PML-N opinion divided over bill for two provinces

While Chaudhry Nisar defends the strategy, Ishaq Dar opposes it.


Abdul Manan February 25, 2013
Senator Ishaq Dar opposes the party’s strategy to move its own bill against the BJP bill while Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan favours the approach. PHOTO: FILE

LAHORE:


A difference of opinion has emerged in the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) over how to thwart the bill on formation of the Bahawalpur Janoobi Punjab (BJP) province piloted by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).


Senator Ishaq Dar opposes the party’s strategy to move its own bill against the BJP bill – demanding two provinces – in both houses of Parliament, while Leader of Opposition in the National Assembly (NA) Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan favours the approach, sources privy to the development told The Express Tribune.

PPP had recently submitted its BJP bill in the Senate and the house is scheduled to vote on it on February 26. The BJP bill demands formation of only one province instead of two.

Earlier, PML-N had devised a strategy to neither support nor oppose the BJP bill. Instead the party’s senior leadership led by party’s President Nawaz Sharif had decided to table its own bill demanding restoration of the Bahawalpur province and formation of the South Punjab province.



According to sources, Senator Ishaq Dar has urged Nawaz Sharif to review the party’s call for two provinces. He argued that with limited resources, running three provinces under one constitutional unit will not be a sensible move.

Dar has warned Nawaz Sharif that if PML-N will table a counter bill against PPP’s BJP bill in either Senate or NA, PPP will make sure that PML-N’s bill is passed by the house.

Senate strategy

According to PML-N’s latest strategy, the party will not make a hue and cry in the Senate when the BJP bill is put to vote and will refrain from presenting its own bill on two provinces.

NA strategy

Nisar still adheres to his stance that if Dar opposes to present bill of two provinces in the Senate then he will present party’s bill in NA when PPP will move its BJP bill in the lower house, sources said. Two of the party’s MNAs, Mian Saud Majeed and Zahid Hamid, have already drafted a comprehensive bill and submitted it to Nisar’s chamber.

The draft, besides demanding the restoration of the Bahawalpur province and formation of the South Punjab province, also calls for carving out the FATA and Hazara province.

PML-N’s Central Information Secretary Mushahidullah Khan while talking to The Express Tribune said both senior leaders will follow the party’s policy. He said that PML-N has not yet crafted its strategy for the Senate, and that the party will meet on Monday at 3pm in upper house where they will come up with a fresh stance. He said that there is a possibility that PML-N will oppose the BJP bill but it’s not a final decision.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 25th, 2013.

COMMENTS (1)

Ahmad Aziz | 11 years ago | Reply

The attempt to divide historic Punjab into two provinces must focus on addressing the economic disadvantage of South Punjab as political power is concentrated in Lahore. While a new province may seem intriguing, I believe the Provincial Assembly needs to consider how it can best address the economic concerns of South Punjab within the current provincial boundaries.

Some have cast the need for a new province in South Punjab within linguistic framework. This is unfortunate, since as a speaker of Multani I know that what is termed Seraiki is merely a dialect of Punjabi. I am a proud Pakistani and consider myself Punjabi in terms of my language and culture. Seraiki means nothing to me - it is just a term started by some who want greater power for South Punjab and try to show their demands as legitimate on linguistic grounds. Secondly if South Punjab is separated on language then what about other provinces in Pakistan. Will Sindhi-speaking areas in Sindh be next?

We need to be sensible when it comes to creating new provinces: A new province must be created based on real administrative need, not on the basis of language.

I support the Punjabi language and encourage others to show their support by signing this petition:

http://goo.gl/2WUVw

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ