Re-verification of Karachi voters: ECP likely to seek army’s help

Commission’s secretary says army to start verification in first week of January.


Irfan Ghauri December 13, 2012

ISLAMABAD:


The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is set to approve re-verification of voters in Karachi with the help of Army in its meeting with the army on Thursday (today).


“Verification by using [the] services of Pakistan Army will start in the first week of January. [However] the final decision will be taken by the commission at the meeting,” said ECP Secretary Ishtiaq Ahmed Khan.

The Supreme Court has ordered a house-to-house verification of computerised voters’ list in Karachi. It has also directed the delimitation of constituencies in the city - another contentious issue today’s meeting will discuss.

According to the ECP secretary, there are 13,000 census blocks in Karachi where the services of 13,000 personnel of the armed forces would be required to re-verify the voters.

ECP

Pakistan’s first computerised electoral rolls, which were compiled earlier this year, contain 6.8 million voters from Karachi. There had also been complains of massive irregularities in the voters’ lists in some areas of the city.

By-elections issue

The commission, headed by Justice (retd) Fakhruddin G Ebrahim, will also decide on the fate of those who violated the code of conduct in the recent by-elections in various constituencies of Punjab.

The ECP will study footage obtained from different private television channels showing supporters of some candidates resorting to celebratory firing even before the official results have been declared. If proven guilty of major violations, the commission can withhold the results and can disqualify the candidates.

When contacted, an ECP official said the contesting candidates found to be responsible for inciting their supporters to aerial firing would face action that may subsequently lead to their disqualification.

According

The commission is also likely to seek an explanation from Suno Khan Baloch, the Sindh election commissioner, who was accused by some political parties of being biased.

If the accusations of deliberate tampering with the voters’ list in Karachi held some ground, it could mean trouble for Baloch, who has managed to get a third extension in his tenure despite his retirement, according to a source. “His fate could be sealed if his role in the game was proven,” the source said.

The ECP will also discuss the issue of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa MPA Javed Iqbal, who is the only lawmaker who has not filed an affidavit on his dual nationality, nor has he tendered his resignation.

“We are not aware of his status [whether he is a dual national] nor [do we know] of his whereabouts. He did not bother to contact the commission so far,” an ECP official said.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 13th, 2012. 

COMMENTS (5)

sgrr | 11 years ago | Reply The issue of the voters list is very simple and need not to waste a lot of money and human resource. As we all know that there are two addresses on CNIC; permanent & Present and it is the requirement to produce original CNIC at the time of voting. Thus the voter must be residing on the present address or on permanent address, no room for the 3rd address. The voters list may be prepared with a click on key board with permanent address on CNIC of entire country and if any one wanted to have his/her name on present address as per CNIC, he/she may send a sms to a number (may be specified by NADRA/EC) from a mobile number registered in his/her own name or a family members name (this will be verified by NADRA). The NADRA/EC may give 15 days time to sms for request in change of voter list. This may be done through countrywide media campaign and all parties must also campaign it at their own level. The work is so easy and cost effective if we use already available NADRA data base if NADRA thinks its data base is reliable. No need to involve army, police, rangers, FC, teachers, other government departments etc except NADRA/EC. However, if one wanted to get it vote registered on a address other than permanent or present address, the SC/EC should ask him/her for the reasons.
Neutrino | 11 years ago | Reply

Good job!!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ