Standing its ground: PkMAP unwilling to play second fiddle to PML-N

Both claim to be the largest parliamentary party with the right to form the next govt.


File photo of PML-N Sardar Sanaullah Zehri. PHOTO: NNI

ISLAMABAD:


With a gaggle of political groups busy in hard bargaining to cobble together a multi-party government in Balochistan, the PML-N is facing difficulties in achieving a leading role in the next provincial setup.


Initially, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) planned to head the coalition government with one of its own members firmly planted as the chief minister, and with the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) and the National Party (NP) as junior coalition partners.

However, in a twist, PkMAP has seemingly emerged as the largest parliamentary party after bagging 10 seats in the 51-member provincial assembly, and is not willing to play second fiddle to PML-N, which won 9 seats.

“It is our constitutional right to form a government as we are the largest party in the assembly,” said PkMAP General Secretary Akram Shah. “Nawaz Sharif has already admitted that forming the government is the right of the largest parliamentary party in a province. Thus, keeping this in mind, we should form the Balochistan government.”



Shah emphasized that PML-N should respect PkMAP’s electoral mandate. “We will find other parliamentary parties to achieve our goal if the PML-N refuses to lend us support,” he remarked confidently.

However, PML-N president of the Balochistan chapter, Sanaullah Zehri refuted Shah’s statements and claimed that his own party was the largest parliamentary group in the province.

“Our strength in the assembly is 10-seats strong, as independent candidate, Mir Sarfraz Bugti, has joined PML-N. Furthermore, more independent members of the provincial assembly will join the party in the next few days,” said Santosh Kumar, a spokesperson for Zehri.

“Majlis-e-Wahdat-ul-Muslimeen has won a seat and they have agreed to back our candidate for the chief minister position.”

According to high-level sources, PkMAP, the predominantly Pushtun party, is already negotiating with the Baloch nationalist NP, which bagged 7 seats, to form a coalition setup with its own member at the helm as chief minister. However, other sources said that NP chief Dr Abdul Malik is also vying for the chief minister position.



Additionally, NP Central Secretary Tahir Bizenjo was also unwilling to recognize the right of PkMAP to lead the coalition government. He, too, labelled PML-N as being the largest party, pointing out that many independent MPAs-elect have already joined hands with Nawaz.

According to Bizenjo, NP’s central executive committee will decide which group to join for setting up a coalition during a meeting fixed for May 19.

And yet, despite these assertions made by PkMAP and PML-N, PkMAP’s Shah remained firm in his stance. “It is not fair for PML-N to become the bigger party simply by accommodating independents,” he said. “We will not accept such tactics.”

Meanwhile, PkMAP members admitted that although talks are still underway with the PML-N and other parties, there is a general agreement amongst all that Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl, with 4 seats, will be kept out of the future Balochistan government.

According to the relevant laws, 27 seats are required to form the government in the province. No party has attained that number yet.

Cabinet conundrum

Unlike the previous government, the new government will be unable to offer portfolios to just anyone under the sun. In accordance with the 18th Constitutional Amendment, there can no longer be more than 15 members in Balochistan’s cabinet.

This amendment, passed during the Pakistan Peoples Party’s last tenure but not implemented, fixed the size of the Cabinet to 12% of the strength of the provincial assembly.

The Balochistan Assembly has 65 members, with 51 of them directly elected. It is expected that the number of Cabinet ministers will not exceed 9, and the number of advisers will not go beyond 6.

With this rule in place, the new chief minister, unlike his predecessor, Nawab Raisani, will be unable to oblige individuals – instead, parties in the coalition government will be asked to nominate members for the cabinet.

According to sources, this arrangement is bound to create resentment amongst the newly-elected members.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 17th, 2013.

COMMENTS (10)

CaptainJanjua | 10 years ago | Reply

Fun fact. There has never been a Pashtun Chief Minister in Balochistan (1972 - today); this is why the British merged one separate territory with another. So that people would fight amongst themselves. How they must be enjoying this! :( However, having said that, I like Mr. Achakzai and I think his party should be given a chance. He's arguably the most upright and respected politician in Pakistan right now. I have had the pleasure of meeting him and you can't help but be taken aback by his personality and charisma. We're seeing something new in KPK, where the PTI has been given the chance to rule. Similarly I think it would speak volumes on how much we have matured as a nation if the PkMAP were allowed to rule. That would completely restore my faith in the political process and civilian government.

Ahmad Khan | 10 years ago | Reply

I totally agree with the assertion that there is hardly any difference between the ex-chief minister Raisani and Sardar Sanaullah Zehri. Both are two different sides of the same coin. If real representation is to be giiven to the people of Balochistan, it's the right of Pakhtun and Baloch nationalists to form the government. Pakhtun nationalists being the largest party in the provincial assembly should be given the right to form government with Baloch nationalists. This will help the cause of Nawaz Sharif who wants to resolve the issue of Balochistan. Baloch nationalists should not oppose Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party to nominate their own chief minister. If Pakhtun nationalists are pushed to the wall and not let form their government, they will emerge even a bigger force to reckon with as their support among the Pakhtuns will increase tremendously. In this scenario, Balochs will be the losers, not Pakhtuns.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ