The incident unfolded when the entire janitorial staff comprising of 101 people protested outside the campus demanding an increase in their minimum wages, as announced by the government in July 2012. Eventually students joined in support and began campaigning on campus.
It was announced that the janitorial wage would be increased from Rs7,000 to Rs9,000, but after the announcement 16 janitors from the campus were fired.
Rasoolan Bibi lives on a 10 minutes walk from the campus and had been working at the girls’ hostel of LUMS since 1996, a time when she says, “the campus was like a jungle and snakes used to be found, but when it came to firing us, they just told us not to show up the next day.”
Students brought the plight of Bibi and the other fired janitors into the public domain by setting up a Facebook page called ‘Not just brooms.’
According to the students, the treatment of the janitorial staff on campus is objectionable.
"It is about having a clear moral conscience. This is something which happened right in front of us this is something for which LUMS is responsible,” says Jahanzaib Sukhera, one of the student involved in the campaign.
LUMS' stance
According to the minutes of the open house between students and the administration, LUMS Vice Chancellor Adil Najam stated that LUMS is not responsible for hiring or firing of the staff.
Najam also stated that LUMS administration paid the sub-contractor Rs11,000 for each janitorial member, and was under the impression that Brooms, the contractor, paid the staff a “proper wage”.
Najam told the Express Tribune that LUMS supports the students's stance and is committed to doing the right thing, but refused to confirm the raise of the wages, saying "I do not have the contractual documents in front of me."
Brooms' stance
Brooms COO, Muhammad Suhail said that as per the contract with LUMS, any government increase in wage taxes or minimum wages were to be incorporated in the amount paid by the administration to Brooms.
Suhail told The Express Tribune that in the past LUMS would incorporate changes on time, but were late this time, which prompted him to write to them. He also emphasized that while negotiations for minimum wages were underway, LUMS issued a letter for the firing of 16 janitors.
He says he tried to convince the administration that the firing would affect the quality of the cleaning services, but to no avail.
Brooms, is responsible for paying EOBI and providing social security for the LUMS janitorial staff, but admits that it is not given to the majority.
Suhail said that the Rs11,000 paid by LUMS per person also includes expenses for providing cleaning material, a van on campus for ensuring quick provision of cleaning services and 6% tax per person to the government.
He also said that according to a verbal agreement, the salary paid to the remaining 85 janitors on December 1, 2012 would be Rs9,000 per person.
Faculty weigh in
Angbeen Mirza, lawyer and a former instructor of labour laws at LUMS, has been helping the students frame the janitors’ issue in context of labour laws.
Mirza feels that the issue also has an ethical and social dimension and it is difficult to believe that LUMS does not exert a certain degree of control in how Brooms treats the janitorial staff.
She added that as an advocate of human and civil rights, LUMS has a certain responsibility to lead by example.
Dr Taimur Rehman, coordinator of Political Science department, also supports the students’ stance.
Rehman says that if Brooms is violating labour laws, then it is LUMS' responsibility to do the right thing and not engage in business with such a company.
COMMENTS (32)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Obviously someone is running a campaign to bad-mouth LUMS and ET is a major part of that. I guess Dr. Najam has his enemies at work. Although never thought such a mild and caring person would attract such venom. I guess this comes with the territory when you are at the top. So, LUMS, get used to it. This is Pakistan, people will try to bring you down just out of spite. That is what we Pakistanis do to our best people and our best institutions.
Amazing how well-informed Express Tribune people are. I actually study and live at LUMS and all of us here know that this thing fizzled out weeks ago after the VC had an Open House and explained things clearly to students. Somehow Express Tribune knows better. Or does it?
Sad that newspapers will stoop so low. I am also a LUMS student and no I am not up in arms at all. I am proud of LUMS and this really is a storm in a teacup which has been made up by a few people for no reason.
@Saeed: Sigh...really? the nephew created the facebook group? Dude I know the people running the facebook page, not one of them is remotely related or acutely sympathetic to BROOMS. Their concern is to bring attention to how precariously janitors at lums are treated and how arbitrarily they are fired. This is something that they regard as institutional hypocrisy and in dire need to be rectified.
Right now, LUMS position is to distance itself from the issue by claiming that LUMS never hired any janitors, it just hired a subcontracting company that hired the janitors.
This practice of Sub-contracting is a notorious practice that aims to distance the service user (LUMS in this case) from the service providers (janitors) in order to extract the benefits without the legal and moral responsibilities. The fact remains that such abuse of janitors (unfair fining, below minimum wage pay, no overtime pay, arbitrary dismissals without even a day's notice, exclusion from use of public spaces and etc) have taken place with in LUMS, on its premises and with the notice of LUMS authorities. These janitors, for all intent and purposes, are de facto employees of LUMS and it is LUMS' duty to make sure that janitors are treated justly, ATLEAST within its premise. The mere fact that they wear a uniform labelled "Brooms" does not deny them their right of existence in imagination of LUMS admin and its students.
I dont know who is feeding this to ET but as a LUMS student and a hostelite who is always on campus and very connected to others I know this has been a non-issue amongst LUMS students specially after it became known that the facebook campaign was started by a student who is also related nephew of Brooms owner.
@Proud LUMS student: She only cleared to be in NOP training session. She never made it to lums.
The REAL story on how LUMS treats its lower staff: http://tribune.com.pk/story/412265/a-dream-fulfilled-college-gates-open-for-guards-daughter/
Seems like an article planted by Brooms to blackmail LUMS into paying them more when they are not passing minimum wage to poor jamadars.
Wonderful Pakistan. No good deed goes unpunished here.
One of the few institutions in the country that stands for merit and principle and does the right thing and twit journalists from the Express Tribune malign it to get a few cheap clicks and views.
Shame on all of you.
what has LUMS done to make ET angry? I am sure LUMS not the only institution that have fired people or is not fulfilling minimum wage, so I wonder why all of a sudden such attention by ET on LUMS every move, could be wait, wait because they didn't extend ET favs hoodhboouy contract or because LUMS is sympathetic to PTI? :)
I am a LUMS student and frankly this issue is a non-issue. Apart from 2 or 3 people stuffing everyones email boxes with spam on this issue the rest of the community at LUMS understands that the university is working hard to take care of people who work there and trying to force Brooms to behave ethically. I can say this with all honesty that there is no place in Pakistan where lower income staff is treated with as much dignity as at LUMS. Our faculty and our VC genuinely feel for them and the conditions here are unlike any other place in Pakistan. Yes, we have a few spoiled kids, but really very few and apart from them you will always see students, teachers and even VC dealing with all staff in ways that is totally different from rest of Pakistan and a role model for others. I was also at the meeting of students with VC and was so impressed by his sincerity and feeling for the poor. I fully trust Dr Najam and am proud to have a good human being like him leading my University.
If LUS is paying 11,000 for each janitor then hats off to LUMS. I do not know of any other house or place in Pakistan that pays janitors that much. That is also much more than the minimum wage.
Maybe these students and faculty can tell us how much they pay janitors in their own homes? By the way, why do these pampered students need so many janitors. If they really feel for the poor maybe they should clean up after themselves instead of needing someone to constantly clean up after them.
These janitors are lucky. I am an engineer and taking 12000!
Maybe they are fired for ideological reasons. I would check janitorial staff dropbins.
and generally speaking, being a janitor is such a lucrative profession. shame on lums for exploiting them for 9k and not for 11k, 4 more janitors today means 40 more in the years to come. oh how could this educational institution not learn from the books and concepts that are its existence
Students should reframe from become involved and spend more time learning.
Quality of education merely can not change the society's elite class way of handling issues like that? In a horrible inflation one would not even think how a kitchen can be managed in PKR 9000. Shame on LUMS administration.
@shah go share something from fashion and style on fb.
Why are we so obsessed with LUMS?? Whats happening in LUMS currently is just a symptom of a much bigger issue afflicting institutions in Pakistan and around the world. Confining the issue to LUMS is simply trivializing the issue
Why are we so obsessed with LUMS
@shah then go chill in the fashion and style section and share something on fb
Why there is always a fuss about LUMS only? Don't other institutions (both academic and business) also hire & fire their employees??
@Aasdj1As.com: so you think lums would be running into major loses if they paid Rs.36,000 per month extra honestly we has a nation are dead to any kind of humanity!!!
I atended the minutes session that day and all i can say is that whoever is to blame, both parties are not giving the right information but rather playing the blame game. This is outrageous! The VC is saying something, the Brooms manager saying another. The difference in cleanliness is very evident this time around. Maybe LUMS should take in 2000 students next year and fire another 16 janitors. Seems logical, no?
@Aasdj1As.com:
its not a chariy..who cares that it already rips its students off with their tuition fee....and now making problem becasue cant pay the workers...simply pathetic...we sell education in Pakistan ...we are not teaching any thing...sad
@rukun:
I really have no idea wht u wanted to say with tht comment....sorry...LAME
Well done LUMS students for standing up for the underdogs. May the force be with you on your life journey.
LUMS is not a charity. Raise tuition fees by PKR 5000 per month per student to pay for these additional required wages.
Does the COO of brooms also get 9000 per month?
What a joke, the VC says they have subcontracted janitorial services, BROOMS says that LUMS fired the janitors. Pathetic, the educational elite of our country think that paying someone 11,000 a month is a "proper wage".