express tribune's title. do you really expect the educated urban class to celebrate the election of a colluder with martial law dictators and arch crony capitalist as a victory for democracy?
this blessed day in Pakistan was because of NRO
This "Democracy" is stumbling under the "Charter of Democracy". A charter which commits to hold together all the Looters & Plunders of this 'Land of the Pure', under the misleading notion of "Democracy", to rule, rather than govern. Parliamentary Democracy is the most corrupt of all forms of government.
After reading this what came to mind was the saying of Ardeshir Cowasjee : Islamabad is certainly located at least a hundred miles outside Pakistan..................how true.
@frank: Frank, what makes you say, 'get back to us in six months' time?' Salams @khan: With joy, optimism, and a pinch of salt, I share your feelings. Well said, Sir. Salams
Ms. Nasim Zehra, you have courageously taken on America and the Army. America is really an all pervading and permeating headache. Only determination and internal strength to fortify and buttress our education and economy, will address our privations. On seeing this, the army will accept the truth and assuredly so, because we have General Kayani's statements of support. Salams to Pakistan
@frank:I did NOT entitle my article Pakistan has chosen wisely. This title was given by Tribune. My title was Beyond Cross Roads, On a Chosen Path. The major point made in the article is that Pakistan has finally, after much blundering, chosen the path of democracy and hence the title I gave my article.
Excellent article, this exactly is what we need; optimism. Indeed, we hit the rock bottom but now is the time to rise, and we are rising. Some of the comments are really pathetic, showing a defeatist approach. My advise to them is keep their pessimism to themselves. Things don't change overnight, but we are moving in the right direction.
Well said Zhara: You made my day.No dout our collective pride must be our beloved country. Democracy has been evolved now, we sould not forget the role of media which played tremondous role for the elections 2013.Media has created awarness and now democracy will take its root.
Pakistan has always chosen wisely! +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Isnt it?:)
A very upbeat yet pragmatic Op Ed and I agree with it. Those who dream of sudden changes in the economic conditions and improvement are not telling the truth. We had a long and painful slide and it would be even harder to get out of the hole that we have created in more than half a century. However, it is imp that we have stopped digging and started crawling out.
I am reminded of the poor starving man who just got a meal thinking he is the happiest man in the world.
dear nasim zehra get back to us in six months time and let us know if you still think 'pakistan has chosen wisely'.
We can now genuinely say, Pakistan is no more at the crossroads. We have chosen a path towards rule of law. Our destiny is in our collective hands.,
what hollow words to our poor gullible awam
Is there anyone who can explain , what rule of law and democracy is talked about by the auther. Both parties are product of martial law , PPP little better that its leader after spending 7 years in martial law govt , after being cover candidate for the martial law general also general sec of its party . After gaining full recognisition and enjoying all coridors of power created its own political party . On the other hand after being inducted in martiallaw govt nawaz shriaf remained loyal till the death of the dictator , remaing loyal afterwards also , well wasn`t he the spiritual son. Now democeacy under these two leaders can be called real democracy and this leadership can could give deliverence. We must realize it is against the laws of social and political science , these leaders and their successors have so much in their cupboards that thery cannot ever make independent decisions , beig always bound to their past and origin in politics .Leaders who deliver a nation are not those who are concieved in martial law . Very lame is to bring turkey example , they had leaders who strggled for democracy remaining outside govt and by jumping into politics thru pulling ropes in power circles. Therefore nothing shinnig and real would be achieved out of the leadership of these two parties , there here to give us more of the same. I am amzed at these writers columists who just weave a web of words . Laws of Social Science referring IBNE KHULDOON , works similarly as other laws of nature which never changes . So we remain in the quagmire of injustice, nepotism self preservation , lust of power list goes on
@author "Has tradition taken root? One swallow does not make summer - as they say in England. But it is still worth feeling positive and happy.
Agreed. But the cost of this transition continues to be an unhealthy tolerance for corruption. Can Mian sb. hold the erstwhile rulers to account? But then thank God for our overbearing judiciary. However, no more Khakis please. No more.
Yes! Fully agree & hope that Khaki's get the message loud & clear. Even leaders like AAZ & NS are no heros of mine but still million times better than generals who took the nation from one crisis to another. Even after his intriguing crash in 88, he is still smiling & made Pakistan a hostage country due to his messed up foreign policy. No more generals!
author: you must be delusional. 'moment of national pride'? Really? Are you talking about the moment when we let people destroy the home of our founder? Or may be about the moment when innocent Ahmadis are accused of blasphemy and persecuted? Or when murderers and rapists are acquitted?
Pakistan does not deserve patriotism or national pride. we as a nation are pathetic.