Dialogue offer: Taliban offer ceasefire to new government

Ehsanullah Ehsan welcomes Nawaz’s statement about peace talks.

Tahir Khan May 16, 2013
A file photo of Taliban fighters. PHOTO: AFP / FILE


The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the outlawed umbrella of militant groups blamed for most violence in the country, said late Wednesday that they do not rule out a ‘ceasefire’ if the new government ‘shows seriousness’ to their dialogue offer.

The ultraconservative group had also offered ‘conditional dialogue’ to the previous ruling coalition in February only to withdraw it after they did not receive a ‘positive’ response.

Now, TTP spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan says if the incoming government takes the Taliban talks offer seriously, his group will also come up with a positive response.

“If they [the new government] takes our dialogue offer seriously and makes some progress, then we could also stop attacks,” Ehsan told The Express Tribune by the phone from undisclosed location.

The incoming prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, said this week that the Taliban’s offer for dialogue would be taken seriously. “We have seen Nawaz Sharif’s reported remarks and respect his statement about our dialogue offer,” Ehsan said.

“I would reiterate that we are serious in our dialogue offer but the outgoing rulers had adopted a non-serious approach,” he added. “The TTP does not declare a ceasefire now and any such decision would depend on the new government’s approach.”

The TTP spokesman further said, “I cannot say now that we are stopping attacks but there could be a possibility of stopping attacks as a goodwill gesture once the new government takes some serious steps.”

Published in The Express Tribune, May 16th, 2013.


Taliban | 10 years ago | Reply

BTW i also think that taliban are really rattled now cos they r desperately pursuing dialogues. It needs discrenment to decide if its the time to hit hard or fininsh them through dialogue

Taliban | 10 years ago | Reply

Ok these r the terms: 1. Lay down arms. 2. No imposition of sharia. 3. No territory given to them to govern. 4. They are quarantined and put under watch. (In that case they can be spared their lives)

These are acceptable terms i think.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ