Blacklisted: Chinese firm takes its dispute with railways to court

Says it was blacklisted after it refused to take back an earlier petition.

Our Correspondent June 14, 2013
On May 16 and June 5, the Ministry issued additional notices purporting to cancel the agreement for the supply of 75 locomotives and seeking return of the down payment. PHOTO: FILE


Dongfang Electric International Corporation, Chinese firm, on Thursday submitted a writ petition in the Lahore High Court requesting that a Ministry of Railway order blacklisting it be suspended.

The company’s authorised representative in Pakistan Sun Zhenping moved the petition through Advocate Salman Akram Raja.

The petition says that in 2008 the company entered into a contract with the Ministry of Railway to supply 75 locomotives at $105 million.

As per the agreement, the Ministry made a down payment of $15.77 million.

Meanwhile, the counsel said, the contract became ‘politicised’. According to news reports the Ministry, entered into a deal with other suppliers to procure 150 diesel electric locomotives. It later ordered 50 additional locomotives from another party, said Raja.

The counsel said the Ministry had then began threatening to cancel the agreement with the petitioner company, leading the company to approach the court on grounds of violation of procurement rules and lack of transparency. At the request of the petitioner company, the court ordered the Ministry of Railway to re-tender the procurement of the 150 locomotives.

Raja said instead of issuing tenders again the Ministry had issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner company when it refused to withdraw the petition.

The Ministry later issued a letter blacklisting the petitioner company on March 26, 2013. On May 16 and June 5, the Ministry issued additional notices purporting to cancel the agreement for the supply of 75 locomotives and seeking return of the down payment.

The counsel mentioned that Dongfang had participated in major infrastructure projects, including the Ghazi-Barotha Hydropower Project, Nandipur Power Project, Chichoki-Mallian Power Project, and Pak-China Rail Link Pre-Feasibility.

He said that there had been no previous allegations against the petitioner company and that it had, at all the times, acted in a professional and conscientious way. Therefore, blacklisting the company was a violation of the rules issued by the Ministry of Railway.

The company requested the court to set aside the letter blacklisting it, as well as the notices calling for the cancellation of the agreement and return of the down payment. The court heard initial arguments before it adjourned the hearing until June 14 (today).

Published in The Express Tribune, June 14th, 2013.


Vectra | 8 years ago | Reply India's engines are world class engines that pakistan should consider to import.In India every equipments and machinary need to go through very thorough and strict examination and certification procedure in order to obtain clearance and approval,That is the main reason why some work misses deadline but when it completes it is just the best. Example is LCA Tejas which in current stage is more powerful than china's Jf 17 but got delayed cuz IAF is still not satisfied with it and wants more examination and advancement to be added to it.So by the time it got inducted sometime next year it will be really an advanced fighter jet in the world that people will see themselves and something the IHS janes said in its study published yesterday saying "that India,China will become the major exporter of equipments,fighter aircraft and aircraft carrier by the end of this decade" This shows India gives more stress on building world class equipments.Pakistan may feel hard to accept this just because India is its enemy but it is a fact that Pakistan itself acknowledges but not publicly.
Ghati | 8 years ago | Reply

Why doesn't the Ministry of Railways buy better engines from India, instead! It makes sense to me!

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read