Ignored advice: ‘Establishment was opposed to Musharraf’s return’
The army’s opposition stemmed from fears that the legal challenges Musharraf is facing may open a Pandora’s box.
The apex court may issue directions to the federal government to initiate a case of high treason against Musharraf, according to senior lawyer Lt Col (retd) Inam. PHOTO: AFP
ISLAMABAD:
The country’s powerful security establishment had advised former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf not to return to Pakistan, just days before he ended his four-year self-imposed exile.
“No one wanted him (Musharraf) to come back,” an official told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymity. The primary reason that the military opposed his return was threats to his life, the source said, adding that the army also feared that his homecoming could lead to other political controversies.
The source disclosed that there was consensus among all stakeholders – including the civil and military establishment – that Musharraf should not have returned home at this stage.
However, Musharraf defied the military’s advice and went ahead with his plan.
The army’s opposition stemmed from fears that the legal challenges Musharraf is facing may open a Pandora’s box.
The Supreme Court has already taken up a petition seeking Musharraf’s trial on treason charges for imposing emergency rule and arresting top judges in 2007. The case is likely to spark several legal controversies if he opts to defend himself, observed Justice (retd) Tariq Mehmood. “The case may involve people who were then Musharraf’s aides, both in the military as well as in the civilian government,” he observed.
The apex court may issue directions to the federal government to initiate a case of high treason against Musharraf, according to senior lawyer Lt Col (retd) Inam.
The court can conduct his trial because he is a civilian now, he added.
The apex court can refer the matter to army authorities to conduct his trial through Field General Court Marshal – the highest forum to try an accused person in the military, he explained. “Musharraf’s trial can be conducted under Section 59 of the Army Act, 1954,” he went on to add.
If Musharraf, in his defence, includes the names of both civilians as well as the corps commanders, he would have to justify his stance. The court, however, could also summon anyone, whether they served in the military or civil government, he added.
Regarding any legal consent of the then civilian government in imposing the emergency, Tariq Azeem, who served as the deputy information minister in former prime minister Shaukat Aziz’s cabinet, said: “I cannot recall any cabinet meeting in which any decision was taken to impose emergency on November 3, 2007.”
However, legal experts believe it is too early to draw any conclusions at this stage and it is also not clear whether the caretaker government has the power to order such a trial.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 9th, 2013.
The country’s powerful security establishment had advised former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf not to return to Pakistan, just days before he ended his four-year self-imposed exile.
“No one wanted him (Musharraf) to come back,” an official told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymity. The primary reason that the military opposed his return was threats to his life, the source said, adding that the army also feared that his homecoming could lead to other political controversies.
The source disclosed that there was consensus among all stakeholders – including the civil and military establishment – that Musharraf should not have returned home at this stage.
However, Musharraf defied the military’s advice and went ahead with his plan.
The army’s opposition stemmed from fears that the legal challenges Musharraf is facing may open a Pandora’s box.
The Supreme Court has already taken up a petition seeking Musharraf’s trial on treason charges for imposing emergency rule and arresting top judges in 2007. The case is likely to spark several legal controversies if he opts to defend himself, observed Justice (retd) Tariq Mehmood. “The case may involve people who were then Musharraf’s aides, both in the military as well as in the civilian government,” he observed.
The apex court may issue directions to the federal government to initiate a case of high treason against Musharraf, according to senior lawyer Lt Col (retd) Inam.
The court can conduct his trial because he is a civilian now, he added.
The apex court can refer the matter to army authorities to conduct his trial through Field General Court Marshal – the highest forum to try an accused person in the military, he explained. “Musharraf’s trial can be conducted under Section 59 of the Army Act, 1954,” he went on to add.
If Musharraf, in his defence, includes the names of both civilians as well as the corps commanders, he would have to justify his stance. The court, however, could also summon anyone, whether they served in the military or civil government, he added.
Regarding any legal consent of the then civilian government in imposing the emergency, Tariq Azeem, who served as the deputy information minister in former prime minister Shaukat Aziz’s cabinet, said: “I cannot recall any cabinet meeting in which any decision was taken to impose emergency on November 3, 2007.”
However, legal experts believe it is too early to draw any conclusions at this stage and it is also not clear whether the caretaker government has the power to order such a trial.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 9th, 2013.